Archives: October 2010

Funeral Fran’s Take on Cliches

10.30.2010 10:12 AM

Funeral Fran’s next question is inspired by a query concerning the use of cliches from one of our new Bereavement volunteers.  Our hospice offers a specialized training for those volunteers who feel called to serve the bereaved.  We offer support groups, one on one counseling, resources, and educational events to the family and caregivers for at least one year after the death of their loved one.  Our bereavement volunteers make supportive phone calls throughout that year, in an attempt to open the door to conversation that may assist in the grieving person’s journey of reconciliation and growth. 

Dear Funeral Fran,

My neighbor’s husband, Jim, died a few months ago.  We are not close friends, but I consider her a good neighbor. We wave cordially to each other each day as we leave for work or return home, but I feel like I should stop by and ask her how she is doing.  What should I say to her?  What if she starts crying? Is it okay to use clichés?  I believe that God doesn’t give us more than we can handle.  Is that true?

                                                                                                                                             Sincerely, “Looking for ways to love my Neighbor”

Dear Loving Neighbor, 

Whoa. Lots of deep questions in your questions. 

First of all, you should definitely stop by.  A wonderful way to begin would be to say, “Since Jim died in August, I have thought about you often. How are you today?” 

And then listen. Your neighbor doesn’t need to be fixed, but cared for. You can’t bring Jim back, but you can listen to how she is learning to live without Jim.  If she begins to cry, it’s best to simply put your hand on her shoulder or her hand, and let her cry.  Tears can often make us uncomfortable, especially if tears aren’t a normal coping response for us. If you feel you need to say something, you can say, “It’s okay to cry. Cry as much as you need.”  Tears can be a sign that she feels comfortable enough with you to be vulnerable.  What a gift.

But listening to someone is hard work, especially when we are not entirely comfortable with the subject matter. Just as becoming a proficient orator takes discipline and practice, alas so does becoming a proficient listener. We can struggle to listen fully to our well known friends and co-workers who could be sharing fairly banal, task-oriented, even humorous information, let alone know how to listen fully to someone who is suffering. And so, we start out with good intentions, we start to listen, and then there is SILENCE…and what do we do?  Ack! We must fill the silence!!! And hence, here comes the parade of clichés. 

Ah, clichés. So tempting to use, and yet how destructive they can be.  There are many clichés that are just not helpful, such as:

Р    Don’t cry.  You’ll make yourself sick

Р    See it as a challenge

Р    Cheer up.  It’s not the end of the world

Р    Time heals everything

Р    I know what you are feeling

Р    It’s God’s will

Р    You shouldn’t feel that way

Р    She’ll be better off dead

Р    Be positive.  Be brave.  Be strong.  (Be anything, so that I will feel better)

Р    You should see the way poor Anne died.  This is nothing

Р    Everything happens for the best

Р    It was his time

Р    You’re the little man now

Р    The good die young

Р    You can’t fall apart

Р    Keep a stiff upper lip

Р    Pull yourself together

Р    You can have other children

Р    The Lord never gives us more than we can handle

Р    Everything will be okay

Р    Let me know if I can do anything

Р    Be glad of the time you had with your loved one

Are some of these clichés true?  Yes, for some people.  And therein lies the tricky part of clichés. Just because a saying rings true for you doesn’t mean it is true for all people. 

You must first ask yourself if the cliché makes you feel better or her.  And my guess is that the cliché is meaningful and comforting to you.  Does God give us more than we can handle?  Some say yes, some say no.  If that belief is comforting to you, wonderful, but it may not be to her.  You might consider asking her if any clichés are comforting to her.  You might learn and also help her name a source of coping for herself.

Most importantly, simply tell the truth.  If you feel like you have said the wrong thing, simply say so.  For example, “I’m sorry.  I want to say the right thing but I don’t know what that is.”  Your genuine words and actions will comfort her in ways that the “right” words never could.

Sincerely, Funeral Fran

So, what cliches have been or are meaningful to you?


Is Marriage Still For Everyone?

10.28.2010 12:41 PM

Over at First Things, I have an essay in which I argue that, a changing economy notwithstanding, marriage remains a vital institution for people from all classes–including the less-educated. I also suggest that it’s precisely traditional norms like lifelong marriage and bearing children within marriage that helps maintain marriage as a broadly democratic institution.

Let me add something I didn’t get a chance to say in the essay, but that I think is important: the challenge for any compassionate and decent society is to maintain norms, while acknowleding that life is complicated. Thus, demonizing, say, single mothers or divorced persons, is unacceptable. Simply because we have norms does not mean we should bash other people. We can acknowledge the complexity of particular situations and still recognize the importance of social norms. But when divorce occurs, or when children don’t have a father–that’s still tragic. And surely we do not wish other people to experience tragedy–which is where norms come into play. They’re intended to steer us away from unhappiness, and towards the good life. If a norm doesn’t do that, we should abolish it.

As I see it, as long as humans experience the longing to make a complete gift of self to another person in love, and as long as the children of their union experience the longing for a mother and father, the norms of lifelong marriage and bearing children within marriage help us achieve those longings. They exist to bring those longings into fruition–and to mold them into something sturdy and enduring: namely, an intact family. That’s why we need those norms.


I Would Have Been Better Off

10.27.2010 3:18 PM

I’m in North Carolina, enjoying the company of a dear friend. Her roommates are all young women, between ages 19 and 24. They are in school and working, still very much on the verge of finding what it is they want out of life. “What are you going to school for?” I ask one of them. “I’m not really sure yet- just taking classes.” is a response. If people and personalities are like clay, and at birth our bodies are wet and malleable, and if with age we dry out and maintain the form our experiences have molded us into- then these girls are eager for structure and a sculptor’s enthusiastic hand.

“What do you do besides music?” one of my friend’s roommates asks. “Ummmm… I write about fatherlessness and father-lite-ness.” I tell her. This confession is always an invitation for people to talk about their families, which I love.

But this young lady’s response worried me- because I know that there are millions of women that are following her same logic. Her parents divorced when she was younger and she spent most of her time with her mother. Now, as a young adult- as she’s trying to figure out what she wants to do in life and who she wants to be- she finds that her father barely knows her. She feels like she is disappointing him by not pursuing the “right” career (a common theme for lots of young people). She wants to please her father. But she wants to be herself- and she is upset because she feels that “being herself” is in direct conflict with pleasing her father.

And then she said something that I dread is an incredibly common idea among young women. “I feel like I would have been a lot better off without any father at all.” she says.

I feel like I would have been better off without any father at all.

If millions of women feel this way, all of the technology is available for them to accomplish their dream. For the low low prices of just a few hundred dollars (minus all the headaches of dating) anyone (really, anyone! No background checks required!) can have their very own child, sans Dad.

Wouldn’t it be grand? No dating. No drama. No fights. No compromises. Total control over your child and your life. Hate negotiating? Hate compromises? Hate…. men? Have we got the sperm for you.

It seems divorce and our own disenchantment with our dads has led to a predictable idea about dads- they kind of suck. It must be better to have no dad if the alternative is at all like the one we grew up with.

What are we doing to define positive fatherhood and teach men how to be better fathers for their daughters so that when these girls grow up they don’t choose a donor over the real deal? What are we doing to preserve the worth and value of our men in a culture where women are really mad at their dads (or lack thereof)?


Make ‘Yer Fatherless or Motherless Child Right Here, Step Right Up

10.27.2010 2:18 PM

In London last Saturday, the “Alternative Families Show 2010″ — tickets just £10 each!

Demystifying the process of becoming a parent for the gay community and single people

Saturday 23rd October 2010 – 10am to 5pm
GRAND CONNAUGHT ROOMS
COVENT GARDEN, LONDON

• Thinking of becoming a parent?
• Want to understand the options available to you?
• Are you considering IVF, adoption or surrogacy?
• Want to understand your rights as a parent?
• Need help deciding on known or anonymous donors?
• Want to find support networks for same-sex parents?

The alternative families show brings together all the information you need to make informed choices on parenthood. Seminars run throughout the day on subjects from conception, adoption, legal rights, & support networks.  The show will give you access to information from top UK advisors in their field. A one-stop shop for the lesbian and gay community, this is your opportunity to get some real facts surrounding same-sex parenting. For single people we present the options to becoming a parent.  


Getting the Words Right

10.27.2010 2:13 PM

One of my frequent complaints about the gay marriage debate is how advocates of gay marriage often say that marriage will give a child “two parents” – i.e., that if you have a child and you marry someone else, that other person becomes a parent to your child.

In fact, among heterosexuals, in law and in practice, that is not what happens. When you have a child and marry someone else, that other person becomes a stepparent to your child.

These words matter. Social science research demonstrates that, for children, on a number of outcomes being raised in a home with your stepparent is on average not as beneficial as being raised with your own mom and dad. Yes, stepparents can be wonderful in the lives of children, but on average there are more problems. We cannot hope to get at the truth if we don’t even define and use our terms clearly.

Which is why I was heartened to see in a news article about Jane Lynch (of Glee fame, which I still have not seen!) that she is referred to as a “stepmother” to her new (female) married partner’s eight year old daughter. I’m even wondering if the use of the term “stepmother” here originated with Lynch herself, since it seems to have appeared in several places.

‘Course, I’m biased. I’ve thought Jane Lynch was hilariously cool and attractive ever since I saw Best in Show.


A Taste of Glee

10.27.2010 11:20 AM

Earlier this week I spoke with a producer of NPR’s On Pointe about a show they did yesterday on the sexualizing of teens as most recently seen in the GQ spread on several members of the Glee cast.  I ended up not being on the show since I am not an expert on the psychology of children nor on sex, but the conversation got me to thinking about our communal level of taste and what responsibility we as adults have for setting some bar of quality as to what is tasteful for our children.

Ironically enough, last night’s fabulous episode of Glee, or the Rocky Horror Glee Show as it’s affectionately called, focused on both these topics:  What is truly tasteful and what power adults, especially teachers, should have in, at least, not serving junk on a platter to youth.

I found myself laughing when I heard Coach Sue Sylvester opine negatively on the high school performing “The Rocky Horror Picture Show” in her Sue’s Corner segment on Glee’s local news show:

“Just because you’re free to say whatever you want, doesn’t mean you should.  Artists are free to push boundaries in order to make art, but when pushing boundaries is their only aim the result is usually bad art.”

Yikes, I thought, am I starting see things as Sue “C’s” it?

Coach Sue challenges Mr. Shue, the director of the Glee club and the school musical, because he isn’t doing the show for art’s sake but to try to win over the school counselor he is enamored with.  At the end of the episode, Mr. Shue cancels the public performance of the musical, but the cast performs for themselves nonetheless in order to reflect the spirit of the Rocky Horror; a show that brings together the eccentric misfits of life just as the Glee club unites a wide range of personalities in one love of song.

And so the power of adults to be adults and the freedom of kids to be kids is maintained, and yet the question of taste remains.

I think of the individuals we serve in hospice.  One common element of each care plan is some form of life review.  I often see that in looking back on a life lived, it is the moments of class and taste that are savored and the mere moments of impact, be they vulgar or immature or both, are the ones that are confessed, rued, and forgiven. I think of these young people starring in Glee and their soft porn appearance in GQ.  Did they make an impact? Sure.  But will that impact be lasting?  Not if we take a note from such performers as Brittany Spears or Madonna, who must continually re-market themselves in ever more shocking forms of vulgarity.  Are these pictures that they will cherish on their death beds as a lasting expression of their existence on this planet?  I imagine not.

Hopefully, as adults we are preparing our children to live not just to “live it up.”  They will find ways to “live it up” well enough on their own.  When I look at my own children, I’d far rather they live a life of taste and quality with enduring value than one of mere impact.


Baby Mama Drama

10.27.2010 9:56 AM

“So I met this guy whose name is Jim, and he’s got a daughter. And I was like, ‘Oh that’s cute, he’s got a daughter.’ You know, whatever. I am going through a divorce now because of him.”

Robin, age 25, pauses. Her words are thin, as if she is sputtering for breath after a long submergence under water. She sounds shocked, and almost surprised at what is happening to her.

Yet, Robin now says she should have seen it coming. She eloped with Tyler because she thought that if she married him, things would get better. But they didn’t. He threatened to divorce her two hours after they got their marriage license—because Robin didn’t want Tyler’s daughter to come stay with them on their wedding night.

“Our marriage was horrible. The relationship before was horrible, but I thought if I married him, it would change. No. It made it worse. Because he thought I’m his all the time. I was basically tied down with his little girl all the time, and her mom would call all the time and would come and cause these horrible problems [Jim eventually cheated on Robin with his ex, the mother of his child].”

Robin’s advice to women is clear: “And no matter what you do don’t get with a guy who has a daughter. He will choose her over you every time. If you’re standing in the street and you’re about to get shot, he’s not going to choose you, he’s going to pick her.”

When I read this quote to my husband, he said, “Well, of course a dad is going to choose his daughter.” Of course, naturally—just as a mother would choose her child over her spouse. It’s the sacrificial love of a parent. However, this sacrificial love becomes a problem when a child “belongs” to one parent, but not to the other.

The tensions of such a situation are often tragic.

Robin herself never knew her dad—the man who got her mom pregnant at age 16. So, she grew up with a step-dad who “picked on” her more than on her three step-siblings, all of whom were biologically his. While Robin claims that her step-dad, whom she calls dad, is a generally lovable man, sometimes he would beat her “to the point where [she could not] sit down at school” and her teachers would call children’s services. This kind of abuse never happened to her step-siblings.


Kidnapped at Disneyland

10.26.2010 1:16 PM

I’m driving South with my Swedish guest, enjoying the brilliant leaves I’ve never before seen during my childhood in California. We’re sharing stories and getting to know each other- inevitably we talk about our childhoods. “Have you ever been to Disneyland?” he asks me. “Of course,” I say. “You can’t call yourself an American if you’ve never been to Disneyland.” “A friend of mine knew a couple with two young children that went to Disneyland several years ago,” my Swede said.

He continued to tell me about how the couple lost their kids in the crowd. They went to the managers. They recruited people to help them look around the park. The kids were gone.  They weren’t even school age. “I wish I could tell you a happy ending to the story,” said my Swede. “But they never found the kids.”

This conjured some emotions for me of course. We continued to drive, while we reflected on what such an event meant for the parents and the children. Not knowing whether their children were dead or alive. Not knowing who had their children or what they were doing with them. We decided that’s probably one of the worst things that could happen to a couple.

And here comes my egg donation comparison…

Of course I began to think of my two children that I “donated” away (for lots of cash). I know they were born. I have reason to believe they’re still alive (though I can’t be positive). I don’t know anything about the people they are with now. The people they are with know everything about me, but I know nothing of them. Yet they are raising my genetic children. All I can do is hope that the children will come looking for me one day. In the meantime, there’s nothing I can do to find them and have a relationship with them.

Of course it’s my fault- I’m the one that agreed to the contract and conditions. I accepted my check. My circumstance is very different from the couple’s. But what if their children’s kidnappers had offered them $8,000 for each child? What if the kidnappers told the parents how much they really wanted their children and promised to take good care of them? The Swedish couple were obviously fertile. They could always make more.

What’s the true difference?


The Marriage Gap and Nonmarital Childbearing

10.26.2010 10:19 AM

Last Monday, a woman from Radio Free Europe called to talk to David and me about a new Pew Research Center Study, released on October 7th. It’s titled, “The Reversal of the College Marriage Gap” and its big find is this: “In a reversal of long-standing marital patterns, college-educated young adults are more likely than young adults lacking a bachelor’s degree to have married by the age of 30.”

 The question then is, “Why?”

 The study focuses on two factors:

 1.)    Increased Cohabitation

There has been close to a 130% increase in the number of cohabiting couples from 1996 to 2009, from 2.9 million to 6.7 million.

 2.)    Declining Annual Earnings of Less-educated Men

According to the National Center for Education Statistics, from 1990 to 2008, the median annual earnings of men ages 25-34 with only a high school degree declined from $36,300 to $32,000. Read More


Elder Mediators?

10.25.2010 1:13 PM

In today’s “The New Old Age” collumn in the NYTimes, Joshua Tapper chronicles the emergence of a “new” specialty field called “elder mediation.” He explains,

“It is no surprise to caregivers that as parents age, long-standing tensions can erupt into family discord. A 2001 study published in Conflict Resolution Quarterly found that close to 40 percent of adult children caring for a parent described “serious conflict” with a sibling, frequently the result of one sibling shouldering the bulk of caregiving responsibility.

Despite mutual concern for a parent’s well-being, adult children often have lived apart for decades and have little experience working together. Visits, end-of-life decisions and estate planning all become sources of sibling strife when old rivalries begin to play out, said Penny Hommel, co-director of the Center for Social Gerontology in Ann Arbor, Mich.“

A good mediator can delve right to the bottom of things, parse out the important issues and help the family deal with them,” said Ms. Rosenthal. “It’s different from therapy because it’s really about decision-making, not feelings and emotions.”

While there are no national statistics, elder mediators now practice in every state, charging clients from $150 to $500 an hour. And with no national standards, the practice differs from one mediator to the next.”

Hmmm…Questions that come to mind:

–Considering that according to a survey released by the Kaiser Family Foundation in July, more than one third of seniors mistakenly believe the reform law includes government “death panels,” why are lawyers less scary?

–Must all conflict resolution be professionalized?

–Should we all become elder mediators since this article doesn’t even touch on the future of caregiving which will include the generation of wide-spread family fragmentation?  You think you disagree with a sibling?  How about with your step mom? or your dad’s third wife? or your step sister?

–Would you rather discuss end of life choices with your physian? your spiritual guide aka pastor, rabbi, imam…? you elder mediator?


“Flocking”: The Young Adult Family Form

10.25.2010 10:37 AM

David Brooks’s column on Friday, “The Flock Comedies,” resonated with me. As I write this I happen to be sitting in a second-hand armchair in the trendy living room of a “flock” of my girlfriends from college—a fresh-cut rose scented candle emanates its incense from the IKEA coffee table, hard wood floors look vintage-worn, and teal bookshelves match round, framed glass mirrors that float on the wall like bath bubbles. It’s a Saturday night, and my friends are surfing the internet, grading papers (yes, first year teachers have to work on Saturday nights), and sipping Tazo tea. My Best Friend’s Wedding plays in the background for ambiance, although we all pause and look up to watch the dramatic ending. Afterwards, we pop in an episode of Golden Girls.  

Whereas 50 years ago we twentysomething women might have been sitting in the living rooms of our own homes with husbands in their lazy boys and children playing with GI Joes on the floor, today the “family life” of young twentysomethings is more likely to be our social life. We live far from our parents, who likely lived far from their parents (my mom is from Iowa, my dad from California, and I was raised in Ohio), and so we create our own “families” in the cities where we choose to enjoy our youth before settling down to create biological families of our own. Television mirrors that reality, and this is what Brooks’s column is about: today we have left the Cleaver’s and Cosby’s behind and welcomed non-biological “families” to the screen—that is, groups of unrelated and unmarried friends, or “flocks,” as Brooks calls them. He makes the point that modern friendship is evolving from fiercely loyal one-on-one relationships to complex friendship networks. Social networking technologies aid this development, Brooks notes, before hinting at the end of his piece that perhaps “people are trading flexibility and convenience for true commitment.”

Before I go on, let me just say that I love the flock I am a part of. I love my friends, I love living in New York City, I love spending Saturday nights with an eclectic assortment of emerging adults—nomads from Michigan and Florida an Read More


What the Mind Forgets…the Body Remembers

10.24.2010 4:30 PM

Saturday marked the day for a memorial service for beloved professor, mentor, colleague, friend, parent and spouse, Don Browning.  Elizabeth M. spoke and I was blessed to read her words via e-mail, hearing her voice in my mind sharing snapshots of his impact on her life.  Her final words stick with me,

 “In moments like these I take comfort that we are parts of one body, contributing something partial, stumbling towards a whole.  God knows who Don was. I am grateful to have known him too.”

Memorial services provide sacred, public space for the body of those who know and remember to come together to speak of the loss embodied in the individual who is now gone.

I first started thinking about how we embody loss over a decade ago when my friend Juli was murdered.  Juli and I danced together in college and our dance company was a tight-knit family—held together not only by the turbulent late teen years of discernment we experienced together, but also because we shared the dance. Dance is one of the few art forms where your body is the art.  We could spend up to 8 hours a day together in silence, our bodies our only mode of communication to each other, and eventually to an audience.  We knew each others bodies like our own, which made the torture and death of one of those bodies all the more acutely painful and terrifying. The awareness of the body’s utter vulnerability and fragility rose quickly to the surface of our minds and hearts.

Strangely enough, a biblical story of murder became a source of comfort: the story of Cain and Abel.  After Abel is murdered in Genesis, God confronts Cain and by saying, “Don’t you realize that your brother’s blood is crying out to me from the ground?!?!” I found great comfort in imagining the ways that our bodies can pray for us when our minds, mouths and hearts cannot.  I could imagine that when Juli was alone and scared, when there was no one there to help her, when she could not cry out to God nor to anyone who loves her, her blood, her body could cry out to God on her behalf.

The brokenness of bodies surrounds us everyday. Our obituaries cry out, telling the stories of bodies that age, bodies that faced serious illness, bodies that were vulnerable to the hateful actions of strangers or neighbors, bodies that killed themselves, but all bodies that die. As bodies are broken, we who are relatively whole in the snap shot of today, must remember that we are connected.  When one member suffers, we all suffer.  God calls out to us, “Don’t you realize that your brother’s/your sister’s blood cries out to me from the ground?”

Our bodies are a part of the body of humanity.  And though our minds and words can forget, may the body know and remember.


Boston Globe on three or more legal parents for kids

10.23.2010 7:49 PM

I think it’s a bad idea (my case for why it’s a bad idea in NYT a few years ago).

The Globe:

…Opponents of the change also worry that increasing the number of parents increases the odds of disagreements — over everything from where the child goes to school and what religion to raise him to how much time he spends with which parent — and the odds that those disagreements get litigated.

Whether or not multiple parentage gains wider legal and social acceptance, the fact that it’s being debated — and, in a few cases, allowed — suggests the flexibility that the concept of parenthood has taken on today, not only among scholars, but among adults doing the work of actually raising children in sometimes unorthodox situations.

“Expanding the number of parents that would have rights to a child could, on the upside, expand the number of people who have responsibilities to that child, but it also expands the number of people who have a claim on that child, and who could come into conflict with the other parents,” says Elizabeth Marquardt of the Institute for American Values…


Banning Same Sex Marriage Harms LGB People’s Mental Health

10.23.2010 6:39 AM

Psychology Today summarizes a study published this past March in The American Journal of Public Health.

Researchers analyzed data from LGB individuals who were interviewed in 2001-2002 and 2004-2005 for the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Because this is a national study, some of the participants lived in states that instituted constitutional amendments banning gay marriage following the 2004-2005 elections. Other participants lived in states where there was no change in the status of gay marriage.

The study found that Psychiatric Disorders, defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV, increased significantly between waves 1 and 2 among LGB respondents living in states that banned gay marriage for the following outcomes: any mood disorder (36.6% increase), generalized anxiety disorder (248.2% increase), any alcohol use disorder (41.9% increase), and psychiatric comorbidity (36.3% increase). In other words, there was more than a doubling in anxiety disorders among LGB people in states that passed anti-gay marriage laws. The scientists were able to rule out two alternative explanations for the pattern besides the direct effect of gay marriage bans on mental health. First, these psychiatric disorders did not increase significantly among LGB respondents living in states without constitutional amendments, which helps to rule out the possibility of the result being due to a national trend towards decreasing mental health in LGB individuals. Second, they found no evidence for increases of the same magnitude among heterosexuals living in states with constitutional amendments, which rules out the possibility that all individuals in those states were trending towards lower mental health.


Does Gay Marriage Prevent Gay Teen Suicide?

10.22.2010 3:29 PM

Maggie Gallagher has expressed, far better than I could have, exactly how I have felt watching the tragedy of gay teen suicides turned into a talking point or even a battering ram in the debate over gay marriage.

By MAGGIE GALLAGHER

October 20, 2010

Do I have blood on my hands?

Major gay-rights groups are saying so. Each of us who opposes gay mar riage, they say, is responsible for the terrible and tragic suicides of gay teens that recently hit the news.

San Francisco just filed a brief in the Prop 8 case, saying 7 million Californians who voted to protect marriage as the union of one man and one woman are responsible for high rates of suicide among gay people.

Evan Wolfson, one of the leading architects of the gay marriage movement, calls me out personally: “National Organization for Marriage Chairman Maggie Gallagher is among those who, with reckless disregard, attacks LGBT youth.”

Former Clinton adviser Richard Socarides told the AP these suicides demonstrate why gays should be allowed to marry: “When you speak out for full equality now, as opposed to partial equality, or incremental equality, you send a message to everybody, including the bullies, that everyone is equal.”

Apparently, either we all agree that gay marriage is good or gay children will die.

It’s a horrific charge to levy in response to some pretty horrifying stories. Will gay marriage really reduce or prevent gay teen suicide? I felt a moral obligation to find out.

Massachusetts has been tracking gay high school students for a decade using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Youth Risk Behavior Survey.

LGBT teens were roughly four times as likely as other students to attempt suicide in the last year. They’re also about twice as likely to report being in a physical fight at school, three times more likely to say they were injured by a weapon and almost four times as likely to say they missed school because they felt physically unsafe, compared to other teens.

These kinds of negative outcomes are consistent with the idea that anti-gay bullying is mainly responsible for the higher suicide rate among gay teens. But as I kept reading, I kept finding pieces of the puzzle that don’t seem to fit the “it’s homophobia pulling the trigger” narrative.

Gay students are also more than twice as likely to report having had sexual intercourse before age 13 — that is, to be sexually abused as children. They are three times as likely to report being the victims of dating violence, and nearly four times as likely to report forced sexual contact. A majority of LGBT teens in Massachusetts reported using illegal drugs in the last month. (Perhaps most oddly, gay teens are also three times as likely as non-gay teens to report either becoming pregnant or getting someone else pregnant.)

Forced sex, childhood sexual abuse, dating violence, early unwed pregnancy, substance abuse — could these be a more important factor in the increased suicide risk of LGBT high schoolers than anything people like me ever said?

The deeper you look, the more you see kids who are generally unprotected in horrifying ways that make it hard to believe — if you are really focusing on these kids’ well-being — that gay marriage is the answer.

And that’s exactly what the Youth Risk Behavior data also shows: In 2001, gay teens in Massachussetts were almost four times more likely to have attempted suicide (31 percent versus 8 percent). In 2007 — after four years of legalized gay marriage in that state — gay teens were still about four times more likely to attempt suicide than non-gay teens (29 percent versus 6 percent).

Whether you are looking at their faces or looking at the statistics, one thing is clear: These kids need help, real help. They should not become a mere rhetorical strategy, a plaything in our adult battles.

Each of these teens is a child of God. And each one deserves better from all of us than becoming a “teachable moment” in someone else’s culture war.


Experts

10.22.2010 3:09 PM

On the NYT op-ed page today two (male) behavioral psychologists partner with an illustrator to present an interesting graphic illustrating how physical changes in the design of a lunchroom can markedly influence children’s choices when it comes to eating more vegetables, fewer cookies, etc. Which is all very interesting. But one wonders how much money school districts pay consulting behavioral psychologists to give them insights practised by mothers the world over every day, that is, how to get your children to do what you want without telling them what to do.

(At dinner time I put the fresh vegetables on the table directly in front of my children and put the bread and butter on the other end of the table, or leave it on the kitchen counter. Consultancy fee, anyone?)


Presenting: The Anonymous Us Project Podcast

10.22.2010 10:55 AM

First ever podcast episode for The Anonymous Us Project.
This episode there are two stories: “Beginnings & Ends: A Matter of Parental Choice”, and “Silence”.


AnonymousUs.org in the blogosphere

10.22.2010 10:30 AM

A blogger at Babble writes:

…I think the website, which has only recently been launched, could become an incredible resource for those many people impacted by reproductive technologies. It’s beautifully done, with a whole lot of love


AnonymousUs.org

10.21.2010 11:53 PM

Are you a person who was conceived via sperm or egg donation or surrogacy?

Are you a surrogate, sperm or egg donor, or birth parent?

Are you a legal or social parent who has raised kids this way? A fertility industry professional?

Please tell your story at AnonymousUs.org. You do not have to — and in fact cannot — provide your name.

Tell your story so that others will too. There are sixteen stories at the site right now. Soon, with amazing content and a fresh design, it will go live. Stay tuned.


In Honor of Steven Nock

10.21.2010 11:31 PM

The September 2010 issue of Social Science Research presents papers in honor of the work of Steven Nock (a friend to many of us and UVA professor who passed away in 2008). Papers on marital dynamics, cohabitation, and the effect of marriage on people’s lives are authored by FamilyScholars blogger Brad Wilcox and other leading family scholars including Norval Glenn, Paul Amato, Daniel Lichter and Sharon Sassler, and Jeremy Uecker who is at Chapel Hill this year.