Archives: May 2011

Older and Wiser?

05.31.2011 3:12 PM

In today’s “New Old Age” blog, Paula Span highlights the disturbing trend of senior bullying that happens in nursing homes and assisted living facilities.  One facility administrator comments:

“What happens to mean girls? Some of them go on to become mean old ladies.”

Yikes.  Stories ensue of residents controlling the common room’s TV programming (although I have been in countless facilities and no matter the time of day Price is Right or Matlock is playing), controlling who gets to sit where in the dining room, and “general nastiness” in the guise of insults of all colors.  One physician concludes the blog saying,

“We have expectations that as we grow older we become more mature — the stereotype of the wise old person who knows how to conduct herself,” Dr. Bonifas said. “That’s not necessarily the case.”

His comment is not rocket science, but still makes me sad.  I wonder if most people, like me, imagine that I will one day simply morph into the Bea Arthur character in Golden Girls, where my house becomes a home for other elderly ladies and we stay up late at night talking about life, love, and the world while eating copious baked goods.  No one is going to want to age if aging takes us back to junior high antics and drama. Personally, the only thing I want my 80’s and my pre-teen years to share is a bad perm.

In a recent post on being “old,” a commenter made a great distinction in the never-ending task of term definition:

“I believe we tend, as a culture, to confuse the terms “healthy” and “young” much in the same way we do “diseased” and “old.”  We might simply make an effort to stop doing this.  And we might find ourselves not only naming, but even celebrating, our “old-ness.”  My vision of my life is to continue to grow and to remain strong and healthy until the day I die.”

 A lovely thought.  Made me think of the expression “old soul,” where we compliment finding wisdom in an unexpected place, and old implies depth and peace and growth.


Are Attitudes Beginning to Change?

05.29.2011 11:58 PM

Last week I had the pleasure of learning about Jayvon Muhammad, a midwife in South Carolina, working on her own campaign against the alarming normalcy of out-of-wedlock births in the black community.  (Right now that statistic hovers around 70-73%, with some impoverished neighborhoods soaring to 90% and up.)  Jezebel picked up the story, and then Clutch, a widely-read online magazine for African American women, followed.

Of course both magazines were critical of Muhammad’s work, as per the usual order of the day.  Clutch writer Leslie Pitterson said:

Lost in this rhetoric is the assumption that all black women need or are ultimately seeking out to play the “feminine role.” While it is no doubt the tradition route, to assume that marriage is for every sister does not take into account that we don’t all share the same needs and desires.

I could go on a tirade about how the author is once again regurgitating the same rhetoric to justify the unjustifiable.  Let her tell it, 73% of black women just don’t think marriage is “for” them.  I seriously doubt that most of us would rather struggle alone and in poverty with little to no help or involvement from our children’s fathers.  That is a cruel lie.

But what was different, and what gave me pause and encouragement,were the comments from 122 women who weighed in on Urban Midwifery.  From the sounds of it, attitudes about normalizing the abnormal may be starting to change.

One reader said this:

I applaud this sister for taking a stand on an issue that has been plaguing the black/Latino communities for almost 30 years. Regardless of whether you believe marriage is for you, you have to be blind not to see how damaging the baby mama epidemic is to the success of our culture.

…and frank talk I can appreciate from another:

Black women are the only ones who settle for crumbs or settle for having several kids – not just one – without expecting the man to marry her.

Overwhelmingly, Mohammad’s work was supported quite plain.  It looks like people are feeling more free to say “the sky is blue,” and that’s a very, very good thing.

Christelyn D. Karazin is the founder and organizer of “No Wedding, No Womb,” an initiative to find solutions to the 72 percent out-of-wedlock rate in the black community.

 


No Offense, But Are You Old?

05.29.2011 9:24 PM

A long-time member of our church will turn 92 years old this week.  We celebrated in worship this morning with applause.  Our 5-year old daughter turned to me and said, “That’s OLD!”

“Oh, we don’t say that
” I replied quickly.

She looked at me quizzically, paused, and then said, “But that IS old!”

A flash of sanity crossed my mind and I realized that she is right.  If 92 is not old, then what is? And so I affirmed her reasoning, “You are right, that IS old.”

I then paused to ponder how averse our society has become to calling anyone “old.”

Today’s issue of Parade magazine features Scott Bakula, Ray Romano, and Andre Braugher from Men of a Certain Age.  Romano jokes that they are more Oldtourage than Entourage.  Each of them plays 50-something-year-old men who as Bakula says, “are reluctantly facing up to the realities of grown up life.”  Braugher brings up several humbling points such as how at a certain age you become invisible to women of a certain age.  They look at you and see their grandpa.  They laugh and joke about “aging” but they never once say that they are “old” other than the Oldtourage joke.

So, when does someone become old? 

The Huffington Post published a piece by me today.  Although they have never changed the content of my pieces they routinely change the titles.  They tell you to be as literal as possible.  And I try.  I really do. My original title was: “Will the Elderly Always Fall?”  Pretty straight forward, yes? 

I have spent more time in the last 10 years than I ever could have imagined worrying about our hospice patients who fall, pouring over patient charts looking for trends in age, diagnosis, caregiver ability, age
  You name it, I’ve researched it, and as one of our nurses concluded a few years ago, “Frail people, especially elderly ones, in uncontrolled settings such as their homes, just tend to fall.”  Do we accept that?  No, our team keeps trying to prevent falls.

I thought of more humorous titles, such as “Why Old People Gotta Fall All the Time?” Or a title I might use if I were writing for Seventeen magazine, such as “Old People+Falls=BFFs?” But they each seemed to poke fun at a very serious topic, and I was worried about using the “O” word.  Can we ever say “old?” 

The title the editors chose is: “Aging and the Mind/Body Disconnect.” Wow.  First of all, when did I become a New Age healer?  Second of all, I have to note that I edited “old” to “elderly” which was edited to “aging.”

It’s amazing how everyone is aging, but no one ever becomes “old.”  Do we need to retire the word?  Or, when does a person become old?


Welcoming New Guest Bloggers

05.29.2011 3:36 PM

Lots of great stuff up at FamilyScholars in just the last couple of days, including a second post by our new guest blogger Emily Luschin, who is partnering with Bill Coffin, and a first-ever post by our new guest blogger, Stephanie Lind. Welcome, Emily and Stephanie!

Emily Luschin’s bio:

Emily Luschin has worked in the field of marriage and family as an undergraduate research assistant at Brigham Young University, Program Analyst at the Administration for Children and Families, Department of Health and Human Services, Affiliate Scholar at the Institute for American Values, contractor for the National Healthy Marriage Resource Center, and instructor of community and church marriage and relationship education. She is married to Christoph, and they are the parents of one daughter, Franziska.

And Stephanie Lind’s bio:

Stephanie Lind is a New Yorker. She spends her days on the Upper West Side where she and her husband are a part of a thoughtful community modeled after L’Abri in Switzerland. They’ve shared their apartment with 27 different people over the past four years, always ten at a time, and have also made peace with the native house mice, which they have collectively named Cecil. Stephanie reads two-to-three hundred books a year, and would probably be an obliviously irrelevant academic were it not for the tempering of her two-year-old Adeleigh, and her beautiful new Downs Syndrome baby Jolie. The Linds are also Foster parents. They are currently trying to talk New York’s Foster Care system into letting them take in teen mothers with their infants, despite being less than a decade older than the mothers. They are anticipating their first placement this fall. Depending on the number of wine and cheese symposiums that end up being thrown in her living room, she may, or may not, finish her first book The Form of a Woman: Celebrating the Divine Image in the Female Gender in the next year.


Twins Separated At Birth… For Science

05.29.2011 7:25 AM

“I felt angry… Why were we separated?” Answer: “For a Twin Study!”
“Can you legally take kids and just do what you want with them?”


The M.Guy Tweet

05.28.2011 1:28 PM

Marriage Media

Week of May 23, 2011

Courtesy of Bill Coffin

1. Six Research-Proven Habits for Happy Marriages, Hitched

“Research proves that anyone can have a happy, successful marriage. Use these tips to make it a reality.”

2. Call for Participants in Research Study on Unemployment and Marriage, Indiana State University

“I am a doctoral candidate in the Counseling Psychology program at Indiana State University.  I am conducting a study on how unemployment impacts martial quality in the current economy.  Through you and your partner’s participation, I hope to develop a better understanding of married couples’ needs and how psychologists can best serve them. Following is a brief questionnaire. . . It should take about 10 minutes for you to complete.”

3. Sexual Economics: The Forces Shaping How Young Americans Meet, Mate, and Marry, Heritage Foundation Event

“The social consequences of unwed childbearing and delayed marriage make the sexual and relational decisions of emerging adults particularly significant for the future of marriage and family in America. To better understand what motivates the sexual decisions of these young people, researchers Mark Regnerus and Jeremy Uecker assemble comprehensive survey data and illuminating personal stories in their new book, Premarital Sex in America: How Young Americans Meet, Mate, and Think about Marrying.”

4. The Public Renders a Split Verdict on Changes in Family Structure, Pew Research Center

“The American public is sharply divided in its judgments about the sweeping changes in the structure of the American family that have unfolded over the past half century. About a third generally accepts the changes; a third is tolerant but skeptical; and a third considers them bad for society.”

“This finding emerges from an analysis that the Pew Research Center conducted of responses to a survey in which a nationally representative sample of 2,691 adults were asked whether they considered the following seven trends to be good, bad or of no consequence to society: more unmarried couples raising children; more gay and lesbian couples raising children; more single women having children without a male partner to help raise them; more people living together without getting married; more mothers of young children working outside the home; more people of different races marrying each other; and more women not ever having children.”

5. Saudi Arabia University Program Aims to Combat Divorce, HuffPost Divorce

“King Saud University in Riyadh is holding a program designed to combat the rising rate of divorce in the Kingdom, said by official statistics to have reached 66 cases a day.”

“Al-Sharq Al-Awsat Arabic daily reported that the program, which is due to commence within two weeks, will offer guidance to soon-to-be-married students on ‘emotional development’ and how to ‘generate love’ in married life in order to ‘achieve happiness and avoid the problems that can lead to separation.’”

6. Strengthening Families Summit June 8-9, Wichita, Kansas

“The event will gather together national, regional and state experts, policy makers, community leaders, and social service practitioners and clinicians who are committed to taking informed action to help strengthen Kansas families. The summit is designed to collect the latest research on the social and economic impact of healthy family relationships, learn about current evidence-based practices to strengthen families, and build new connections for state and community collaboration.”

7. Review of Last Week: Learning More about the Coalition for Divorce Reform

“There’s bound to be opposition. And plenty of people will claim you’re trying to take away their right to divorce under no-fault that exists now in all 50 states, in some for as many as 40 years. What are your thoughts on this?”

“Chris: Children must have rights, too. It should not be easier to get a divorce than a driver’s license. We know the devastating consequences of divorce on children so we owe it to the children to slow down the divorce process and give kids a fighting chance to grow up in intact two-parent families. If a couple is set on divorce, our legislation won’t stop them; it will just slow down the process and hopefully save marriages.”

To learn about the Coalition of Divorce Reform, see this site.

For more, see this site.


Grandparents Teach Us to Remember

05.27.2011 8:10 PM

Memorial Day is the perfect day for grandparents everywhere to spend the day with their grandchildren passing on to them what is so important to remember.   Let them know that this is a special day, more than celebrating the end of the school year or the first bar-b-que of summer  Today is the day to remember all those brave men and now women too, who have given the gift of their life to defend this country to keep us free.

I want to share with my grandchildren the pictures of their great grandfather in his World War I uniform, their paternal grandfather in Korea in his air force blue and their maternal grandfather as an Army Chaplain while he served his many years.  Although I have no pictures,  I want them to know that a great,great, great
.. Grandfather on their mother’s side fought in the Revolution.

When I was very young I remember my mother teaching me the words to the WWI song “Over There” and to the poem “In Flanders Field.”     I remember Pearl Harbor, although I was only nine, and the chocolate chip cookies I use to make and send to my cousins overseas.  I want my grand children to know that the song “I’m dreaming of a White Christmas” is a World War II song and to always remember their cousin survived the beaches of Normandy only to die later on an island in the Pacific.

And even if on 9/11 my oldest grandson was only a baby and his brother not yet born, I want them to remember.  And I want my grandsons to say thank you to every man and woman they see in uniform who is presently serving.   As the curator of their family’s history, my duty as their grandmother is to teach them all I remember, plus what my mother taught me. I hope other grandparents will join me in teaching their grandchildren to remember too on this Memorial Day.

Today is the perfect day to take your grandchildren to visit a National Cemetery or one of the battlefields from the Revolution or the Civil War. If you have friends whose love one is serving in the military ,call up or pay a visit.  And for those of you who do remember and want to do something to say thank you, check with the Wounded Worriers or many of the other Military Family Support Groups and ask how you can help.

Most of all, let us remember those who live with the loss of their loved ones every day: the widows, widowers, sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, grandparents and yes cousins too.   Reach out and tell them you are remembering with them.

During WWI a Canadian physician, Lt. Colonel John McCrae, caring for  the dying and the wounded, wrote the famous poem “In Flanders Field”.   One particular part of it seems particularly appropriate this Memorial Day:

“To you from failing hands we throw

The torch; Be yours to hold it high.

If ye break faith with us who die

We hall not sleep, though poppies grow

in Flanders fields.”


Buying, Owning, Keeping—Less

05.27.2011 7:43 PM

New Yorkers have a reputation of being materialistic. And this just really isn’t fair. I can’t think of any group of Americans who have less stuff than New Yorkers.

My sister and I both currently have two children. My husband and two girls (one of whom has special needs) share a living space and “kitchen wall” with the other people we live with, and fit our summer and winter wardrobes, medical equipment, snowboarding equipment, car seats, toys, a playpen, and a sizeable library into an 11 by 17 room. The whole room transforms to a seating area for parties because our mattress actually rests on this convertible platform-thing that separates into two couches. And the room is actually quite pleasant to be in. If I were not so modest I might enter it in a Small Spaces Design competition, or something of the sort.

My sister, (who was horrified last year that we were bringing another child into the world because of our ‘space limitations’) rented a three level townhouse in Virginia she couldn’t afford because each boy had to have his own room. They have a play space in the basement, and a dining room that’s separate from the kitchen, that’s separate from the living room, that’s separate from the family room.

For millions of New Yorkers, a dishwasher, laundry unit (in the building—not in your apartment), and real closet space are considered luxuries not standard amenities. And, I am not the only person who would look at my sister’s master bedroom closet and think that I could turn it into a shabby chic office, a quaint infant’s nursery, or both. Most people, for most of history, have lived more like how my family lives than how my sister’s family lives; they’ve lived from relational rather than material priorities. The truth is, when you don’t have the space to store a lot of stuff, you realize how little stuff (and space) you actually need. And once you don’t have a lot of stuff, it becomes obvious how much better your life is without it.

Material possessions are a leading cause of strain on American families today. The effects reach much farther than the much talked about psychological strain caused by debt and clutter. Most of us are profoundly out of touch with how our material possessions drain our vitality, time, and resources. If we were to take a historical perspective, it’d be obvious that most Americans live on estates. And the obvious problem with that is, that unlike most historical estates, most Americans do not have servants. It seems to me that people should either limit their material possessions to an amount that they can reasonably maintain, store, care for, up-keep, and organize, or they should acquire servants. Yes, I’m serious.

We spend our weeks earning money to buy stuff, and our weekends acquiring, cleaning, organizing, and maintaining stuff. And how many arguments in families have to do with our material things? Most of the frustrations in my family usually sound like this: “Put your socks {toys, books, dishes} away!” “Have you seen my ______?” “Why did you buy another _____ {usually for me its another pair of shoes}?” “When are you going to fix the ______?”

Perhaps I belabor the point. What is for certain is that a severely disproportionate amount of resources are spent on material pursuits: we sacrifice our imagination, our time, our emotional and relational energy, our peace, our creativity.

The opportunity costs are staggering. We neglect and marginalize the life of the mind, our spirituality, our families, our community involvement, and the millions of ways we could be creative and express identity apart from material acquisition. Not even when we have abundance does our life consist of our possessions. And yet we continue to buy and consume and hoard. Because, of course, we can never have enough of what we really don’t want. Perhaps it’s time more of us took a metaphysical free-fall into asceticism and started buying, owning, keeping—less.


“There just wasn’t any rush”

05.27.2011 4:33 PM

A headline in yesterday’s New York Times read, “Married Couples Are No Longer a Majority, Census Finds.” The story noted a Brookings analysis of  census data that married couples represented 48 percent of American households in 2010, and quotes Red Families vs. Blue Families author June Carbone, who suggests that “Employment instability depresses marriage rates.”  Explaining the reasoning, Carbone says that “I can support myself and the kid, but not myself, the kid, and him.”

Employment instability surely is one factor that contributes to declining marriage rates, particularly among the non-college-educated. But it would be a mistake to suggest that it’s the only, or even primary, factor. For one thing, there’s the riddle that non-college-educated women are willing to take on the costs of raising children before marriage, but not willing to get married? If employment instability is really the primary concern on people’s minds, then why are non-college-educated women bearing children?

What do individuals cite as the reasons for not getting married? Florida asked this very question in their 2003 survey about individuals’ attitudes towards marriage. Theyincluded the following question to individuals who were in a relationship but not married (so this is presumably anyone who is in a relationship, not necessarily just cohabiting): ”Is this a major reason why you and your partner might not be planning to get married?” Table 41 at  this link lists the responses. Here are the top ten reasons that individuals cited:

“You both are happy the way things are”: 56 percent.

“You worry that the marriage would end in divorce”: 31 percent.

“The two of you are living apart”: 26 percent.

“Hasn’t come up or haven’t talked about it”: 25 percent.

“Not enough money in savings”: 18 percent.

“You don’t believe in marriage”: 16 percent.

“Too much arguing or conflict”: 16 percent.

“Questions about whether your partner is trustworthy”: 15 percent.

“You cannot afford a place to live together”: 11  percent.

“You don’t make enough money”: 10 percent.

It struck me that “You both are happy the way things are” was the top response. It reminded me of an interview I had with James, a 27 year old roofer who had been in a live-in relationship with his girlfriend for seven years before she broke up with him. I asked him why, five years into their relationship, they stil weren’t married. He kept on talking about the fact that “they weren’t in any rush”–that they both wanted to eventually get married, but things were going well, so why rush it?

Me: What would you say was the main reason for not rushing?”

James: Mainly probably because things were going so well. There just wasn’t any rush to do it…. Things were going really well… But, yeah, I think things were going so smoothly at the time, it’s just something we didn’t have to rush into … I think we kind of had that thought in the back of our heads that if we rushed into marriage that maybe things would kind of fall apart because we just kind of rushed into it, whereas we just kind of wanted to let life take us there. Do it when you feel the time is right, rather than puttin’ it on a calendar and just countin’ the days down.

Me: You said [divorce] was kind of a thought in the back of your head. Did you ever voice that to to each other. you know, ‘If we get married, it would put pressure on the relationship’?

James: Um, it’s something that we kept in the back of our heads, but we never really voiced it to one another about our relationship. But as I was sayin’ earlier, we seen people spend a large chunk of their life livin’ together with one another and then gettin’ married, then two years later just puttin’ up for reasons unknown. I’m sure we each knew what we were thinkin’, even though we didn’t specifically talk about our relationship. We kinda—I guess in a sense kind of compared our relationship to other people that we knew, like other older couples that we know that had gotten married and then a couple years down the road and had gotten divorced. And this is a man and a woman that got along really well. You know, livin’ together. They got a marriage license, they got married, then, like I said, reasons unknown, two years later they’re divorced. Things in their relationship mighta spun out of control.

As the above Florida data suggests, the lack of good-paying, stable jobs for non-college-educated young people surely contributes in some instances to young people’s hesitations to get married. But what the conventional wisdom often misses is how the normalization of sex and children outside of marriage “cheapens” marriage, so that young people sense no rush to get married. If we can have sex and children outside of marriage, and if we love each other and are committed to each other (at least we think we are), what is the “added value” of marriage?

Another important factor is what some scholars have referred to as “the long arm of divorce.” The Florida data–31 percent say they are not marrying anytime soon because they’re worried that their marriage will end in divorce–and James’ response bears this out:  James says while they never really articulated their fear that marriage would ruin their good relationship, he thinks they did have it in the back of their heads. “In the back of our heads”–it’s a telling phrase.

The point is this: “employment instability” is one of the factors that can help us to understand why young adults are opting–at least in their twenties–for cohabitation over marriage. But there are important cultural reasons to consider as well.


The Limits of Accepting Limits is Limited…

05.26.2011 5:17 PM

“I’m through accepting limits, ‘cause someone says there so,

Some things I cannot change, but till I try I’ll never know


I think I’ll try defying gravity,

Kiss me goodbye, I’m defying gravity,

I’d sooner buy defying gravity,

And you won’t bring me down
”

In the musical Wicked, the main character Elphaba, AKA the green-skinned, Wicked Witch of the West, sings of limits. The lyrics and tune are quite moving and I’ve belted them out countless times in the sound studio that is my mini-van, but I wonder
does accepting limits mean being limited?

Last night’s finale of American ldol featured two teenagers with a love for country music; a musical genre that in its best forms glorifies our human choice to face limits with optimism: even though your dog died, your woman ran off to Tuscaloosa, there’s only lite beer on tap and Depeche Mode in the juke box, you’re going to gas up your Chevy and live for today. In seasons past, Simon Cowell has commented on how country music works when the singer is able to tell a story. 9 times out of 10 the story is fairly bleak but the hope is strong. And so I thought, ‘Accepting limits doesn’t always equal being limited.’

We wrestle with this question in hospice care all the time. “If I sign up for hospice, I am giving up.” Family members, physicians, hospital staff, rarely patients surprisingly, express this sentiment in a variety of ways as if accepting limits equals being limited.

In the past year, several studies have shown that the quantity of life is rarely less for hospice patients versus patients with similar disease processes and prognosis who do not opt for hospice care. However, the quality of life as reported by the deceased caregivers is consistently rated as better for hospice patients versus non-hospice patients. A recent study from Korea, shows similar statistics: the days of life are not reduced in hospice patients but the quality of those days is increased in hospice patients.

So, one may be wondering why these types of studies are completed in the first place. Well, the current hospice benefit is an “or” benefit rather than an “and” benefit. Meaning you can continue seeking aggressive treatment for your disease-process OR you can consent to comfort care in hospice. But Americans are not “OR” kind of people, we are “AND” people! All of healthcare throughout life is focused on CURE rather than CARE, and to presume that lay people will be able to choose comfort over seeking a cure when vulnerable and facing death is a bit optimistic. There are 12 concurrent care demonstration projects being carried out this year with the hope being that making hospice an “AND” benefit will both serve more of the dying as well as serve them better.

Perhaps accepting the limits of humanity’s ability to accept limits will make hospice care unlimited. There’s gotta be a country song in there somewhere



Three Comment Rule

05.26.2011 10:51 AM

In order to hear from additional readers of FamilyScholars, we are asking all commenters to abide by the three comment rule. Effective immediately, please limit your comments to 3 PER POST. All comments after your third one will be deleted. Thank you.


From Australia

05.25.2011 1:53 PM

One mother, her lesbian ex-partner, the known “donor”/father who the mother now wishes to remove from the birth certificate, and one vulnerable child.

Welcome to the world of three-person parenting.


Why A Power Of Attorney Is No Substitute For Marriage When A Loved One Is In The Hospital

05.25.2011 1:22 AM

In comments, On Lawn wrote:

Laws don’t regulate who can and who can’t be visited by their beloved, hospitals do.

That’s a nice theory, but not how it works in real life. Hospitals can to a significant degree be regulated by public policy (hence the law being discussed in Wisconsin; hence Obama’s recent executive order, which is nice, but which can be undone the moment a Republican takes office as president).

…there are other ways to get that recognition still. Not having a DP registry does not stop a same-sex couple from obtaining visitation rights, it is not substantially a marriage benefit (as Anna noted).

The “other ways,” as I understand it, are legal papers: health care proxies, power of attorney, and so forth. But in practice, lesbian and gay couples have found again and again that legal papers aren’t reliable when they’re needed most.
Read More


Culture Matters, But Money Matters Too

05.24.2011 1:46 PM

At this post, where I wrote about a South Carolina-based midwife who has something to say about marriage, commenter “Jill” wrote this:

I get that having a spouse can often provide additional support in the sense of caring for children, but when you’re talking about poor women, you’re usually talking about poor men, too. The problem with pushing marriage is that, yes, the couple together is making more and sharing more duties than either alone (we hope!), but then the mother also wages out of a lot of social services, without adequate income to make up those services through the private sector…

And commenter “Brian” responds:

Jill raises some very important points.   If you are poor getting married is not always the wisest choice  in this country because, as Jill notes, it will often result in making a person ineligible for any social supports, housing subsidies, medical care, food stamps, etc..

The response of the right wing in this country is to abolish the little that is left of a social safety net and to rely instead on stigmatizing out of wedlock births and single parenthood.   I am surprised how little attention Family Scholars Blog  gives to economic policies that impact people’s choices about marriage and raising children.

Perhaps Jill and Brian might like to read our recent proposal, “The Other Marriage Penalty: A New Proposal to Eliminate the Marriage Penalty for Low Income Americans.”

Or a working paper from 1999, ”A Call For Family Supportive Tax Reform.”

Or our 2009 edition of State of Our Unions, “Money and Marriage.” Or our 2010 issue on “The Retreat from Marriage in Middle America.”

Or our recent literature review on the interconnections between thrift and marriage.

Or look at the site of our Center for Thrift and Generosity, for example Center director Barbara Dafoe Whitehead’s recent New York Times Room for Debate blog post on “Why Americans Can’t Save Money.”

Or stay tuned for upcoming news of our Nest and Nest-egg Initiative. Lots will be rolled out in the next couple of years.

The Nest and Nest-egg initiative is dedicated to exploring and promoting the best ways to strengthen marriage and thrift as broadly achievable pathways into the American middle class.

To rebuild the nest: We seek to eliminate the disincentives to marriage in law, public policy and popular culture and to strengthen marriage as the culturally favored and socially supported child-rearing institution.

To build a nest-egg: We seek to build pro-thrift institutions for those Americans who have increasingly turned to “anti-thrift” institutions such as payday lenders and government lotteries in the hopes of getting ahead.


Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Refuses To Defend LGBT Rights Law

05.24.2011 7:48 AM

Gov. Scott Walker believes a new law that gives gay couples hospital visitation rights violates the state constitution and has asked a judge to allow the state to stop defending it.

Democrats who controlled the Legislature in 2009 changed the law so that same-sex couples could sign up for domestic partnership registries with county clerks to secure some – but not all – of the rights afforded married couples.

Wisconsin Family Action sued last year in Dane County circuit court, arguing that the registries violated a 2006 amendment to the state constitution that bans gay marriage and any arrangement that is substantially similar.

A few points.
Read More


‘Campaign Against Normalizing the “Baby Mama”‘

05.23.2011 7:28 PM

Who is better placed than a midwife to speak on behalf of babies and mothers and why marriage matters? Who has greater moral authority to speak to the family crisis of our time besides the woman who is on call 24/7 to bring new life into the world?

Check out the South Carolina-based Urban Midwifery Inc. and their 2011 “Campaign Against Normalizing the ‘Baby Mama’.”

At Urban Midwifery we believe that there are NO healthy babies, without FIRST healthy mamas! Urban Midwifery believes that there is a strong connection between the “Baby Mama Epidemic”, (single mamas having babies) which disproportionately affects the Black Community, and the high infant mortality rate, causing Black Babies to die more.

We know that married women typically have more financial resources. Also they have more emotional support and involvement from their spouses. This leads to more stability, better nutrition, and less stress. One of our largest goals is to promote marriage and family within the Black Community to ensure that pregnant women, and those planning pregnancy have the proper support, resources, and education. more

I have chills. Support the work of this 501c3. Something big is brewing.


Where Do I Fit in the Web of Human Family?

05.23.2011 2:07 PM

Persons conceived via anonymous sperm donation are using DNA kits to find at least a few answers. Here, here, and, and our FamilyScholars blogger Stephanie Blessing, here.


Commercial Conception: Why Not Ask Those Conceived This Way How It Feels?

05.23.2011 2:03 PM

At his blog Donated Generation, Aussie Damian Adams, who was conceived via anonymous sperm donation, writes:

In some ways it is a good thing that the financial costs can be discussed openly about how much it did in fact take for some people to create their families. On the other hand I am disgusted that we have come to a stage in our societal progression (or is it regression) that we are able to talk about obtaining children through a financial transaction. At the heart of the matter it is the commodification of human life. Whereby you are able to purchase whatever you want so long as you have the resources to do so.

My genetic father sold me for what works out to be a couple cartons (slabs) of beer. This analogy is used as the vendor recruits were taken from university students, who on the most part needed a bit of extra cash to go out drinking on weekends (yes I have been a university student, seen the advertisements for donations and had other students tell me that this is what they do (or did)). Knowing that you were traded around like a product with little regard to your welfare and whether or not you would want to have your kinship severed, your heritage deleted and your family medical history sealed away from you is dehumanising. more


Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: ‘It’s about them–and us’

05.23.2011 10:09 AM

Columnist Patrick McIlheran writes:

A hundred or so social-service types and officials and deputy this-and-thats came to talk in Milwaukee last week about welfare and the family – mainly about how people on welfare so often have single-parent families and what could change that.

You’d think this would be all about getting poor people to do something different. Yet the most arresting talk was about changing the rest of us.

“It’s not a ‘them’ problem,” said marriage scholar David Blankenhorn. “It’s a ‘we’ problem.”

Want to reduce poverty? Then address “our complicity,” he said, in creating the culture that got us to where huge numbers of children now are born into families where they’ll grow up with one too few parents.

Yes, he’s talking about you and me…read more


‘Grandfamily Housing’ Hopeful Trend

05.22.2011 4:54 PM

On May 3,2011 The Kansas City Star announced the opening of a new housing project called Pemberton Park.  If the reader didn’t look too closely, one would think it was an indication of economic recovery.  Instead when one of the first tenants announced, “It is a piece of heaven right here on earth” this reader stopped for a closer look.   Pemberton Park was actually another in a very hopeful trend to help grandfamilies in our country find decent safe affordable housing.

In 1999 Boston, the first city to recognize the need for housing grandfamilies struggling under the extra economic burden of caring for their grandchildren, opened up Grandfamilies House the first housing project of its kind in the nation.  Two years later the Boston Housing Authority opened up a similar model in a different area Mayor Thomas M. Menino said at the time “Not only is this project bringing back needed vacant, public housing apartments, but it is also providing a needed service for grandparents raising grandchildren in our city.”

Since then the need to help these grandfamilies has only grown into what The United States Office of Personal Management and others have called a” silent epidemic.”  Epidemic because the social ills of divorce, drug and alcohol abuse along with mental illness, HIV/Aids or incarceration of parents, teenage mothers who are not equipped to care for their offspring have created a situation where grandparents are needed to step in and fill the parental void.  When you add to that the cases of military deployment, the economic downturn that has caused parents to leave their children behind as they seeking work in other locations and in the worst scenario the death of a parent, the critical situation becomes clear. It is also considered a “Silent” epidemic because too few are bringing the great need to the publics attention.

According to the latest 2010 census 4.9 million grandchildren are living in the care of their grandparents, up from the 4.5 million of a decade ago. These “Grandfamilies”, as they are now referred to provide a great service, not only for their grandchildren, but for the community at large as they serve as a buffer between their grandchildren and the foster care system which saves the taxpayers millions of dollars.

One of the greatest needs of a grandfamily with very limited resources is in housing.  There was some recognition to this need with the introduction of the Legacy Act: living equitably, grandparents aiding children and youth proposed in June of 2003 by Hon. Michael E. Capuano of Massachusetts. Although this act was not passed in its entirety, some of its provisions were added to the American Dream Downpayment Act, which after passing both the House and Senate was signed into law by President Bush on December 16th of 2003.  This Act requires HUD to “ implement national demonstration projects that provide opportunities within HUD’s Section 202 program to develop housing specifically for grandparents and other relatives raising children.”

Other states have been encouraged by this legislation to develop combinations of federal, state and private funding to create other Grandfamily housing projects around the country:  Champlain Village in Detroit, Fiddler’s Annex in Smithville, Tennessee, Roseland Grandfamily Apartments in Urban Chicago, Kinship Village in Cleveland, Hartford’s Grandfamilies Housing Program, Grandfamilies Place of Phoenix, Grandparent’s Houses in Baton Rouge, Grandparent Apartments in the South Bronx, and Clare Courts in Baltimore.  And as previously mentioned  “the little piece of heaven” Pemberton Park in Kansas City, the newest addition to the list.  These Projects ,include not just housing, but needed supportive social services too. GrandFamilies House in Boston, the oldest of the group, for example provides an on-site resident services coordinator, live in house manager, educational services and help with obtaining additional resources, transportation computer learning center and tutoring.

All these cities should be commended at being at the forefront of this trend.  But there is so much need and so many more opportunities for other cities and other states to join them to make this trend a permanent movement.

It is also time to not only help but to recognize the incredible contribution grandparents are making by to help some of the at- risk children of our nation  grow up to become  healthy adults.

These are indeed GRANDFAMILIES!