My Daddy’s Name is Donor is now available as an ebook!

Categories: My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies, The Future of Parenthood
Comments (0)
A powerful new documentary by Jennifer Lahl and the team that made Eggsploitation. The new documentary features interviews with many voices familiar to readers here at FamilyScholars, including Alana S., Stephanie Blessing, and me.
Are you in the NYC area? Go see it on January 29th at the Soho Digital Art Gallery. Screening times and information here. More screenings to follow at the same location that week, and more to come around the country.
You can also order the DVD.
Congratulations, Jennifer!
Categories: Fatherhood, My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies, The Future of Parenthood
Comments are Closed
In a comment at this post Barry Deutsch writes:
Although (as you know) I agree with you about many donor conception issues, I do have a criticism of “My Daddy’s Name is Donor.” Read More
Categories: My Daddy's Name is Donor
7 Comments (Comments are Closed)
At the present time, in the United States, if you apply to adopt and state that you plan to lie to your children about their origins for their entire lives, you will be told to learn more about adoption and the best interests of adopted children. Indeed, from my experience of American social workers, most would consider your intention to lie to your children about their origins a form of child abuse.
And yet, the infertility industry considers this a perfectly reasonable stance for parents using donor gametes. I can only conclude that infertility specialists, as a rule, are not friends with psychologists. Whether this is a by-product of their busy lives or perhaps an intentional rejection of the social sciences is difficult to say. However, the result of this highly unfortunate miscommunication between people who understand cell structures and people who understand human beings is that donor-conceived people are back where adoptees were fifty years ago – confused, traumatized and angry. And rightly so: confusion, trauma, and anger are appropriate psychological responses to being lied to by those closest to you.
This is one of the most articulate portrayals I have read of this current contradiction, including, as you so well put it, the only apparent conclusion one can reach that perhaps “infertility specialists, as a rule, are not friends with psychologists.”
For one who is so well-spoken, I was disappointed by your relative inarticulateness in trying to take on –something, I cannot exactly tell what — that you did not like in the piece I wrote and/or the reports it was based upon. Read More
Categories: My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies, The Future of Parenthood
7 Comments (Comments are Closed)
A couple of weeks ago I watched Style Networks “Sperm Donor” about a man who had produced over 70 kids through sperm donations. There was one conversation in the documentary that really stuck with me. It’s a dialogue between a single mom by choice and her daughter, about 6 years old I would guess. The mother says she always has been open with, and talked to her kids about how they were conceived.
This is a transcript of the talk the mother has with her daughter the day before they are going to meet the dad/sperm donor for the first time.
Mom: I wanna talk to you about going to meet Ben in Boston. Do you think that something might happen with mommy and Ben? Because he’s marrying another lady, who’s a very nice lady and he loves her a lot.
Daughter: So he’s gonna break up with you?
Mom: He’s not with me silly. Remember?
Daughter: So you already broke up?
Mom: Ok sweetie, so is he in our lives?
Daughter: No.
Mom: So how could we break up if he’s not in our lives?
Daughter: ‘Cause you’re married.
Mom: We’re not married. Why would you think that we would be married?
Daughter: Because you got the sperm!
Mom: How did mommy get the sperm?
Daughter: Google.
Mom: Google, that’s good.
Categories: Fatherhood, Marriage, Motherhood, My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies
8 Comments (Comments are Closed)
I’d like to start off by thanking Elizabeth for inviting me to be a guest blogger. For those who don’t know me (most of you) my name is Rickard Newman, I’m a recent transplant to New York and I’m engaged to Alana S. Since I met Alana I went from knowing nothing about the fertility industry to being knee-deep in near constant immersion in the topic. A year ago I didn’t even know there was such a thing as a fertility “industry”. Today I’m making my own documentary about it. Thank you for letting me share some of my thoughts with you.
Yesterday I watched the movie “Rise of the Planet of the Apes”. After being three feet away from a black back gorilla in Uganda earlier this year I now have to watch everything with big apes – real or computer animated, doesn’t matter. Unexpectedly I found a story that reminded me of something familiar, perhaps even with a lesson to be learned. Let me give you an introduction to the first 30 minutes of the movie.
A young genius scientist comes up with what he believes is the cure for Alzheimer’s. He tests his medicine on chimps and one of them shows outstanding growth of intelligence due to the healing effects the medicine has on its brain. But one day the chimp goes on a rampage for no obvious reason and security at the laboratory shoots it to death. The incident scares off investors of the project and the scientist is told to put all his apes to sleep. But he finds out that the reason the female chimp became so aggressive was because she tried to protect her newborn. The scientist takes the baby chimp home and raises it as his own child. He very quickly understands that the little one is extraordinarily intelligent and that it has genetically inherited this from his mother.
For the coming years the chimp, Caesar, is raised in the most loving home, with a lot of compassion and understanding – kind of the perfect home environment it seems. But as the chimp grows older he feels that he doesn’t fit in. He is a very troubled youngster and one day he confronts the scientist, through sign language, and asks him where he comes from. “Who is Caesar?” he signs. The scientist first says “I am your father”, but sensing Caesar’s dissatisfaction with the answer, takes him to his lab and shows him the laboratory to tell him about his mother. The monkey is perplexed by hearing about his conception story and is left with a lot of questions, an emptiness, a sense of not belonging that eventually turns into anger. The scientist “dad” is also troubled but insists that “he belongs with me, with us”. But it is too late. New technology with honorable intentions, and an upbringing full of love has nevertheless created an angry activist, a revolutionary that seeks justice and vengeance for having been stripped of family, freedom and dignity…
Categories: My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies
13 Comments (Comments are Closed)
Someone blogging as “Anonymous Sperm Donor” has used crass language to single out Wendy Kramer and the Donor Sibling Registry. He references a critique that Wendy Kramer and Eric Blyth wrote in BioNews last summer about our report, My Daddy’s Name is Donor.
After they published their critique, I responded in this piece at BioNews and on this blog to what I felt were unfair statements by them. And while I believe we continue to have some differences of opinion, I respect their work and expertise and feel that certainly if there is going to be a way forward on regulation in the US that Wendy Kramer is and will be a leader of that movement here.
Anonymous Sperm Donor, whoever you are, you’ll go further and achieve more in this debate if you’ll find better ways to express your concerns. Sometimes when I’ve overstepped the line of civility I’ve recognized it and apologized. Maybe you’d like to consider a better way to talk about Wendy Kramer and the DSR and offer her an apology too (and by the way, Eric Blyth really is a professor…why on earth give him grief for saying so?)
Categories: Civil Society, My Daddy's Name is Donor
5 Comments (Comments are Closed)
I recently spoke with Danielle, a single mom of two, about dads. In the conversation, she mentioned that she uses the phrase “sperm donor” to refer to deadbeat dads who don’t do anything except make the baby. She also hears other people use the phrase in the same way. For example, her boyfriend, who resents his dad for not being around much when he was growing up, bitterly calls his dad “sperm donor.”
It’s interesting that a euphemism like “sperm donor”—a word meant to evoke positive feelings by making men who sell their sperm sound like philanthropists—is also used as a slur to describe dads that shirk their responsibilities.
Categories: Fatherhood, Love & Marriage in Middle America, My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies, The Future of Parenthood
2 Comments (Comments are Closed)
There is no apparent way to reach them and make them fix it, but the group “Free Sperm Donations Worldwide- Private Sperm Donor Arrangements” has set up a Facebook page in which they have tried to take aim at me, but they’re so dim they can’t even figure out how to do it.
First, the quote they attribute to me was actually in a piece by lesbian mom Mary Bowers in the Windy City Times, which I linked to in the blog post they happened to see but apparently not read or understand.
Second, they claim that I am a supporter of The Child Listener group, when actually I am not a supporter of that group and have never suggested otherwise.
And finally they reprint Vince Londini’s bizarre BioNews piece critiquing our report, My Daddy’s Name is Donor. As I posted at the Family Scholars blog, earlier, in response to his piece:
The author, Vince Londini, seems not to have read, or at least, not to have read with any real attention, the section in our report called “Is Donor Conception ‘Just Like’ Adoption?” But you can read it, if you like, on pages 71-76, here.
Categories: My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies
5 Comments (Comments are Closed)
A new article in the John Marshall Law Journal, authored by Elizabeth Marquardt and Leah Ward Sears. The issue, volume IV, is just published and not yet available online. Among other things, the article reports data from a new study of young adults conceived through sperm donation, first released last year in the report, My Daddy’s Name is Donor.
Categories: Fatherhood, My Daddy's Name is Donor
Comments are Closed
Most paternal grandparents, who have experienced divorce in the family, learn quickly they are at a disadvantage in all things related to their grandchildren. They have less one on one time with their grandchildren, their rights for contact are questionable, and methods of communication are not always made available. Whatever those limitations, grandparents will do everything within their power to keep connections working between themselves and their grandchildren.
Although it is easy for paternal grandparents to feel unhappy about what they are missing, it helps if they focus on the opportunities of contact they do have when their grandchildren are with their father. There is no point in being resentful about the greater time grandchildren get to spend with the other side of their family. Grandchildren can only benefit from love they receive from both their mother and father’s side of their family.
The deprivation that paternal grandparents have resulting from divorce in the family is insignificant when compared to grandparents who are deprived of knowing or even knowing about offspring of their child conceived from sperm or egg donation. How many donor dads even share with their parents their intention to donate or that it is a fait accompli? Do those donors even consider the fact that they are depriving their parents of genetic offspring? Or is it because of the perceived reactions they do not tell them at all?
Grandparent are losing out on one of their most important roles, connecting their family generations: those who came before and those who will follow. In addition the paternal grandfathers are losing the right to have their name passed on, their only hope for immortality. It is as if the role of populating the earth is slowly being assumed by science, replacing the need for intimacy.
A Grandparent who feels a part of themselves missing is not feeling this loss alone. Many of the donor children who have been told of the method of their conception also feel a piece of themselves is missing. In the study “My Daddy’s Name is Donor” by Elizabeth Marquardt, Narvel Glenn and Karen Clark: nearly two-thirds agree, “My sperm donor is half of who I am.”
Donor children are being deprived of a connection to one half of themselves: not just from their donor dad but from his parents, their grandparents: those who genes are part of their genetic fingerprint. Their grandparents are being deprived of the joy of providing the genealogical background these donor children sometimes silently seek
As was reported in the above referred to study: many donor children, the older they get, seem to have a longing to fill in the picture of the other side of themselves. In the study, seventy percent agree, “I find myself wondering what my sperm donor’s family is like.” Sixty-nine per-cent agree, “I sometimes wonder if my sperm donor’s parents would want to know me.”
I wonder how many of grandparents who know they have living offspring out there somewhere, also long to know who and what they are like. As a grandmother, I feel the answer for most would be a resounding yes.
Tags: children of divorce, divorce, fathers, grandchildren, Grandparents, sperm donation
Categories: Fatherhood, General, My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies
9 Comments (Comments are Closed)
At NRO’s “The Corner” blog today I wrote this post about this op-ed that appeared in yesterday’s NYT, trying to give the poignant story told on the op-ed page a little more history and context, at least from my own point of view:
More than 15 years ago my colleague David Blankenhorn, in his book Fatherless America, argued that fatherhood was being fragmented. The emerging cultural view he documented was that children didn’t necessarily need their biological father in their home, married to their mother, caring for them. Rather, children could suffice with a “visiting” father, a “nearby guy,” or a “sperm” father.
The “sperm” father, Blankenhorn wrote, “completes his fatherhood prior to the birth of his child. His fatherhood consists entirely of the biological act of ejaculation. He spreads his seed, nothing more. He is a minimalist father, a one-act dad” (p. 171). more
Categories: Fatherhood, My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies
Comments are Closed
The movie, with a great team, coming soon.
Categories: Fatherhood, My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies, The Future of Parenthood
3 Comments (Comments are Closed)
A big, big day!
See Karen’s post below.
Here is the Vancouver Sun article:
VANCOUVER — A B.C.-born woman has won her court battle, resulting in a judge striking down the B. C Adoption Act as discriminatory and unconstitutional for offspring born as a result of anonymous sperm, egg and embryo donors.
Olivia Pratten filed the landmark lawsuit — the first of its kind in North America — to try to get the same rights as adopted children in learning about their biological parents when they come of age.
B.C. Supreme Court Justice Elaine Adair ruled Thursday in a 123-page decision that B.C. Adoption Act regulations were unconstitutional…
and from the same article:
…A study from the Commission on Parenthood’s Future found children conceived by sperm donation are more likely to suffer from isolation and depression, and are roughly twice as likely as biological children to struggle with substance abuse.
Such children have a unique and often isolating relationship to one’s self that others may not fully understand, the study found.
That study, co-investigated by me, Norval D. Glenn, and Karen Clark, available here.
Olivia Pratten, the plaintiff in the case, was a blogger here at FamilyScholars last summer.
Congratulations, Olivia and her team!
Categories: My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies, The Future of Parenthood
15 Comments (Comments are Closed)
In case anyone was wondering, the influential UK-based bioethics site, BioNews.org.uk, is still accepting rambling criticism of our My Daddy’s Name is Donor report released last summer. (The newest piece has the bizarre title, “My Daddy’s Name is Adoption.”)
(See my earlier rebuttal to a piece published there last summer, here.)
On November 2, 2010, Elizabeth Marquardt testified before the Australian Senate. Her remarks included this statement: ‘But I also want to make clear that – even with openness – the problems [allegations that donor-conceived children are more prone to social and legal trouble] do not completely go away. There seems to be something else about knowing that the person who raised you also deliberately denied you your other parent before you were even born’.
To those who know about donor conception, the words ‘deliberately denied you your other parent’ are striking. They seem to allege a wrong. This is no accident of wording, but a foreshadowing of Marquardt’s agenda of condemning all donor conception on the grounds that it denies the child access to his or her biological parents. This might be a respectable position, if Marquardt didn’t simultaneously praise adoption, despite the end result being the same…
The author, Vince Londini, seems not to have read, or at least, not to have read with any real attention, the section in our report called “Is Donor Conception ‘Just Like’ Adoption?” But you can read it, if you like, on pages 71-76, here.
Categories: My Daddy's Name is Donor
7 Comments (Comments are Closed)
FamilyScholars blogger Stephanie Blessing and I just got word that our paper was accepted, on this topic, to present at the Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity conference in Deerfield, IL this July. Come see us!
Categories: Faith and Families, My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies
2 Comments (Comments are Closed)
Went online today: Donor Conceived and Out of the Closet–The children of anonymous sperm donors are growing up, speaking out, and demanding rights in a forum fraught with controversy
I am going to ask them to correct how they summarize my SSM view — the fact that SSM does not “lead to natural procreation” has never come out of my mouth as a concern — but otherwise on the whole this is a really, really excellent moment.
Go AnonymousUs.org!
UPDATE: The reporter Alessandra Rafferty made the correction. Highly professional. It’s a great story and it’s currently featured, full screen, at the top of Newsweek.com right now. Kudos to her.
Categories: My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies, The Future of Parenthood
Comments (%) (Comments are Closed)
At Huffington Post I write about Alana and her new project, AnonymousUs.org. I hope you’ll check out the amazing stories at her site.
Now, anonymity is being turned on its head. This week saw the launch of the first-ever online story collective for donor conceived persons and others involved in reproductive technologies. AnonymousUs.org allows persons conceived through sperm donation and similar practices to tell their stories anonymously, without fear of hurting their parents, getting flamed on the Internet, or having to go on record about intimate details of their lives. The brainchild of donor-conceived activist Alana S. (who is also a blogger at the site I edit, FamilyScholars.org), AnonymousUs.org is already filled with powerful stories from donor conceived persons, donors, legal parents, adoptees, and others whose lives have intersected with these technologies….
Categories: My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies, The Future of Parenthood
3 Comments (Comments are Closed)
Have documents the world needs to see?
If hackers and the forces of Wikileaks can bust through Pentagon files and bring truth and transparency to the war in Iraq, Afghanistan, and numerous other hot bed issues- what else can it bring truth and transparency to?
I am following Olivia Pratten’s case in Canada over the legality of hiding or destroying documents that identify the biological parents of children born via sperm & egg donation. Read here. If you check out the comments section, you might notice the bulk of the attitude may be paraphrased as: Your donor chose to remain anonymous for a reason. How dare you sabotage his privacy …brat.
The public consensus (as I observe through the comments section) is hostile to the ideas people like Olivia Pratten, and all the rest of my fellow donor-conception activists represent. They are hostile because they can only relate to the donor’s perspective. They fear child support. They fear liability. They fear the guilt and dilemma of not knowing how to move forward in this new frontier where nobody seems to have good answers. They can’t fathom what it means to be responsible for a dynamic, real, human life. It is highly inconvenient for the donor when his/her genetic child arrives into their life (20 years after donation or so) and suggest some type of relationship (heaven forbid). For the public, ignorance and clean lines are best. News flash to anonymous sperm donors: nothing is a secret anymore. If people want to find out something, they will. And I assure you, people who have a deep-seeded need to know who their real parents are, will.
Wikileaks’ founder, Julian Assange ‘s response when asked about his “core values”:
Capable, generous men do not create victims, they nurture victims. That is something from my father and something from other capable, generous men that have been in my life.
Wikileaks says that it accepts “classified, censored or otherwise restricted material of political, diplomatic or ethical significance“.
There must be a donor kid among us that can also hack a system or two. If they can puncture The Pentagon’s main-frame, surely Valley Cryobank is doable too. In fact, I might make it a personal mission to stalk one of NYC’s hacker conventions and find myself a sympathetic computer genius to unveil the thousands of men who sold away their children via full support from the state.
Categories: Fatherhood, General, My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies, The Future of Parenthood
14 Comments (Comments are Closed)
In The Australian today, New South Wales legislative council government whip Greg Donnelly writes about Elton’s new baby, with reference to other sources including the “My Daddy’s Name is Donor” report.
…But perhaps the question that Zachary may ask himself time and time again is: Where is my mother? These may not be the first words he utters and no doubt he will have some carers who are female. However, there will come a time when the boy and indeed the man will surely want to know who his mother is, and where she is, notwithstanding the love and care his dads may provide…
Categories: Motherhood, My Daddy's Name is Donor, Reproductive Technologies, The Future of Parenthood
8 Comments (Comments are Closed)