Archives: March 2011

Friends of your Marriage

03.30.2011 2:29 PM

This past Saturday, David and I joined three other young married couples to plant a garden in our Astoria/Long Island City neighborhood, which we hope (fingers crossed) will provide us with fresh fruits and veggies that taste just as good as the organic produce at Whole Foods, but without the price tag. While the men took the bus to Home Depot to buy cedar to make planters and bagged soil for our raised beds, the women had brunch (any scraps of food went into the compost bin, of course) and then organized a clothing exchange. I lugged a small suitcase of clothes I liked but was tired of to my friend’s living room, lined with dark wall shelves full of philosophy books and a plush red couch, where we laid out a strapless dress too short for its owner, dress pants that needed to be hemmed but never were, shoes ordered online that looked cuter in the picture, among other things—and everyone left with something “new.” Later on in the afternoon, there was weeding and building and tilling to do in the small, overgrown backyard that we hope to transform into something beautiful. And then of course there was a celebratory meal when the work was done: deli meat and cheese and a colorful array of fruits, brown and white breads, cool green cucumbers, salad with blue cheese crumbles, and water with lemon slices and mint leaves.

I once heard marriage therapist Bill Doherty use the term “friends of your marriage.” I realized as we were enjoying our feast that this term aptly describes what this group of friends is to David and me.

For one, they share a bedrock commitment to marriage—they’re the types who say things like, “Divorce is not an option. We don’t even use that word.” I know that if David and I were arguing, my girlfriends would not feed the fire of any grudges I was holding, but would give me a better perspective. And the ability to talk about our marriages and share experiences is invaluable. I’m always amazed at how a problem seems to be much less of a problem when you realize that it’s relatively normal. I know when David and I had our first major fight because I felt he wasn’t being empathetic enough and he felt that I was being overly dramatic, it helped so much to hear that our friends had had similar arguments. We were able to talk about why we were each feeling this way and to resolve the issue without feeling like the argument was a deal breaker or a major crisis—our friends had fought over the same sorts of things, and they were doing just fine now. It’s reassuring to have models like that.  

Conversely, when we moved out of the city for three months last year and were away from our friends, relatively isolated in a small town, we got on each other’s nerves a lot more than usual.

Doherty’s term, “friends of marriage” captures the truth that marriage is, as sociologist Kai Erikson says, “something of a community affair.” In his book Everything in its Path, Erikson elaborates by saying that marriage is “
validated by the community, witnessed by the community, commemorated by the community” (219) and that the community is almost like a magnetic force that can help to hold the couple together (or perhaps tear it apart).

Given this, I think that one thing that we can all do to lower the divorce rate is to “befriend” the marriages of our friends and families—whether that means offering a listening ear, offering to babysit on a Friday night, or working cooperatively on a garden.


Coupon Lady and Proud of It!

03.29.2011 11:12 PM

I grocery shop every Saturday. I may have anywhere from one to three children with me depending on how adventuresome I feel that day. I am usually happy not only to get out of the store alive with any and all of my children alive as well but also to save as much money as possible. I like to think of myself as a competitive shopper, so you will understand how my heart soared to hear these words spoken to me last Saturday.

I was nearing the end of my shopping excursion, pushing a cart heavy-laden with my trip’s bounty of hunted and gathered and carefully bargain-priced goods when a checker who was standing at her checkout station awaiting the next customer called out, “Hey! It’s the Coupon Lady!”

I caught my breath as my eyes misted in pride and I waited for the requisite bestowal of floral mu-mu, plastic jelly sandals, and chain-smoking habit that surely accompanied such a title. I smiled and waved my grocery list/envelope filled with coupons. On a side note, I am convinced that the next great invention in paper goods–yes, I know, I am a dinosaur–is what I call “envelo-notes.” A note pad made of envelopes–a coupon collector’s dream!

As I began unloading my cart, the checker mused, “I wonder how much you’ll save today?”

Since she asked…I felt I had license to launch into my philosophy of competitive shopping which basically consists of considering any trip where I save less than $30 to be a failure and obsessively scouring the internet and paper for coupons that match my shopping list.

“Wow. It sounds like a lot of work and time,” she replied.

I shrugged and realized that what trolling for coupons and parsing my shopping list really does is slow me down. I don’t buy as impulsively and I think about what we as a family really need. And, of course, who doesn’t want to be the Coupon Lady?!?!

I’ve been reading Eric Kraft’s Little Follies: The Personal History, Adventures, Experiences, and Observations of Peter Leroy (So Far), and the Coupon Lady seems like the kind of character Peter might have known as he grew up in Babbington, a small coastal community where young Peter swims in a sea of clams, family and friends. Peter’s life is slow; he actually has time to ponder and appreciate the nuances, needs, and wants of his family and he learns to savor the life in even the most mundane of tasks.

In “The Static of the Spheres,” the 10-year-old Peter convinces his Guppa to build a short-wave radio “with” him. As Peter’s “enthusiasm” and Guppa’s “experience” collide, held together for 46 weekends by a meticulously detailed plan ordered from the Impractical Craftsman, Peter learns to value the passing of time. He compares that lesson to his love of his Gumma and Guppa’s toaster–not a common pop-up toaster but a chrome box with a toast tunnel where the bread is pulled along on a conveyor belt of heat and becomes toast. Peter writes:

“Now here comes the best part. The manufacturer of this toaster, clearly nobody’s fool, had provided a small circular window in the side, so that one could watch the rhythmic rightward shuffle of the slices of bread and their progress from bread to toast…and from that toaster I learned to think of time as a belt, to think of being in transit, and I laid the groundwork for a persistent nostalgic affection for the wave theory of electromagnetic radiation and round-faced watches and slide rules, and I developed a sense of time passing.” (186-187)

In hospice care, I am astounded by how many times those who are grieving will say, “I just thought we had more time.” Regardless of whether the person was healthy last month, quickly diagnosed and now gone or traveled a slow slope of decline over the last ten years, death always seems to come at the wrong time. Time was never quite slow enough. Those who cope the best tend to be those who have found joy in life and genuinely can laugh at themselves and at the world.

I had lunch with a colleague today who commented on his experience serving parishioners in hospice care. He often he sees this paradox: some of the most alive people he has met have been the most broken in body and most failing in their vital organs and some of the most physically healthy and bodily whole people he knows have been the most dead people he has ever met. Sometimes physical struggles slow us down enough to find joy.

“We are all obliged, if we are to make reality endurable, to nurse a few little follies in ourselves.” Marcel Proust


My Father’s House

03.29.2011 9:28 PM

My Father's Daughter

Now that it’s been a couple of weeks since I discovered that my bio-father is Jewish, things are starting to sink in. For almost two years now, I’ve wondered what my life would have been like if I had grown up with both of my biological parents. But now, a new dimension has been added to the sparse information that I know about him, and it’s got the wheels in my mind going again.

What would my life be like if I had been raised as a Jew? Yes, I know that my mother isn’t Jewish, however I’m assuming that both of my bio-parents would have raised me…play along with me…she could have converted. I would have been raised in a Jewish doctor’s home, instead of a somewhat Christian I-can’t-remember-what-my-Dad-did-but-it-had-to-do-with-computers-at-a-bank kind of home.

I was a bright child and did well the first few years in school, but then discovered how much fun reading books was and so ditched school work, and barely managed to graduate from high school, even though I know that I could have made straight A’s if I had tried.

If I had been raised with in my father’s home, would I have gone to a private school? Would I have been made to discipline myself with school work instead of just reading books? Would I have had a new car at 16 instead of a hand-me-down Subaru? Would I have developed a taste for alcohol and gotten into way more trouble than I did? Would I have gone to a prestigious college and be well into my career? Would I have met my husband and had five children or would my career take precedence over my personal life?

Where would I be in life if I had been raised with both of my biological parents?

I don’t know, but aside from just wondering, because that’s what we humans do, I truly am thankful for my life, though I do wish I’d tried harder in school and hadn’t read so much Stephen King.  I’m thankful for this life because this is the one that God gave me.  I don’t understand why He allowed me to be born into this…alternate existence, rather than the existence that most people are born into when they are raised by both genetic parents.  I feel the tension between wondering about that other life and the life I was given, and I know that it means questioning God’s sovereignty in my life.  I don’t think God made a mistake by any means; somehow His Will is being accomplished in me, even though I hardly think that donor conception is a godly way to create a baby.  But I digress.

Like Amy’s “What If Monster” it would be so easy to fall into the abyss of what might have been. I’m sure that I’ll get over these thoughts soon.


Courting and Choosing a Spouse in the Age of Google

03.29.2011 3:43 PM

Check out David Lapp’s article on Boundless Webzine,  “What If She’s Not the Right One?”.

David applies Barry Schwartz’s paradox of choice to the dizzying array of potential partners young adults can choose from in the age of globalization and the internet. He also discusses how marriage introduces us to a new paradox–the paradox of gift.


‘The Other Half of the Debate: Calling the Churches to Confront the Experience of Donor Conceived Persons’

03.28.2011 4:59 PM

FamilyScholars blogger Stephanie Blessing and I just got word that our paper was accepted, on this topic, to present at the Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity conference in Deerfield, IL this July. Come see us!


Can’t put a price tag on children? You just did.

03.28.2011 12:52 AM

“Having a biological child was extremely important to me.”


The “What If” Monster

03.26.2011 4:59 PM

A young man died in our community this week. A terrible accident, severe burns, and death came soon after. The young man was friends with the son of one of our hospice chaplains. Our bereavement team of chaplains and social workers attended the assembly when the principal compassionately shared the news of the young man’s death with the student body. Silence. The air was heavy and still. We stayed after to sit with individuals and small groups who wanted to talk.

In the midst of the tears and shock and denial and sadness, I noticed that the “What If ” Monster had entered the auditorium. He snuck in quietly but soon he had somehow multiplied himself and had joined every group and sat next to every individual.

“What if I had been with him? What if he had been found earlier? What if I had called him that day? What if his parents hadn’t divorced? What if his Grandma was still living? What if I hadn’t said that? What if I had known him better? What if I had told him how much his friendship meant to me? What if he walks through the door right now? What if this is all a dream? What if he had more money? What if he had changed schools? What if he hadn’t changed schools? What if he hadn’t played basketball? What if he had joined the band? What if he stayed in youth group? What if…? What if…?”

None of these exact questions were asked but a multitude of variations swirled in every conversation. The “What If” Monster’s jaws opened wide, inviting us all to be swallowed up and lost in the never ending pit of futile, wishful thinking.  When we feel most out of control and most nearest to despair, the “What If” Monster is ready and waiting to be our best friend and scare us into paralysis.

I recently read The Maltese Falcon, a detective novel featuring the private investigator, Spade, and a motley crew of suspects, fiends and friends who cross his path in his pursuit of the truth.

I stopped short mid-novel when I remembered that my favorite author, Paul Auster, lifts a section from this book in his book Oracle Night. Auster tends to write about writers who are writing books about writers (it’s much less confusing in narrative form!). At the heart of each narrative lies the delicate question of plot: How do the dance partners of chance and will choreograph our life’s drama? What he finds is story, and that story often has story after story nesting within each story, and each story usually begins with a “What if….”

And so in The Maltese Falcon story, detective Spade pauses to tell a story to a suspect about a man named, Flitcraft. Spade had been hired to find him after he disappeared from Tacoma on his way to a luncheon, leaving a wife and children and successful career in real estate. Spade catches up with Flitcraft 5 years after his disappearance.

“Here’s what happened to him. Going to lunch he passed an office building that was being put up–just the skeleton. A beam or something fell 8-10 stories down and smacked the sidewalk alongside him. It brushed pretty close to him, but didn’t touch him, though a piece of the sidewalk was chipped off and flew up and hit his cheek. It only took a piece of skin off, but he still had the scar when I saw him. He rubbed it with his finger–well, affectionately–when he told me about it…He felt like somebody had taken the lid off life and let him look at the works.”

His life had been orderly, reasonable, and seemingly in control to that point, and he was shaken that chance could intersect one’s plot trajectory so suddenly and haphazardly and change everything. He decides to take the reins and change his life suddenly and haphazardly himself; live out his own “What if…” scenario. However, when detective Spade catches up to him, Flitcraft has basically fallen into the same life he had before: middle class career, wife, baby, and golf. Detective Spade comments:

“I don’t think he even knew that he had settled back naturally into the same groove he had jumped out of in Tacoma. But that’s the part of it I always liked. He adjusted himself to beams falling, and then no more of them fell, and he adjusted himself to them not falling.”

I am struck by how the “What If” Monster convinces Flitcraft to stop living his life, which causes pain and suffering to all those who are connected to his life narrative. The “What If” Monster wants us to believe that we are not resilient enough to deal with whatever happens in life. We can so quickly and easily be lured into living life looking backwards in the vain hope that we can control outcomes instead of becoming masters at adapting to outcomes. Asking “What if?” and even living out a “What if…” scenario can never lead us to utter certainty nor equip is to control when and how the shadow of death dogs us.

A friend and frequent commenter shared a poem with me from the late Professor Charles L. Black, Jr. This poem titled “Letting Go” was included in his obituary in the NYTimes and seems an appropriate response to the “What If” Monsters lurking in the corners of all our lives.

“In process of letting go the breath,

Moment for relieving your eyes’ ache,

You see bark patterns, a child’s hand

Catching and throwing, next to the tree.

You have to relive all your days

To receive the gift of surprise

At words you didn’t quite hear, once riding.

Do what you can; everything will come

In memory if never in experience.

Revisit, retell. Love sounds deeper

Out of time than in time. Act love

imperfectly; you will remember love itself.”

Instead of leaning into the lures of the “What If” Monster, I will act love imperfectly; for I will remember love itself.


What Kind of Bodies and What Kind of Planet Will We Have in The Future?

03.25.2011 12:33 PM

Are you ready for this?


Divorce in Rural America

03.24.2011 6:11 PM

A New York Times article today about the rising divorce rates in rural America (Once Rare in Rural America, Divorce is Changing the Face of its Families) talks about the growing marriage gap, yet fails to note one of its most tragic consequences—the effects on children.

Instead, the article trumpets the trend as a sign of rural women’s liberation. Like their urban counterparts, rural women are now “going to work, gaining autonomy, and re-arranging the order of traditional families.”

While some of these changes may be worth celebrating, any discussion of rising divorce rates seems superficial without at least a nod to the painful costs. I like how one commenter, LindsayLou from Pennsylvania put it:

“I often hear people saying that these stats are an example of the freedom that women have now, of the better lives we lead. As a woman, I do have a degree and a husband, and live in a rural setting, yet I am also a teacher. I am torn between the belief that these stats show a growing empowerment for women, while witnessing everyday what divorce does to the children. I always believed when I was in high school that divorce wasn’t a big deal, and that the children of divorce were ok. Now, as an adult, I can see first hand….they’re not. I see everyday the way these children have been affected, and it is rarely for the positive. As an English teacher the number one thing I hear about in student writing is the loss of a 2 parent household, and the damage it has caused them, even at 17 & 18. Something needs to be done to better promote positive marriages and to explain that divorce has very real repercussions for the children left after a split, no matter how old they are.”


Thirteen Year Old Fashion

03.22.2011 11:36 AM

Mini-prostitutes? A WSJ opinion piece muses why.


We’re Divorced and We Vacation Together

03.22.2011 11:35 AM

A new AP story.

If you can do this, you could have stayed married.


‘Trend Lines’

03.22.2011 11:27 AM

Child Trends has a new blog.


Maltese Divorce?

03.21.2011 4:01 PM

Malta will be having a referendum on divorce. David Quinn of the Iona Institute in Ireland, which introduced divorce 16 years ago, writes this piece for the Times of Malta.


If you’re in the Norfolk, VA area…

03.21.2011 3:34 PM

I’m presenting an evening session for parents on the topic of “Raising Children in a Divorced or Single Parent Home“ this Thursday (and a full day session for professionals the next day, which is already full) at Children’s Hospital of The King’s Daughters, sponsored by Kohl’s Cares.

Information is here (scroll down).


Women at MIT

03.21.2011 2:21 PM

…Yet now women say they are uneasy with the frequent invitations to appear on campus panels to discuss their work-life balance. In interviews for the study, they expressed frustration that parenthood remained a women’s issue, rather than a family one.

As Professor Sive said, “Men are not expected to discuss how much sleep they get or what they give their kids for breakfast.”

Hear hear.


A New Book About Divorce, for Grandparents

03.21.2011 12:09 PM

So many times over the years I have been approached by grandparents asking me what they can do to help their grown children and grandchildren as their grown child goes through a divorce. In our cultural debate about divorce, the grandparents are the unnoticed participants. Yet they are often on the front lines, caring sometimes or frequently for their grandchildren, helping out with finances, trying to help or trying to stay out of the way of their grown child’s relationship turmoil, and going through their own grief as they watch a marriage at which they had a wedding day front-row role come apart.

Now there is a wonderful book for them. Jolyn Rudelson has been writing for years, but this is her first book: It’s Not About You: A Grandparent’s Guide to Surviving Divorce in the Family. I had the pleasure of reading it in draft form and enjoying a long and wonderful lunch in Santa Monica a couple months ago with Ms. Rudelson and her dear friend.

If you or someone you know is a grandparent dealing with the divorce of their child, check out this book. You won’t be disappointed.

And stay tuned: We’ll soon have a new guest blogger at FamilyScholars. Guess who?


Bye Bye College, Hello Baby

03.21.2011 11:09 AM

In an interview with Laura—a 22 year-old engaged mother-to-be who grew up next to the baseball fields and across from the auto parts shop in Maytown, Ohio—I was struck by the tension she faced between her career dreams and her tight-knit family relationships.

Rather than summarize, I’ll let Laura speak for herself .

Me: “What do you think about motherhood? Is that something you’ve always wanted?”

L: “Everybody thought I’d be good at college, but to be truthfully honest I sucked in high school 
. So gettin’ into college, even just to think about it, was rough for me cuz 1) my family couldn’t really afford it. 2) there wasn’t really anything I wanted to do. I wanted to be a fashion designer, but I kinda listened to my mom and grandma on that one. I actually had a full ride scholarship to a design school out in California. And I actually ended up declining it because my mom and my grandma were like, ‘No, no. You need to do this.’ And me being the obedient child that I was I said no. Which I regret to this day. I wish I would have gone and come back and eventually found Toby [the man she is engaged to], but you know. He was also kinda
he didn’t know it at the time, but he was also kinda one of the reasons [that I didn’t go to California], cuz I didn’t want to leave him. Cuz I’d be all the way out in California learning this, and then I’d probably turn around and end up getting a job in California. So coming back home would have been hard. So it would have kept me away from him for a long, long time. Unless I came home for a visit and could take him back with me.” Read More


By 2030, 1 in 5 adults will be over 65 years of age

03.21.2011 10:42 AM

Holy Cow. 

In the past week, both the NYTime’s “The New Old Age” blog and the Washington Post printed articles highlighting a new trend in Emergency Room care: an ER department catered to the elderly.  As Dr. David John humoursly explains, “Old people are not just wrinkly adults.”  So true.

This next statistic quote in the Post article staggered me:

“Seniors already make 17 million ER visits a year, and 1 in 5 Americans will be 65 or older by 2030.”

And of course, as the articles aptly describe, the emerency needs, symptoms, and interventions of and for seniors, differ dramatically from a gun shot wound or car accident.

The ERs for the elderly sound quite calming and comforting:

“How does it work? Seniors still enter through the main ER, where triage nurses decide if they have an immediately life-threatening condition. Those patients stay in the regular ER with all its bells and whistles. But other seniors get the option of heading for these new special zones.

“It’s a very nurturing environment,” says nurse practitioner Michelle Moccia, who heads the senior ER at Trinity’s St. Mary Mercy Hospital in Livonia, Mich.

There, doors instead of curtains separate beds, tamping down the noise that can increase anxiety, confusion and difficulty communicating.

Nurses carry “pocket talkers,” small amplifiers that hook to headphones so they don’t have to yell if a patient’s hard of hearing.

Mattresses are thicker, and patients who don’t need to lay flat can opt for cushy reclining chairs instead; Moccia says people feel better when they can stay upright. Nonskid floors guard against falls. Forms are printed in larger type, to help patients read their care instructions when it’s time to go home. Pharmacists automatically check if patients’ routine medications could cause dangerous interactions. A geriatric social worker is on hand to arrange for Meals on Wheels or other resources.”

So, will an ER for the Elderly be coming to a hospital near you? 

If they have enough space and money!

And if by 2030, 1 in 5 adults will be over 65, they better start looking for money now.


And more

03.19.2011 11:50 PM


Pollution. Endocrine Disruptors. Health & Reproduction.

03.19.2011 11:20 PM

I’m going to let the San Francisco in me shine through.