Archives: Love & Marriage in Middle America

“There just wasn’t any rush”

05.27.2011 4:33 PM

A headline in yesterday’s New York Times read, “Married Couples Are No Longer a Majority, Census Finds.” The story noted a Brookings analysis of  census data that married couples represented 48 percent of American households in 2010, and quotes Red Families vs. Blue Families author June Carbone, who suggests that “Employment instability depresses marriage rates.”  Explaining the reasoning, Carbone says that “I can support myself and the kid, but not myself, the kid, and him.”

Employment instability surely is one factor that contributes to declining marriage rates, particularly among the non-college-educated. But it would be a mistake to suggest that it’s the only, or even primary, factor. For one thing, there’s the riddle that non-college-educated women are willing to take on the costs of raising children before marriage, but not willing to get married? If employment instability is really the primary concern on people’s minds, then why are non-college-educated women bearing children?

What do individuals cite as the reasons for not getting married? Florida asked this very question in their 2003 survey about individuals’ attitudes towards marriage. Theyincluded the following question to individuals who were in a relationship but not married (so this is presumably anyone who is in a relationship, not necessarily just cohabiting): ”Is this a major reason why you and your partner might not be planning to get married?” Table 41 at  this link lists the responses. Here are the top ten reasons that individuals cited:

“You both are happy the way things are”: 56 percent.

“You worry that the marriage would end in divorce”: 31 percent.

“The two of you are living apart”: 26 percent.

“Hasn’t come up or haven’t talked about it”: 25 percent.

“Not enough money in savings”: 18 percent.

“You don’t believe in marriage”: 16 percent.

“Too much arguing or conflict”: 16 percent.

“Questions about whether your partner is trustworthy”: 15 percent.

“You cannot afford a place to live together”: 11  percent.

“You don’t make enough money”: 10 percent.

It struck me that “You both are happy the way things are” was the top response. It reminded me of an interview I had with James, a 27 year old roofer who had been in a live-in relationship with his girlfriend for seven years before she broke up with him. I asked him why, five years into their relationship, they stil weren’t married. He kept on talking about the fact that “they weren’t in any rush”–that they both wanted to eventually get married, but things were going well, so why rush it?

Me: What would you say was the main reason for not rushing?”

James: Mainly probably because things were going so well. There just wasn’t any rush to do it…. Things were going really well… But, yeah, I think things were going so smoothly at the time, it’s just something we didn’t have to rush into … I think we kind of had that thought in the back of our heads that if we rushed into marriage that maybe things would kind of fall apart because we just kind of rushed into it, whereas we just kind of wanted to let life take us there. Do it when you feel the time is right, rather than puttin’ it on a calendar and just countin’ the days down.

Me: You said [divorce] was kind of a thought in the back of your head. Did you ever voice that to to each other. you know, ‘If we get married, it would put pressure on the relationship’?

James: Um, it’s something that we kept in the back of our heads, but we never really voiced it to one another about our relationship. But as I was sayin’ earlier, we seen people spend a large chunk of their life livin’ together with one another and then gettin’ married, then two years later just puttin’ up for reasons unknown. I’m sure we each knew what we were thinkin’, even though we didn’t specifically talk about our relationship. We kinda—I guess in a sense kind of compared our relationship to other people that we knew, like other older couples that we know that had gotten married and then a couple years down the road and had gotten divorced. And this is a man and a woman that got along really well. You know, livin’ together. They got a marriage license, they got married, then, like I said, reasons unknown, two years later they’re divorced. Things in their relationship mighta spun out of control.

As the above Florida data suggests, the lack of good-paying, stable jobs for non-college-educated young people surely contributes in some instances to young people’s hesitations to get married. But what the conventional wisdom often misses is how the normalization of sex and children outside of marriage “cheapens” marriage, so that young people sense no rush to get married. If we can have sex and children outside of marriage, and if we love each other and are committed to each other (at least we think we are), what is the “added value” of marriage?

Another important factor is what some scholars have referred to as “the long arm of divorce.” The Florida data–31 percent say they are not marrying anytime soon because they’re worried that their marriage will end in divorce–and James’ response bears this out:  James says while they never really articulated their fear that marriage would ruin their good relationship, he thinks they did have it in the back of their heads. “In the back of our heads”–it’s a telling phrase.

The point is this: “employment instability” is one of the factors that can help us to understand why young adults are opting–at least in their twenties–for cohabitation over marriage. But there are important cultural reasons to consider as well.


Those who Marry are Staying Married Longer

05.19.2011 5:27 PM

A Washington Post article yesterday (Number of long-lasting marriages in U.S. has risen, Census Bureau reports) reports that 75% of couples who married since 1990 reached their ten year anniversary. This is a three percentage point rise from those who married in the early 1980s.

Unfortunately, this might not mean much, since an increasing number of high school educated couples (who are three times as likely to divorce in the first ten years of marriage than their college educated peers) are choosing to cohabit rather than marry. Sociologist W. Bradford Wilcox explains:

“Marriage has become a much more selective institution in today’s society. People who are college-educated, more affluent or more religious are more likely to get married and stay married. People who are not are less likely to get married in the first place, and if they do marry, they’re more likely to divorce.”


Fragility

05.17.2011 6:30 PM

Today I was prepping for some follow-up interviews that I will be doing this summer with some of the participants in the Love and Marriage in Middle America Project. While browsing Facebook to find out who is still in Maytown for the summer, I found myself holding my breath with each profile page visit. All too often, my stomach fell, and then clenched into a knot, and then fell again—as if I were plunging headfirst down Cedar Point’s Millenial Force.

Todd and Becky—the young couple that invited us to their backyard wedding and then postponed it because Todd’s dad couldn’t get off work—relationship status: single. I want to protest: “But they were the ones who had let us borrow their copy of Nights in the Rodanthe with the promise that they would come visit us in New York sometime and get it back then.” I thought for sure that they’d be coming—they seemed so happy together, and I just couldn’t imagine them breaking up. They are both such nice, interesting people. Good natured, calm, hard-working, with plans for college and dreams of leaving their grocery store clerk and construction jobs. I think of the time that David and I hung out at their place for drinks and a movie, and I wonder who got their “baby” (the chocolate lab puppy they shared). 

Troy and Suzanne—the couple who both came from divorced homes and fiercely told us that they were going to get married and stay married because they didn’t want to do what their parents did. Relationship status: single. The wedding was supposed to be this summer. The Facebook album that Suzanne entitled, “My Soulmate,” and filled with pictures of her and Troy swapping saliva is deleted. Now the only pictures on Suzanne’s profile are of her daughter. 

Matt and Kristin—the couple whose wedding we attended and whose baby is now a month old. Relationship status: separated. She’s found someone else. He’s devastated, but she ignores his calls and wants him to stay away from their newborn daughter.

Mike and Brittney—the cohabiting couple with two toddler sons and a sunny yellow ranch that they rent each month. Relationship status: It’s complicated.

And, unfortunately, I could go on. With each relationship that shatters, I’m saddened. I feel like burrowing under my bedcovers and crying like a little girl who wants to live in a world of rainbows but only sees a cloudy, tear-streaked sky.

It’s especially hard to hear such news because I witnessed some of the beauty in each relationship, and the potential. I saw these couples when they were giggling, holding hands, vowing their love, flaunting their inloveness. They loved each other, they wanted to make it work, they had high hopes for the future. They weren’t dealing with situations of abuse, or complete incompatibility. Rather, they struggled to pay their bills (and yet were bombarded with messages about buying flat screens and iphones and new cars on credit). They struggled with personal demons and the fears they bring: absent fathers, painful divorces, cynical families. They struggled to stay faithful to the young families they’ve formed in a world with easy access to sleazy clubs and risquĂ© internet sites.

So many beautiful things are also fragile: a blue robin’s egg splattered on the pavement, my grandmother’s antique vase in pieces on the floor, a child’s bird-like bones fractured in a lime-green, Sharpie stained cast. And that’s why we have nests, and china cabinets, and elbow pads. And it’s also why we have marriage, with its mores of commitment. We protect what is sacred by building a safe place for beauty to thrive, despite its fragility.


Why A Soulmate isn’t Good Enough

04.27.2011 1:51 PM

David and I wrote this article to address the skepticism we’ve encountered about the institution of marriage, and to answer the question, “Why does marriage matter?”


Money Management for Unmarried Couples

04.07.2011 12:29 PM

There’s an interesting post today on one of my favorite personal finance blogs, Get Rich Slowly. In Financial Security for Unmarried Couples author Sierra Black talks about “the careful planning and legal documentation” that unmarried couples need in order to wisely manage their assets. Some things that happen automatically when a couple is legally married (legal rights to make decisions in case of death or illness, for example) take a little more initiative on the part of couples who chose to live in unmarried partnership.

Yet for many couples this added complication is no deterrent to settling on a comfortable cohabiting relationship in lieu of marriage. One couple in their mid-thirties explains:  

“We have no plans to get married in the future. We’re happy being unmarried to each other. Right now I feel like the most likely reason for us to get married would be if we had no other way to achieve some critical benefit associated with marriage, like if we had to get married to get our daughter health insurance. But so far nothing like that has come up.”

This reminded me of something I noticed last summer while interviewing young adults about their views on marriage. When asked if they plan to marry, people would either say, “Why get married?” or they’d say, “Why not?” Both groups acted as if the answer was obvious—the question seemed silly to them. For some, it was taken for granted that you marry the person that you love. For others, it seemed obvious that marriage is a path wrought with troubles and leading to divorce court.

When I dug deeper, people who took marriage for granted often cited emotional, legal, religious, or financial reasons for marriage. Those who didn’t see the point in getting married usually said that marriage wouldn’t change anything, but then sometimes went on to talk about some of the inconveniences of an unmarried partnership. For example, Sarah, a mother of three, talked about how even though her boyfriend of nine years had good benefits at his job, the couple shelled out a lot of money each month to pay for her insurance.  She told me that if they were married, they’d be saved this expense. Given her mother’s four marriages, though, it’s understandable that Sarah felt that a monthly insurance payment was small price to pay to avoid the cost of a potential divorce.


What’s in a Name?

04.01.2011 12:27 AM

The words that we use to name something matter. Names are our attempt to capture the essence of a thing (or sometimes to obscure it, as in the case of euphemisms like “ethnic cleansing”).

Given this, I’m interested in what young adults call their long-term, live-in partners. With this query in mind, I combed through some transcripts and reflected on past conversations, and I’m starting to notice a pattern that’s very interesting if it holds true—many unmarried couples that live together and plan on being together for the long-term think of each other as husband and wife instead of using innocuous terms like “significant other” or “partner.” Committed couples (who may or may not be planning a wedding anytime soon) often say that they are for all practical purposes already married: “We already act like we’re husband and wife. He calls me his wife. I call him my husband. So, we’re pretty much married just minus my ring,” says one twenty-two year old.

So why does this matter?

The fact that some young Americans who are choosing cohabitation over marriage still think in terms of “husband” and “wife” when they think of long-term commitment suggests that marriage as a concept still holds sway in the American imagination. While some young adults are rejecting the legal and religious aspects of marriage, they are not necessarily rejecting the idea of marriage. In an interview, one young man got angry about the role that society, religion, and the government play in marriage, yet he still upholds the ideal of marriage: “I don’t give a s*** if you’re ordained
.I’m married if I say I’m married.” The interesting thing is that he didn’t just say, “I don’t give a s*** if I’m married.” He wants to be married. He just doesn’t think it’s anybody else’s business to decide whether or not he is.

Rather than throwing the names husband, wife, and marriage out with the legal ceremony, many couples claim that these words meaningfully describe their relationship—not because of any public recognition, but because of their strong private love. To me, this clinging to the terminology of marriage suggests that young adults are not giving up so easily on the ideal of marriage, even while they are introducing the claim that they—apart from legal or religious authority—are the arbiters of their own marriages. The question is, can marriage maintain any coherent meaning when severed from its public aspects?


Divorce in Rural America

03.24.2011 6:11 PM

A New York Times article today about the rising divorce rates in rural America (Once Rare in Rural America, Divorce is Changing the Face of its Families) talks about the growing marriage gap, yet fails to note one of its most tragic consequences—the effects on children.

Instead, the article trumpets the trend as a sign of rural women’s liberation. Like their urban counterparts, rural women are now “going to work, gaining autonomy, and re-arranging the order of traditional families.”

While some of these changes may be worth celebrating, any discussion of rising divorce rates seems superficial without at least a nod to the painful costs. I like how one commenter, LindsayLou from Pennsylvania put it:

“I often hear people saying that these stats are an example of the freedom that women have now, of the better lives we lead. As a woman, I do have a degree and a husband, and live in a rural setting, yet I am also a teacher. I am torn between the belief that these stats show a growing empowerment for women, while witnessing everyday what divorce does to the children. I always believed when I was in high school that divorce wasn’t a big deal, and that the children of divorce were ok. Now, as an adult, I can see first hand….they’re not. I see everyday the way these children have been affected, and it is rarely for the positive. As an English teacher the number one thing I hear about in student writing is the loss of a 2 parent household, and the damage it has caused them, even at 17 & 18. Something needs to be done to better promote positive marriages and to explain that divorce has very real repercussions for the children left after a split, no matter how old they are.”


Bye Bye College, Hello Baby

03.21.2011 11:09 AM

In an interview with Laura—a 22 year-old engaged mother-to-be who grew up next to the baseball fields and across from the auto parts shop in Maytown, Ohio—I was struck by the tension she faced between her career dreams and her tight-knit family relationships.

Rather than summarize, I’ll let Laura speak for herself .

Me: “What do you think about motherhood? Is that something you’ve always wanted?”

L: “Everybody thought I’d be good at college, but to be truthfully honest I sucked in high school 
. So gettin’ into college, even just to think about it, was rough for me cuz 1) my family couldn’t really afford it. 2) there wasn’t really anything I wanted to do. I wanted to be a fashion designer, but I kinda listened to my mom and grandma on that one. I actually had a full ride scholarship to a design school out in California. And I actually ended up declining it because my mom and my grandma were like, ‘No, no. You need to do this.’ And me being the obedient child that I was I said no. Which I regret to this day. I wish I would have gone and come back and eventually found Toby [the man she is engaged to], but you know. He was also kinda
he didn’t know it at the time, but he was also kinda one of the reasons [that I didn’t go to California], cuz I didn’t want to leave him. Cuz I’d be all the way out in California learning this, and then I’d probably turn around and end up getting a job in California. So coming back home would have been hard. So it would have kept me away from him for a long, long time. Unless I came home for a visit and could take him back with me.” Read More


A Simple Somersault

02.24.2011 8:51 PM

In a previous post, Elizabeth Marquardt mentions a lovely quote that seems to “evoke the assumptions of an earlier era” by describing the transition from girlhood to womanhood as the “simple somersault by which a young girl becomes a wife and mother
”

The contrast between this and the description of “pre-adulthood” in Kay Hymowitz’s piece in the Wall Street Journal today is stark. To me, the first image conjures something like an icon of the Madonna—a woman with the flush of youth and babe in arms—while the second makes me think of city grime, long workdays, late nights out, and the confusion that so many of us twentysomethings struggle to tame as we agonize over the future. Most weeks I have at least one friend who is deciding whether or not to move to a different city to chase a better position, whether or not to propose to or break up with his long-term girlfriend, whether or not to move to Brooklyn or find a place in Harlem or Washington Heights when the lease is up, whether or not to move closer to family or stay in New York, whether or not to keep waiting tables or to look harder for something else. With this constant flurry of motion, Hymowitz comments that “it’s no wonder that so many young Americans suffer through a ‘quarter-life crisis.’”

Yet while for a segment of young adults pre-adulthood is the norm, Hymowitz notes that “pre-adulthood is a class-based social phenomenon, reserved for the relatively well-to-do.” In those well-to-do circles, the script of college then career often means that “‘what you do’ is almost synonymous with ‘who you are,’ and starting a family is seldom part of the picture.” 

On the other hand, for those in small town Middle America who do not usually partake of the pre-adulthood phenomenon (at least not to the same degree) the case is often reversed: family defines you, and what you do matters only in so far as it helps you to support that family.   

This doesn’t mean that these Middle Americans don’t have plans to finish college or start careers. They just have plans to do so during or after they have children. Erin, a 24 year old who finished college while she was a single mother and is now married to the father of her second child, pities those who wait to start  families:

“And then [after they’ve established careers] they’re probably going to be really close to not being able to [have children] and then that’s gonna really suck in their lives when it comes around. Because you know that’s gonna be really hurtful to them. You know, ‘Why didn’t I do that?’ I think in my head that’s what I think that they would be doing, you know, regretting that decision that they didn’t have children.”

Ally, a 29 year old who currently works as a nurse’s aid and whose youngest child is just about ready to go to school, is getting ready to go back to school herself. Ally recently married her fiancĂ© of 10 years and father of her three children, and has this to say about her educational goals:

“I was going to go to college, but I decided I’d start a family first. Because I figured, you know, if you’re young and you have a family first, then you can get that out of the way and then you can have like [makes a “sheesh” sound] 50, 60 years to work!”

Ally is smart, creative, multi-talented, and competent: it was not for want of potential that she delayed her professional life in favor of family (although it was in part for lack of funds). She just sincerely wanted to make having a family her first priority.

I know that to many Ally’s logic will seem entirely foreign, impractical, and perhaps even ludicrous. And of course we could have a lengthy discussion about the benefits of finishing school before having children (for one it’s just a lot easier, although I know women who have done it the other way around with a great deal of gracefulness—and I have much respect for them). We could also talk about the need to find ways to help Middle Americans achieve their educational goals without accruing loads of debt, which will just make the family lives they prize all-the-more difficult.

Yet setting that discussion aside for another time, I can’t help but compare the “simple somersault by which a young girl becomes a wife and mother” that I saw in the lives of Erin and Ally, with the chaotic identity-seeking of a pre-adulthood defined mostly by career-building, which is often a lonely ordeal. For Erin, Ally, and many others in Middle America, having children is the most important, most natural, and most fulfilling thing to do in their twenties. And while in reality sometimes this “simple somersault” becomes a tragedy more complex than the self-saturated quandaries of pre-adulthood, I’m not sure that wanting to establish a family early (even if it does push the limits of the prevailing orthodoxy) is such a bad thing.


Building a Nest Egg: Thrift and Marriage

12.13.2010 4:35 PM

Does a widespread cultural embrace of thrift really matter?

As part of our Nest and the Nest Egg Initiative, the Institute for American values “is dedicated to exploring and promoting the best ways to strengthen marriage and thrift as broadly achievable pathways into the American middle class.” Reviving a culture of thrift will help families to thrive, and could help diminish the growing gap between upscale and downscale America.

While it runs the risk of reading like an old-fashioned parable on the virtues of thrift, I’d like to share a true tale of modern-day thrift.

Carissa is a 31 year old mother of two, the daughter of a single mom from a low-income background. As a girl of 14 Carissa waitressed at a restaurant after school to pay for her school supplies and clothing, which her mother couldn’t afford to buy. At 17, while on spring break, Carissa found out that she was pregnant. Fortunately, she and her boyfriend, Matt, who was also from a low-income family, had saved up $12,000 during high school. (Both Matt and Carissa were remarkably determined to save: Matt had plans for college, and Carissa wanted to leave her childhood poverty behind.) They had been planning on getting married after graduation, and were saving as much of their tip money as possible so that they could have a wedding and raise a family comfortably. Carissa remembers that in her determination to save, she didn’t let it phase her when her friends mocked her for buying a used car for $2,000 instead of purchasing something nicer. She had money in the bank, and that’s what she cared about. Read More


Is Marriage Becoming Obsolete?

11.24.2010 5:23 PM

 David and I blogged on the Time/Pew study at National Review’s The Corner.


Marrying Alone: The Collapse of the Extended Family

11.16.2010 6:52 PM

As I was listening to an interview today with Anna, a 23 year old stay-at-home mom who is married to a 30 year old cook at a local diner, I was reminded of the importance of having a social network—even better, of having a tight-knit group of kin. When I asked Anna if it was difficult financially for her to stay at home, this is what she said:  

“Everybody has a little financial problems. You just do your best
.Before I was pregnant, we had a chance to sit down and go over this: diapers, wipes, and bottles, and then we sit down and times it by two! [she chuckles, looking at her growing belly, since she is pregnant with their second child] But I mean going into it, like honestly, like I told you, we have such a big family and friends that I didn’t have to buy anything for like four or five months. Yeah like the first diaper was when she was like four months
.I still have stuff from my baby shower from her. And I like, can use some of the stuff for the new baby. Like we had everything bought and paid for for us. It was really nice.”

Anna calls her mom “psycho grandma” because of all that she does to help out with the baby, both financially and time-wise. Unfortunately, Anna’s situation—having a network of helpful family and friends that all live close by—seems relatively rare.

Extended families used to provide the connectedness, support, and sense of belonging that online social networking tries to supply today. Rather than uploading pictures onto Facebook so that old college roommates volunteering in Africa, Grandmas knitting in Iowa, and siblings in school in Hawaii can ooh and ahh at baby Isaiah, family members used to be able to stop by after dinner to join you on the front porch and take a turn caring for their newest and littlest kin. Read More


Baby Mama Drama

10.27.2010 9:56 AM

“So I met this guy whose name is Jim, and he’s got a daughter. And I was like, ‘Oh that’s cute, he’s got a daughter.’ You know, whatever. I am going through a divorce now because of him.”

Robin, age 25, pauses. Her words are thin, as if she is sputtering for breath after a long submergence under water. She sounds shocked, and almost surprised at what is happening to her.

Yet, Robin now says she should have seen it coming. She eloped with Tyler because she thought that if she married him, things would get better. But they didn’t. He threatened to divorce her two hours after they got their marriage license—because Robin didn’t want Tyler’s daughter to come stay with them on their wedding night.

“Our marriage was horrible. The relationship before was horrible, but I thought if I married him, it would change. No. It made it worse. Because he thought I’m his all the time. I was basically tied down with his little girl all the time, and her mom would call all the time and would come and cause these horrible problems [Jim eventually cheated on Robin with his ex, the mother of his child].”

Robin’s advice to women is clear: “And no matter what you do don’t get with a guy who has a daughter. He will choose her over you every time. If you’re standing in the street and you’re about to get shot, he’s not going to choose you, he’s going to pick her.”

When I read this quote to my husband, he said, “Well, of course a dad is going to choose his daughter.” Of course, naturally—just as a mother would choose her child over her spouse. It’s the sacrificial love of a parent. However, this sacrificial love becomes a problem when a child “belongs” to one parent, but not to the other.

The tensions of such a situation are often tragic.

Robin herself never knew her dad—the man who got her mom pregnant at age 16. So, she grew up with a step-dad who “picked on” her more than on her three step-siblings, all of whom were biologically his. While Robin claims that her step-dad, whom she calls dad, is a generally lovable man, sometimes he would beat her “to the point where [she could not] sit down at school” and her teachers would call children’s services. This kind of abuse never happened to her step-siblings.


The Marriage Gap and Nonmarital Childbearing

10.26.2010 10:19 AM

Last Monday, a woman from Radio Free Europe called to talk to David and me about a new Pew Research Center Study, released on October 7th. It’s titled, “The Reversal of the College Marriage Gap” and its big find is this: “In a reversal of long-standing marital patterns, college-educated young adults are more likely than young adults lacking a bachelor’s degree to have married by the age of 30.”

 The question then is, “Why?”

 The study focuses on two factors:

 1.)    Increased Cohabitation

There has been close to a 130% increase in the number of cohabiting couples from 1996 to 2009, from 2.9 million to 6.7 million.

 2.)    Declining Annual Earnings of Less-educated Men

According to the National Center for Education Statistics, from 1990 to 2008, the median annual earnings of men ages 25-34 with only a high school degree declined from $36,300 to $32,000. Read More


“Flocking”: The Young Adult Family Form

10.25.2010 10:37 AM

David Brooks’s column on Friday, “The Flock Comedies,” resonated with me. As I write this I happen to be sitting in a second-hand armchair in the trendy living room of a “flock” of my girlfriends from college—a fresh-cut rose scented candle emanates its incense from the IKEA coffee table, hard wood floors look vintage-worn, and teal bookshelves match round, framed glass mirrors that float on the wall like bath bubbles. It’s a Saturday night, and my friends are surfing the internet, grading papers (yes, first year teachers have to work on Saturday nights), and sipping Tazo tea. My Best Friend’s Wedding plays in the background for ambiance, although we all pause and look up to watch the dramatic ending. Afterwards, we pop in an episode of Golden Girls.  

Whereas 50 years ago we twentysomething women might have been sitting in the living rooms of our own homes with husbands in their lazy boys and children playing with GI Joes on the floor, today the “family life” of young twentysomethings is more likely to be our social life. We live far from our parents, who likely lived far from their parents (my mom is from Iowa, my dad from California, and I was raised in Ohio), and so we create our own “families” in the cities where we choose to enjoy our youth before settling down to create biological families of our own. Television mirrors that reality, and this is what Brooks’s column is about: today we have left the Cleaver’s and Cosby’s behind and welcomed non-biological “families” to the screen—that is, groups of unrelated and unmarried friends, or “flocks,” as Brooks calls them. He makes the point that modern friendship is evolving from fiercely loyal one-on-one relationships to complex friendship networks. Social networking technologies aid this development, Brooks notes, before hinting at the end of his piece that perhaps “people are trading flexibility and convenience for true commitment.”

Before I go on, let me just say that I love the flock I am a part of. I love my friends, I love living in New York City, I love spending Saturday nights with an eclectic assortment of emerging adults—nomads from Michigan and Florida an Read More


A Night Out with Tucker Max: Ramblings on Emerging Adulthood

10.12.2010 2:04 PM

Lindsey was pumped to see Tucker Max. I texted her to see what she wanted to do, and she texted me, “Well along the lines of your relationship study there is an author in town. Tucker Max. Who is probably the most vulgar man in the world. Talking about his newest release a** holes finish first.” When I told her I’d love to come, she said, “Wa man fer real? It’s in Hyde Park on 2692 Madison Rd. Joseph Beth book store. There may be protesters
he’s that bad. Starts at 7 pm.” On the day of, she texted me “ZOMG!! I’m excited for today!” For all his vulgarity, Lindsey is a huge fan, in part because of his honesty and because “girls love a**holes.” Read More


Why is Cohabitation the Norm?

10.07.2010 4:02 PM

An October 6 Newsweek story, “Does ‘Living in Sin’ Still Lead to Divorce?” suggests that a main driver of cohabitation is “money, not romance.” The journalist quoted the U.S. Census family demographer Rose Kreider, who noted recent data showing that whereas in 2008 59 percent of cohabiting couples were employed, that number fell to 49 percent in 2010. Of course it’s possible that unemployment may help explain the change, but it’s also possible that more cohabiting people just happen to be unemployed.

Why am I skeptical? In our interviews with middle class and working class young people ages 20-34 in Ohio the last several months, my wife and I are not hearing financial instability as the reason why people decide to cohabit. Sometimes they’ll delay getting married because they want to save up money for a nice wedding, but even then they talk about it more in terms of “what’s the rush?” and “It’s important to take your time” than “we don’t have the money.”  For instance, one 29 year old working class young man I talked lived with his partner for six years. Why didn’t they get married? He had a tough time answering that question. It wasn’t financial stability, he made clear–he made sure he was financially stable before they moved in. If anything, he says, it might have been a subconscious fear that getting married would ruin the good relationship they had going. He pointed to one of their good friends: they enjoyed a good cohabiting relationship for five years, but when they got married, everything seemed to go south. They divorced two years later. Maybe, he speculates, marriage puts a pressure on relationships that cohabitation doesn’t. He thought a little more and said he wasn’t sure why they didn’t get married. “We just weren’t in a rush,” he said.

Another middle class young man, 25, has lived with his girlfriend for five years. He has a stable, good paying job–he works for an IT consulting firm. They own their own home. And he just recently bought a sporty new BMW. Finacial instability is clearly not an issue for them. What’s keeping him from getting married, then? Again, he was just about as stumped as I was, but after thinking a little bit, he ventured the following:

“When the thought of marriage comes up—which it frequently does now, I think everyone pretty much expects us to get married—and I don’t
I don’t know what it is. I can’t say that I don’t want to marry her, you know, for any particular reason, but at the same time I’m very reluctant about it. Uh, just because, uh, I don’t know. It just seems like, “Wow, that—that’s a big move, really.” But at the same time we’ve been living together for five years. We essentially live quite a married life. But for some reason, it’s a topic I don’t like to talk a whole lot about with her or with other people. And my rationale when that comes up is just that, you know, I don’t, uh, I’m not 100% ready yet. I know that sounds bad at the time, but it’s true
. I know she’s been ready for a while and jokes about it all the time and would have no hesitation if I brought it up
.Maybe it’s the fact that, I’d say uh
 there’s so many attractive women out there that you see on a regular basis, and even though I don’t really have feelings for them, maybe that has something to do with it. It’s like, uh, a subconscious feeling of being, uh, completely 100% committed. Not that I’ve ever or would do anything to compromise my current relationship, it’s just the fact that it’s not bound by formal
by formal means. And that’s speculation, it could be one of the reasons. But yeah, I definitely try to evade the topic.”

These two anecdotes I’ve shared are typical of the stories we’re hearing. My impression is that a lot of young people don’t think very consciously about whether to live together or not–it just happens. And if there’s no norm against it, why wouldn’t you? I think this is what University of Denver family scholar Scott Stanley has termed, “sliding” into a relationship, versus “deciding.” If young people do give a reason, more often than not, they cite the high divorce rate, inability to trust themselves and/or their partner, and the desire to experience the freedom of their twenties as the reasons why they cohabit instead of get married.

Also, if we want to understand what’s mainly driving cohabitation, I think it’s more helpful to read this article, “I Don’t: The Case Against Marriage.” Ironically, it’s also in Newsweek and was prominently linked in the first Newsweek article I mentioned. The two authors, both educated women, conclude that “marriage is–from a legal and practical standpoint, anyway–no longer necessary.” They cite the high divorce rate as the reason why they’re “cynical” about marriage and, with longer lifespans today, voice skepticism whether lifelong monogamy to one person is a realistic proposition (something I’m beginning to hear more frequently).

Are there couples who decide to cohabit because of financial instability? Yes, of course there are. But based on my conversations with young people, I don’t think it holds nearly as much explanatory power as many family scholars, demographers, and economists think it does. If you don’t believe me, go into the nearest cafe or bar where there’s a lot of twentysomethings, and ask them why they’re opting to cohabit instead of marry.


On Divorce and “The Mission”

10.04.2010 4:49 PM

Meet Jeffrey Morgan. He’s only 31, but he owns a McMansion in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in town, Hilltop Trails. Overlooking the working class part of town, the neighborhood boasts million dollar homes and its own golf course. Jeffrey graduated with two bachelors degrees and, until the financial crisis, worked for Goldman Sachs in New York City. He married at 26 and now has two children, who are 3 and 1.

While Jeffrey harbors a farily strong institutional view of marriage, that attitude is coupled with ambivalence towards divorce.

“What advice would you give a friend, married for ten years, who is now unhappy and professes to be in love with another woman?” I ask.

“Seek out counseling,” he suggests, and adds, “Try to see if there’s something there that they can salvage.” However—and this is where the ambivalence enters—some “marriages are beyond repair, and it’s probably healthier that they don’t continue, you know, whether it’s for the sake of the children or the individuals.” A person should ask himself this question, he suggests: ”Is there a spark?…. Or are we so distant that it’s not going to work out?” Read More


Love and Economics: Does the Recession Delay Marriages?

10.01.2010 10:03 AM

The headline in a recent USA Today article read, “How the recession has changed us.” One of the ways the recession is changing us, the article explained, is that people are now delaying marriage. It notes that the latest Census data finds that for the first time since the government began keeping track, there are now more unmarried adults ages 25-34 than there are married adults in that same age range. What explains the trend? “It’s kind of an adaptive response to the lack of jobs and economic uncertainty,” explained Mark Mather, a demographer at the Population Reference Bureau.

 I hear this explanation all the time: the economy is bad, therefore young adults are having a hard time finding jobs, therefore they are delaying marriage. It seems plausible, but it is an explanation that sounds to me like a half truth. It does not resonate, because it is not what I am hearing from young adults here in Ohio. Let me explain. Read More


Roger and Nancy on the Meaning of Marriage

09.24.2010 11:08 AM

Amber and I had lunch today at Bob Evans with Roger and Nancy, both of whom grew up in Maytown, Ohio, the town where we’re working on the Love and Marriage in Middle America study. Roger, 64, joined the military after graduation from high school and retired from General Motors. Nancy, 59, graduated from the University of Cincinnati and became a social worker.

In an effort to better understand the way young people today think about marriage, we asked for Roger and Nancy’s opinion of the way young people today view marriage. I presented a hypothetical scenario in which a young person is cohabiting, but nervous about getting married—whether because of the prevalence of divorce, lack of financial stability, and/or (especially for the guys) the possibility of finding a more attractive partner in the future. Roger looked confused and thought for a moment. “I’m having a hard time understanding what you’re saying,” he said slowly, “because it’s so in conflict with the way I was trained
just like my parents, you got married and that was it. If the love is there, it should overcome the rest.” He explained that, in his opinion, if love comes first, then the compatibility will follow, and anyway, you don’t have to worry about the economics of it because nowadays you have two people working towards it. “Marriage back then was a solution and the answer,” he continued. “But today marriage might be a solution, but not the answer. Because today people have mobility and independence. Back then [early 1960’s] 
 you wanted to graduate, get married, have kids, and die.” Read More