“COMBINING THE TWO “WE” PARTS OF ME: A Child of Divorce’s Dilemma
Recently I came across an article entitled “Mommy’s House and Daddy’s House Revisited” by Dr. Arlene Unger. The article’s conclusion is that continuity rather than similarity is in the best interest of a child of divorce.
The article quoted a paper presented at a forensic conference by Dr. Debra Gordon on Developmental Issues and Outcomes of Children of Divorce “What is more important is that there be a high degree of cooperation between parents regardless of the variability of their lives/schedule.”
The purpose of creating the “Mommy’s House and Daddy’s House” concept was to give those parent who were granted joint custody of their children in the divorce the chance to “live” 24/7 with each child even if the length of time with each was not equal. A noble attempt at justice.  But the real issue is how children of divorce best adjust to the division of their two living situations.
Many divorce parents assume if their children appear to have adjusted, any further concern is unwarranted.  However the adjustment to a families divorce continues long after the granted decree. Which means that parents and grandparents of children of divorce must keep continually vigilant of the day-to-day adjustment each child of divorce is continually required to make due to the dichotomy of two different living situations.
My concern is the necessity of parents and grandparents to remain ever alert for signs that the children have not yet made a total adjustment to their separated lives. Family members will have many opportunities to help their children of divorce make that adjustment more successful if they are willing to take advantage of them.
The problem to be solved is that the children, as they grow older, may not find it easy to unite their two parts of “WE” into a “ME.” The healthiest “ME” includes realizing it takes both sides of his or her family to make a whole.  This is not a problem that the children can easily accomplish by themselves, it requires help from their family.
In my book “IT’S NOT ABOUT YOU: A Grandparent’s Guide to Surviving Divorce in the Family I explain the child of divorce’s dilemma:
“The task of forging one life out of two backgrounds, once belonging to their parents, has been turned over to the children themselves, regardless of their age. Parents, failing to manage that merger in their marriage by divorcing, somehow expect their children to pick up the challenge without complaint and succeed. This very much necessitates the children of divorce to develop their own identities without too much assistance from the outside..”
My son was divorced 6 years by the time my book was published but the learning experiences continue. Now 7 years has elapsed and I was beginning to relax that my grandsons were doing well, with both of their parents doing their part in working toward, what I refer to in my book as a “successful divorce.”
So when I made my next visit ,I was surprised when I encountered the existence of the two parts of “WE” my grandchildren were dealing with. It was a subtle sign that the adjustment is still continuing. It also indicated that each of them was probably encountering the two “WE” parts of “ME”, frequently.
Before I arrived , my youngest grandson said to his father.” I don’t want to celebrate half- birthdays any longer because “WE” don’t observe them.” The problem with that statement was that “WE”, being his father and me, always celebrated half-birthdays when I came to town. My oldest grandson’s birthday was always celebrated because it fell during my visit but sadly ,since the divorce, I have never been able to be with my youngest grandson on his birthday.  A half-birthday celebration seemed a great idea.
With this declaration I had to step back and take a deep breath so I wouldn’t take it personally. You see the half- birthday celebration was continued after the divorce so that I would be able to celebrate both of my grandson’s birthdays when I was with them each spring and yes presents were involved.
I knew he hadn’t said that to hurt me, but rather he was saying that the “WE” with his mom didn’t celebrate half-birthdays. So when the opportunity presented itself, I took my grandson aside and told me it was all right if his Mom no longer observed half- birthdays but that it was our way for making- up for the fact we couldn’t be with him on his actual birthday. After all we loved him so much that it made his dad and I happy to celebrate too.
After that my antenna was raised and ready when my oldest grandson made the next “WE” comment. His father had recently acquired two adorable little dogs.  They were curled around his feet when my grandson said “We have three dogs.”  My antenna started to quiver. “Isn’t your math kind of off,” I said. “Don’t you actually have 5 dogs.”  He thought for a minute and with a wide smile he answered, “I really have five dogs don’t I?” From that moment on he kept comparing all his dogs size and personality.
It doesn’t take big things to get the point across that it is all right for children of divorce to combine their two “WE” parts of their lives into a whole. But it is up to the parents and grandparents to take those opportunities that present themselves to help with their child’s continuing math problem, “Mommy’s House” plus “Daddy’s House” equals the two “WE” parts of “ME.”