<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Family Scholars &#187; Fatherhood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://familyscholars.org/category/fatherhood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://familyscholars.org</link>
	<description>Engaging the Key Debates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 14:01:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;In sperm banks, a matrix of untested diseases&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/15/in-sperm-banks-a-matrix-of-untested-diseases/</link>
		<comments>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/15/in-sperm-banks-a-matrix-of-untested-diseases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Marquardt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyscholars.org/?p=10084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In New York Times today: Sperm donors are no more likely to carry genetic diseases than anybody else, but they can father a far greater number of children: 50, 100 <a href="http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/15/in-sperm-banks-a-matrix-of-untested-diseases/">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <em>New York Times</em> today:</p>
<blockquote><p>Sperm donors are no more likely to carry genetic diseases than anybody else, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/15/health/in-sperm-banks-a-matrix-of-untested-genetic-diseases.html?_r=1&amp;src=dayp">but they can father a far greater number of children: 50, 100 or even 150, each a potential inheritor of flawed genes, and each a vector for making those genes more pervasive in the general population</a>.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/15/in-sperm-banks-a-matrix-of-untested-diseases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Are Dads the New Moms?&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/14/are-dads-the-new-moms/</link>
		<comments>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/14/are-dads-the-new-moms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Marquardt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Future of Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyscholars.org/?p=10080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Susan Gregory Thomas at the Wall Street Journal: Even as men have made great strides as fathers, however, they can find themselves rudderless as spouses. &#8220;We&#8217;re getting a new cultural <a href="http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/14/are-dads-the-new-moms/">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan Gregory Thomas at the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Even as men have made great strides as fathers, however, they can find themselves rudderless as spouses. &#8220;We&#8217;re getting a new cultural script for a &#8216;new dad&#8217; but not for a &#8216;new husband,&#8217; &#8221; says W. Bradford Wilcox, director of the University of Virginia&#8217;s National Marriage Project. &#8220;That married people with children now often refer to themselves as a &#8216;stay-at-home mom&#8217; or &#8216;stay-at-home dad&#8217; instead of as &#8216;wife&#8217; or &#8216;husband&#8217; signals that <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304451104577392261536405038.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories">we now prioritize parenthood over marriage itself</a>.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>For more, see State of Our Unions 2011, <em><a href="http://stateofourunions.org/">When Baby Makes Three: How Parenthood Makes Life Meaningful and Marriage Makes Parenthood Bearable</a></em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/14/are-dads-the-new-moms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The mirror that is Nadya Suleman</title>
		<link>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/11/the-mirror-that-is-nadya-suleman/</link>
		<comments>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/11/the-mirror-that-is-nadya-suleman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 18:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Marquardt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Future of Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyscholars.org/?p=10056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In HuffPo, Roland Warren of the National Fatherhood Initiative has an interesting piece suggesting that what we find repellant about &#8220;Octomom&#8221; is what she reflects back to us about our own <a href="http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/11/the-mirror-that-is-nadya-suleman/">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In HuffPo, Roland Warren of the National Fatherhood Initiative has an interesting piece suggesting that what we find repellant about &#8220;Octomom&#8221; is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/roland-c-warren/octomom_b_1498079.html">what she reflects back to us about our own cultural choices</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/11/the-mirror-that-is-nadya-suleman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More than just Teething Troubles</title>
		<link>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/09/more-than-just-teething-troubles/</link>
		<comments>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/09/more-than-just-teething-troubles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 01:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amber Lapp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Childhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love & Marriage in Middle America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyscholars.org/?p=10024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We tend to think of romantic relationships as between two individuals. But when they fall apart, it becomes obvious that there is no such thing as two lone lovers. Families, <a href="http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/09/more-than-just-teething-troubles/">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We tend to think of romantic relationships as between two individuals. But when they fall apart, it becomes obvious that there is no such thing as two lone lovers. Families, children, friends are all implicated in the breakup.</p>
<p>Today on my way to the grocery store I talked on the phone with Megan, a 24 year old woman that I interviewed in Ohio and who has since become a friend. She and her fiancé, Troy, recently broke up. He told her—the day after they had just finished paying off her wedding dress—that he just wasn’t happy in the relationship anymore.</p>
<p>She’s since posted on Facebook a photo of her, him, and her newborn daughter (they started dating when she was eight months pregnant) at the hospital with this caption: “I’m missing this so much! I hope he comes back!”</p>
<p>Veronica, Megan’s one year old, hopes Troy comes back, too. Although he’s not her biological father, he was the first person to hold her after Megan’s c-section, and he spoke to her while she was in the womb. Megan tells me that Veronica, who is just starting to talk, has been saying “da-da” often and asking for him.</p>
<p>Veronica also has been asking for “pawpaw,” Troy’s dad. Troy’s parents tell Megan that they still want to be nana and pawpaw to Veronica—and Troy’s dad’s Facebook is still plastered with photos of his “granddaughter”—but one can imagine the complications, especially considering that Troy still lives with them. In fact, Troy’s mom is stopping by tomorrow to give Megan back the baby items that they kept for Veronica at their home.</p>
<p>On top of all this, Veronica is teething, and so she hasn’t been feeling well or sleeping well. Megan notes, sadly, that Veronica hasn’t been acting herself. She thinks that it’s more than just the teething—she thinks she’s been missing the man she knows as &#8220;da-da.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/09/more-than-just-teething-troubles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For My Dad</title>
		<link>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/06/for-my-dad/</link>
		<comments>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/06/for-my-dad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 04:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Blessing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aging, Disability, Death, Dying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyscholars.org/?p=9973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My dad died two weeks ago. His health had been declining due to PSP for about seven years. My mother called me on a Thursday to tell me that my <a href="http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/06/for-my-dad/">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My dad died two weeks ago.</p>
<p>His health had been declining due to <a href="http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/psp/detail_psp.htm" target="_blank">PSP </a>for about seven years. My mother called me on a Thursday to tell me that my dad wasn’t doing well and on Friday she called back to say that we probably ought to come see him, that it wouldn’t be long before he would pass away. We got there on Saturday and he was in that coma-like state that often precedes death. He lived until the following Saturday, never waking up and only opening one eye once, a few hours after I got there.</p>
<p>The night before the funeral, my husband sat down with my mom and asked her some questions about my dad in preparation for officiating my dad’s funeral. My mom told my husband about the time that my dad saved my grandmother, his mother-in-law from drowning when no one else saw her go underwater and not come back up. My grandmother came to see my dad the morning before he died, and thanked him again for saving her more than four decades earlier.</p>
<p>Mom told him about how my dad worked until late into the evening shortly after they were married, but one night didn’t come home. So after waiting for him for a couple of hours, she walked down the street to a store to a pay phone to call her father-in-law to tell him that my dad was missing. As she was on the phone, she saw my dad drive by. Once she got back home, he explained that he had stopped to help a man on the side of the road who had run out of gas. My mom was worried sick, but my dad was just helping a stranger out. He did things like that often over the years.</p>
<p>We told my husband about driving through Oregon when I was about 10. We came upon a man who had just had a motor cycle accident on a two lane road in the middle of nowhere and so we stopped to pick him up and take him to the nearest hospital, even though we were on a vacation.</p>
<p>I remember hearing about how, shortly after moving to Tennessee from Dallas, my dad was nearly run over on the street outside his office building because he was walking with a black woman to go get lunch. I suppose the driver thought that my dad and his coworker were a couple and wanted to convey that that sort of thing wasn’t tolerated in this city.</p>
<p>I remember realizing that there were certain derogatory words that were suddenly part of the everyday speech that I heard in our new town that I had never heard at home, and I was proud that I’d never heard those words come from my parent’s lips.</p>
<p>My dad taught me right from wrong; there were morals to live by and you always did the right thing, even if no one was watching because integrity was important.</p>
<p>I remember how protective my dad was of me; he knew how the world operated and he wanted to keep me as safe as possible from harm. I thought of it as smothering, but I also knew that he loved me. I was glad for his rules, even as a kid.</p>
<p>When I was about 17, I was invited to go take a ride with a friend and her boyfriend. I did NOT want to do this because I didn&#8217;t trust their driving skills, so I told them I&#8217;d have to ask my dad, certain that he would tell me no. He told me I could go, much to my chagrin. Later, I told him that I really wanted him to tell me no so that I could use him as an excuse to stay out of a dangerous situation. I think I really shocked him! He told me that if I were in that situation again, I was free to say that my dad wouldn&#8217;t want me to do whatever it was that I didn&#8217;t want to do, so that he wouldn&#8217;t give me the wrong answer again!</p>
<p>I remember a conversation in the car when he told me how much he loved my mom. He would come home from work around the time that she would start cooking, and would put his arms around her and kiss her neck while she cooked. My sister and I would make gagging noises, but I secretly loved to see him show her affection.</p>
<p>I also remember having The Talk with my mom when I first learned about sex, but a couple of years later, I got The Talk again from my dad, who wanted me to know how boys thought, and not just how their bodies work. I still laugh when I think about how uncomfortable he was with that brief monologue.</p>
<p>We had another Talk during my early teen years about God. I remember thinking that this particular talk must be as difficult and uncomfortable for him as The Other Talk was. I think he felt like he needed to talk to me about God, even though he didn’t go to church.</p>
<p>When I was about 17, he started going to church with my mom, sister, and me. We never really talked about God much, even then. But he was proud of me when I decided to go to a local Christian liberal arts college. I became a Christian during my freshman year, and began to get involved in Bible studies and fell in love with theology. My mom told me the night before the funeral that my dad was impressed with how I studied Scripture. I never knew that <em>I</em> had made an impression on <em>him</em>!</p>
<p>I’m not sure what he thought when I moved back to Dallas at 20 years old to marry a boy who was a youth minister. My mom said that he cried when I left home. But he gave my husband his blessing when asked for my hand in marriage.</p>
<p>My children will have no memories of my dad when he wasn’t using a walker or bed-ridden. My youngest two may have no memories of him at all as they get older. But when they are older, I’ll remind them of how, just a few weeks before he died, they sat on his bed feeding him M&amp;Ms. And when I hear Unchained Melody, I’ll tell them how much he loved that song. And one day, when I get my dad’s Bible, I’ll show them the leather Bible cover that he made and tooled by hand. I’ll show them the craftsmanship and the intricate designs that he chiseled into the leather with no pattern to follow. I’ll tell them how talented he was and how his dad taught him to tool saddles in west Texas.</p>
<p>They’ll know how much my dad loved Texas because of the Texas soil that I have in a little glass bottle…a little portion of the soil that each of us sprinkled onto my dad’s vault after he was lowered into the ground.</p>
<p>But mostly, I’ll tell them how much he loved each of them. And I’ll tell them how much I loved him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/06/for-my-dad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many persons are conceived via sperm donation in the U.S. annually? Nobody knows.</title>
		<link>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/04/how-many-persons-are-conceived-via-sperm-donation-annually-nobody-knows/</link>
		<comments>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/04/how-many-persons-are-conceived-via-sperm-donation-annually-nobody-knows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 18:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Marquardt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Future of Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyscholars.org/?p=9960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And in a new piece at BioNews, Wendy Kramer persuasively argues that what we don&#8217;t know should be the big story. In 1988 the Office of Technology Assessment estimated that <a href="http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/04/how-many-persons-are-conceived-via-sperm-donation-annually-nobody-knows/">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in a new piece at BioNews, Wendy Kramer persuasively argues that what we <em>don&#8217;t know</em> should be the big story.</p>
<blockquote><p>In 1988 the Office of Technology Assessment estimated that 30,000 children were born via donor insemination during the year 1986/87 in the US (1).</p>
<p>A quarter of a century &#8211; and no further research &#8211; later, &#8217;30,000 annual births&#8217; is still trotted out in academia, lectures and the media (2). Sometimes the number is doubled, probably to allow for the passage of time, and occasionally a range of 30,000 &#8211; 60,000 is deployed.</p>
<p>Yet so much about donor insemination has changed during this time. Using either of the whole figures is scientifically unjustifiable, and the range is just as flawed.</p>
<p>Hence, experts should not be using such patently erroneous figures. Rather, they should be noting that there is no reliable method of assessing how many children are conceived via donor insemination each year. They should be pointing out that the USA has no accurate tracking or record keeping from which it is possible to make an educated assessment.</p>
<p>Instead of complacently relying on outdated best guesstimate figures from more than a generation ago, they should be demanding reliable, recent figures. They should be voicing outrage that neither the fertility industry nor any other entity is required to collect data or report statistics on the numbers of human beings conceived using donor sperm. This is in stark contrast with cattle insemination, which is much more tightly regulated and surveyed. <a href="http://www.bionews.org.uk/page.asp?obj_id=2567#BMS_RES">more</a></p></blockquote>
<p>In our report, <em><a href="http://familyscholars.org/my-daddys-name-is-donor-2/">My Daddy&#8217;s Name is Donor</a></em>, we also cited the 30-60,000 number as the experts&#8217; best guesstimate. And believe me, if you try to tell a reporter that there really are no numbers the first reaction you get is that you must not know what you&#8217;re talking about. You can sense their fingers creeping along the figurative Rolodex to call their next source.</p>
<p>But Kramer is right. The big story should be that we don&#8217;t know the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/04/how-many-persons-are-conceived-via-sperm-donation-annually-nobody-knows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wouldn&#8217;t you love to be a writer for Law and Order?</title>
		<link>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/04/wouldnt-you-love-to-be-a-writer-for-law-and-order/</link>
		<comments>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/04/wouldnt-you-love-to-be-a-writer-for-law-and-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 18:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Marquardt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Future of Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyscholars.org/?p=9958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This episode sounds fascinating. Though, sadly, it&#8217;s reminiscent of a true situation that happened recently in which some jerk contacted donor conceived persons telling them he was their father. Detectives <a href="http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/04/wouldnt-you-love-to-be-a-writer-for-law-and-order/">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode sounds fascinating. Though, sadly, it&#8217;s reminiscent of a true situation that happened recently in which some jerk contacted donor conceived persons telling them he was their father.</p>
<blockquote><p>Detectives Benson (Mariska Hargitay) and Amaro (Danny Pino) investigate the disappearance of a teenaged girl after her young brother calls 9-1-1. While Fin (Ice-T) and Rollins (Kelli Giddish) look into a possible abduction, <a href="http://allthingslawandorder.blogspot.com/2012/04/law-order-svu-father-dearest-episode.html">they discover the girl had been searching for her biological father, an anonymous sperm donor</a>. The investigation takes a startling turn when a suspect is found to be targeting several young, vulnerable women, all with the same personal connection. But the suspect isn’t what he seems, and Dr. Huang (Wong) must delve into his past to save the women. Guest Starring Eric Close and James Van Der Beek. Also starring Richard Belzer (Sergeant John Munch.)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://familyscholars.org/2012/05/04/wouldnt-you-love-to-be-a-writer-for-law-and-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OK?</title>
		<link>http://familyscholars.org/2012/04/30/ok/</link>
		<comments>http://familyscholars.org/2012/04/30/ok/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Marquardt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Future of Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyscholars.org/?p=9887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new story posted at the Anonymous Us Project: First they said we would be ok because at least we&#8217;d know who are mothers are. Then they said we&#8217;d be <a href="http://familyscholars.org/2012/04/30/ok/">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new story posted at the Anonymous Us Project:</p>
<blockquote><p>First they said we would be ok because at least we&#8217;d know who are mothers are.</p>
<p>Then they said we&#8217;d be ok so long as our parents tell us we were donor conceived.</p>
<p>Now they say we&#8217;ll be ok so long as our parents tell us we are donor conceived and we can access the identities of our biological donor parents.</p>
<p>When are they going to work it out that we&#8217;ll only be ok if they admit that donor conception is not ok?</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll be ok when society recognises the hypocrisy of recognising the importance of biological familial relationships and then saying they aren&#8217;t important if you&#8217;re donor conceived.</p>
<p><a href="http://anonymousus.org/stories/index.php?cid=2">We&#8217;ll be ok when we are permitted to grieve that loss</a>. To say it out loud. And have open ears receive the words without retribution.</p>
<p>Ok?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://familyscholars.org/2012/04/30/ok/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just curious? Or more?</title>
		<link>http://familyscholars.org/2012/04/30/just-curious-or-more/</link>
		<comments>http://familyscholars.org/2012/04/30/just-curious-or-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Marquardt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Future of Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyscholars.org/?p=9884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A question posted at Yahoo Answers: I have two moms and am constantly wondering what it would be like to have a father and who my biological dad is. I&#8217;m <a href="http://familyscholars.org/2012/04/30/just-curious-or-more/">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A<a href="http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120424095830AAOR8zp"> question </a>posted at Yahoo Answers:</p>
<blockquote><p>I have two moms and am constantly wondering what it would be like to have a father and who my biological dad is. I&#8217;m wondering is there any way to find who he is?</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://familyscholars.org/2010/07/17/%e2%80%9ccurious%e2%80%9d-a-response-to-a-new-publication-on-persons-conceived-via-sperm-donation-to-lesbian-mothers/">Just curious? Or hurting badly?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://familyscholars.org/2012/04/30/just-curious-or-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who gets the sperm?</title>
		<link>http://familyscholars.org/2012/04/30/who-gets-the-sperm/</link>
		<comments>http://familyscholars.org/2012/04/30/who-gets-the-sperm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Marquardt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Future of Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyscholars.org/?p=9878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Canadian court in British Columbia has ordered a separating lesbian couple to divide 13 vials of sperm: Assuming it is not possible, or that it is impractical, to divide <a href="http://familyscholars.org/2012/04/30/who-gets-the-sperm/">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Canadian court in British Columbia has ordered a separating lesbian couple to <a href="http://www.vancouversun.com/health/Court+orders+former+lesbian+couple+divide+leftover+sperm/6525516/story.html">divide 13 vials of sperm</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Assuming it is not possible, or that it is impractical, to divide one sperm straw in half, I award seven sperm straws to the claimant, J.C.M., and six sperm straws to the respondent, A.N.A.,&#8221; [Justice] Russell wrote.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://familyscholars.org/2012/04/30/who-gets-the-sperm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

