Archives: Fatherhood

‘In sperm banks, a matrix of untested diseases’

05.15.2012 10:07 AM

In New York Times today:

Sperm donors are no more likely to carry genetic diseases than anybody else, but they can father a far greater number of children: 50, 100 or even 150, each a potential inheritor of flawed genes, and each a vector for making those genes more pervasive in the general population.


‘Are Dads the New Moms?’

05.14.2012 2:52 PM

Susan Gregory Thomas at the Wall Street Journal:

Even as men have made great strides as fathers, however, they can find themselves rudderless as spouses. “We’re getting a new cultural script for a ‘new dad’ but not for a ‘new husband,’ ” says W. Bradford Wilcox, director of the University of Virginia’s National Marriage Project. “That married people with children now often refer to themselves as a ‘stay-at-home mom’ or ‘stay-at-home dad’ instead of as ‘wife’ or ‘husband’ signals that we now prioritize parenthood over marriage itself.”

For more, see State of Our Unions 2011, When Baby Makes Three: How Parenthood Makes Life Meaningful and Marriage Makes Parenthood Bearable.


The mirror that is Nadya Suleman

05.11.2012 2:13 PM

In HuffPo, Roland Warren of the National Fatherhood Initiative has an interesting piece suggesting that what we find repellant about “Octomom” is what she reflects back to us about our own cultural choices.


More than just Teething Troubles

05.09.2012 9:50 PM

We tend to think of romantic relationships as between two individuals. But when they fall apart, it becomes obvious that there is no such thing as two lone lovers. Families, children, friends are all implicated in the breakup.

Today on my way to the grocery store I talked on the phone with Megan, a 24 year old woman that I interviewed in Ohio and who has since become a friend. She and her fiancĂ©, Troy, recently broke up. He told her—the day after they had just finished paying off her wedding dress—that he just wasn’t happy in the relationship anymore.

She’s since posted on Facebook a photo of her, him, and her newborn daughter (they started dating when she was eight months pregnant) at the hospital with this caption: “I’m missing this so much! I hope he comes back!”

Veronica, Megan’s one year old, hopes Troy comes back, too. Although he’s not her biological father, he was the first person to hold her after Megan’s c-section, and he spoke to her while she was in the womb. Megan tells me that Veronica, who is just starting to talk, has been saying “da-da” often and asking for him.

Veronica also has been asking for “pawpaw,” Troy’s dad. Troy’s parents tell Megan that they still want to be nana and pawpaw to Veronica—and Troy’s dad’s Facebook is still plastered with photos of his “granddaughter”—but one can imagine the complications, especially considering that Troy still lives with them. In fact, Troy’s mom is stopping by tomorrow to give Megan back the baby items that they kept for Veronica at their home.

On top of all this, Veronica is teething, and so she hasn’t been feeling well or sleeping well. Megan notes, sadly, that Veronica hasn’t been acting herself. She thinks that it’s more than just the teething—she thinks she’s been missing the man she knows as “da-da.”


For My Dad

05.06.2012 12:27 AM

My Father's Daughter

My dad died two weeks ago.

His health had been declining due to PSP for about seven years. My mother called me on a Thursday to tell me that my dad wasn’t doing well and on Friday she called back to say that we probably ought to come see him, that it wouldn’t be long before he would pass away. We got there on Saturday and he was in that coma-like state that often precedes death. He lived until the following Saturday, never waking up and only opening one eye once, a few hours after I got there.

The night before the funeral, my husband sat down with my mom and asked her some questions about my dad in preparation for officiating my dad’s funeral. My mom told my husband about the time that my dad saved my grandmother, his mother-in-law from drowning when no one else saw her go underwater and not come back up. My grandmother came to see my dad the morning before he died, and thanked him again for saving her more than four decades earlier.

Mom told him about how my dad worked until late into the evening shortly after they were married, but one night didn’t come home. So after waiting for him for a couple of hours, she walked down the street to a store to a pay phone to call her father-in-law to tell him that my dad was missing. As she was on the phone, she saw my dad drive by. Once she got back home, he explained that he had stopped to help a man on the side of the road who had run out of gas. My mom was worried sick, but my dad was just helping a stranger out. He did things like that often over the years.

We told my husband about driving through Oregon when I was about 10. We came upon a man who had just had a motor cycle accident on a two lane road in the middle of nowhere and so we stopped to pick him up and take him to the nearest hospital, even though we were on a vacation.

I remember hearing about how, shortly after moving to Tennessee from Dallas, my dad was nearly run over on the street outside his office building because he was walking with a black woman to go get lunch. I suppose the driver thought that my dad and his coworker were a couple and wanted to convey that that sort of thing wasn’t tolerated in this city.

I remember realizing that there were certain derogatory words that were suddenly part of the everyday speech that I heard in our new town that I had never heard at home, and I was proud that I’d never heard those words come from my parent’s lips.

My dad taught me right from wrong; there were morals to live by and you always did the right thing, even if no one was watching because integrity was important.

I remember how protective my dad was of me; he knew how the world operated and he wanted to keep me as safe as possible from harm. I thought of it as smothering, but I also knew that he loved me. I was glad for his rules, even as a kid.

When I was about 17, I was invited to go take a ride with a friend and her boyfriend. I did NOT want to do this because I didn’t trust their driving skills, so I told them I’d have to ask my dad, certain that he would tell me no. He told me I could go, much to my chagrin. Later, I told him that I really wanted him to tell me no so that I could use him as an excuse to stay out of a dangerous situation. I think I really shocked him! He told me that if I were in that situation again, I was free to say that my dad wouldn’t want me to do whatever it was that I didn’t want to do, so that he wouldn’t give me the wrong answer again!

I remember a conversation in the car when he told me how much he loved my mom. He would come home from work around the time that she would start cooking, and would put his arms around her and kiss her neck while she cooked. My sister and I would make gagging noises, but I secretly loved to see him show her affection.

I also remember having The Talk with my mom when I first learned about sex, but a couple of years later, I got The Talk again from my dad, who wanted me to know how boys thought, and not just how their bodies work. I still laugh when I think about how uncomfortable he was with that brief monologue.

We had another Talk during my early teen years about God. I remember thinking that this particular talk must be as difficult and uncomfortable for him as The Other Talk was. I think he felt like he needed to talk to me about God, even though he didn’t go to church.

When I was about 17, he started going to church with my mom, sister, and me. We never really talked about God much, even then. But he was proud of me when I decided to go to a local Christian liberal arts college. I became a Christian during my freshman year, and began to get involved in Bible studies and fell in love with theology. My mom told me the night before the funeral that my dad was impressed with how I studied Scripture. I never knew that I had made an impression on him!

I’m not sure what he thought when I moved back to Dallas at 20 years old to marry a boy who was a youth minister. My mom said that he cried when I left home. But he gave my husband his blessing when asked for my hand in marriage.

My children will have no memories of my dad when he wasn’t using a walker or bed-ridden. My youngest two may have no memories of him at all as they get older. But when they are older, I’ll remind them of how, just a few weeks before he died, they sat on his bed feeding him M&Ms. And when I hear Unchained Melody, I’ll tell them how much he loved that song. And one day, when I get my dad’s Bible, I’ll show them the leather Bible cover that he made and tooled by hand. I’ll show them the craftsmanship and the intricate designs that he chiseled into the leather with no pattern to follow. I’ll tell them how talented he was and how his dad taught him to tool saddles in west Texas.

They’ll know how much my dad loved Texas because of the Texas soil that I have in a little glass bottle
a little portion of the soil that each of us sprinkled onto my dad’s vault after he was lowered into the ground.

But mostly, I’ll tell them how much he loved each of them. And I’ll tell them how much I loved him.


How many persons are conceived via sperm donation in the U.S. annually? Nobody knows.

05.04.2012 2:53 PM

And in a new piece at BioNews, Wendy Kramer persuasively argues that what we don’t know should be the big story.

In 1988 the Office of Technology Assessment estimated that 30,000 children were born via donor insemination during the year 1986/87 in the US (1).

A quarter of a century – and no further research – later, ’30,000 annual births’ is still trotted out in academia, lectures and the media (2). Sometimes the number is doubled, probably to allow for the passage of time, and occasionally a range of 30,000 – 60,000 is deployed.

Yet so much about donor insemination has changed during this time. Using either of the whole figures is scientifically unjustifiable, and the range is just as flawed.

Hence, experts should not be using such patently erroneous figures. Rather, they should be noting that there is no reliable method of assessing how many children are conceived via donor insemination each year. They should be pointing out that the USA has no accurate tracking or record keeping from which it is possible to make an educated assessment.

Instead of complacently relying on outdated best guesstimate figures from more than a generation ago, they should be demanding reliable, recent figures. They should be voicing outrage that neither the fertility industry nor any other entity is required to collect data or report statistics on the numbers of human beings conceived using donor sperm. This is in stark contrast with cattle insemination, which is much more tightly regulated and surveyed. more

In our report, My Daddy’s Name is Donor, we also cited the 30-60,000 number as the experts’ best guesstimate. And believe me, if you try to tell a reporter that there really are no numbers the first reaction you get is that you must not know what you’re talking about. You can sense their fingers creeping along the figurative Rolodex to call their next source.

But Kramer is right. The big story should be that we don’t know the story.


Wouldn’t you love to be a writer for Law and Order?

05.04.2012 2:47 PM

This episode sounds fascinating. Though, sadly, it’s reminiscent of a true situation that happened recently in which some jerk contacted donor conceived persons telling them he was their father.

Detectives Benson (Mariska Hargitay) and Amaro (Danny Pino) investigate the disappearance of a teenaged girl after her young brother calls 9-1-1. While Fin (Ice-T) and Rollins (Kelli Giddish) look into a possible abduction, they discover the girl had been searching for her biological father, an anonymous sperm donor. The investigation takes a startling turn when a suspect is found to be targeting several young, vulnerable women, all with the same personal connection. But the suspect isn’t what he seems, and Dr. Huang (Wong) must delve into his past to save the women. Guest Starring Eric Close and James Van Der Beek. Also starring Richard Belzer (Sergeant John Munch.)


OK?

04.30.2012 11:55 AM

A new story posted at the Anonymous Us Project:

First they said we would be ok because at least we’d know who are mothers are.

Then they said we’d be ok so long as our parents tell us we were donor conceived.

Now they say we’ll be ok so long as our parents tell us we are donor conceived and we can access the identities of our biological donor parents.

When are they going to work it out that we’ll only be ok if they admit that donor conception is not ok?

We’ll be ok when society recognises the hypocrisy of recognising the importance of biological familial relationships and then saying they aren’t important if you’re donor conceived.

We’ll be ok when we are permitted to grieve that loss. To say it out loud. And have open ears receive the words without retribution.

Ok?


Just curious? Or more?

04.30.2012 11:52 AM

A question posted at Yahoo Answers:

I have two moms and am constantly wondering what it would be like to have a father and who my biological dad is. I’m wondering is there any way to find who he is?

Just curious? Or hurting badly?


Who gets the sperm?

04.30.2012 11:44 AM

A Canadian court in British Columbia has ordered a separating lesbian couple to divide 13 vials of sperm:

Assuming it is not possible, or that it is impractical, to divide one sperm straw in half, I award seven sperm straws to the claimant, J.C.M., and six sperm straws to the respondent, A.N.A.,” [Justice] Russell wrote.


‘Natural Selection’

04.23.2012 4:59 PM

The twist in “Natural Selection” comes when devout Christian housewife Linda  White, portrayed by Rachael Harris (“The Hangover”), discovers that her stricken spouse secretly fathered children as a sperm donor. She sets  off to locate his son, who turns out to be a charming escaped convict  (Matt O’Leary).


‘Huge rise in IVF for single and gay mothers since law requiring father figure was removed’

04.23.2012 4:55 PM

The UK’s Daily Mail:

In 2007, before the change in the law, only 350 single women had IVF. But by 2010, the last year for available figures, that had leapt 448 per cent to 1,571. The number of lesbian couples given IVF more than doubled in the same period, from 178 to 417. But the number of heterosexual couples treated rose by only 18 per cent. more

 


‘Single mothers can’t raise boys to be men’

04.06.2012 3:56 PM

That was the debate topic at the Black Spectrum Theatre:

…where a debate, hosted by Councilman James Sanders Jr. (D-Laurelton) as part of a salute to Women’s History Month, at times worked the audience of more than 100 vested individuals into a near frenzy of emotions.

The time restrictions were not always observed, the panelists didn’t necessarily speak in turn, and the audience was talking back long before the public participation segment began, but the debate did what Sanders said it set out to accomplish: it educated, motivated and sent the spectators home with plenty of food for thought.

“We might as well start wrestling with this in a respectful, disciplined manner,” Sanders said prior to the discussion.


How Being a Parent Makes You Think About Death

04.05.2012 4:58 PM

Just read a beautiful reflection on parenthood by writer Rachel Sherman.  I remember realizing after our oldest son was born that his pain and his death would crush me in ways that my pain and my death never will.

I would die a thousand deaths to keep my children from feeling theirs.

 


Best Interests of Children That Do Not Yet Exist

04.05.2012 3:34 AM

The below is actually the writing of Marilynn Huff, presented as a comment in Julie Shapiro’s blog. The question Shapiro offered was essentially, How can we do what is in the best interests of the child, when the child in question does not yet exist? And if that child is to be created via third-party reproduction, would it not be in the child’s best interest to exist rather than not exist?

Marilynn responds: 

I know which False Dilemma you’re using for this debate experiment – its False dilemma / False Choice (Hobson’s Choice) . The fallacy of the excluded middle, false dichotomy, false correlative, “either/or” fallacy and bifurcation involving a situation in which two alternative points of view are held to be the only options, when in reality there exists one or more other options which have not been considered. Hobson’s choice is “take it or leave it” take what is offered or get nothing.

So the Hobson’s choice you offer here is that abandonment by their biological fathers is essential to their existence. Had their biological fathers been required to support them the way people are made to support their children, those men never would have agreed to reproduce with our subject’s mothers and causing them never to be born lament their plight of genetic bewilderment. The false dilemma is that it seems we must allow some people to abandon their young in secret or millions of people will never have the chance to exist. Their fate rests on our shoulders unless we don’t think those people deserve to exist. Oh its so tricky!

The excluded middle of this false choice would be to focus our laws on how we treat individuals that are actually born. When those individuals are newly born someone has to be responsible for taking care of them or they’ll die. If a newborn is found in an alley starved and dead from exposure we would treat that neglect as a crime against the deceased infant. Who should the law hold accountable for that death? Who owed it to that child to try to keep him or her alive? Is the government the automatic parent of every person born who then picks and chooses parents based on the child’s best interests? That’s a pretty big burden for our government to take on. There would be an uproar if the government just randomly assigned people to care for infants they had nothing to do with creating. And while there are plenty of people who want to raise children they did not themselves create, there is not enough of them to handle the load if every newborn were unwanted. What would we do about the unwanted ones? Who should take care of them? What do they deserve? Who owes them the duty of providing physical and financial support if not the people who reproduced to create them then who? Another question is if people who have that responsibility should be able to sell their way out off the record before anyone knows its them that created the child.
.
The alternative to underwriting the abandonment of millions of future people would be to offer them the dignity of equal treatment upon their arrival. We could, treat all human beings as people who, as minor offspring, are entitled to the financial and physical support of the people who reproduced to create them, who, in turn will be responsible for the physical and financial support of their own minor offspring. We could as an alternative to off the record promises to abandon require on the record consent to relinquish just like people do when they give up children for adoption. That solution would not stop people from generously donating their offspring to people who want to raise them, they just could not do it all yellow bellied and cowardly like.

If being held responsible for the results of their reproductive behavior will make some people choose not to reproduce and give up their offspring, then so be it. There are millions of reasons why a person may decide not to reproduce at any given moment and we certainly don’t mourn the non-death of all the individuals that never existed because of it.
We cannot be so foolish as to believe that expecting individuals to behave responsibly toward their offspring will cost billions of people their lives because it will prevent them from ever being conceived. I’m sorry its just the biggest load of hooey anyone ever heard. Everything would be just dandy if all men were held to the same standard of care with regard to the support of their young.

Single women giving birth to half spring [donor-conceived offspring] really illustrate where it is that donor offspring have fewer rights because there is nobody fronting and making it look like they’ve lost nothing. Half spring are entitled to the support of their mother who qualifies as a person so she owes the kid her support. But donor offspring don’t have the same rights as full blooded people, remember they are half donor half person. Donors don’t owe their offspring anything – so it really shows what’s lost when single women do it. These rights are still lost when the woman is not single, it just seems like not such a big deal because they get supported by someone else so its almost the same. Of course its not because it means the person has to assume the false identity of being that person’s child.
No its not in the best interest of any person to be treated as less than human and less deserving of rights afforded to all other people. Its horribly distasteful to suggest their lives are dependent upon having been abandoned by one of the people that created them. Of course that’s not true and what an awful thing to imply. If I could personally go and pluck those words out of the air before they reached the ears of every person that’s ever been humiliated by being told that I would in a heartbeat.


US Supreme Court takes up posthumous conception

03.20.2012 2:25 PM

Lots of coverage yesterday and today. Here’s the WaPo as an example.

It seems to me the response here is pretty obvious. The children in question have the right to their deceased biological father’s benefits just like any other child does. If the state doesn’t like handing out state benefits to children conceived four years after their father’s death, then the state needs to take on the issue of posthumous conception which is currently perfectly legal in the US.


I’m a father, not a baby daddy

03.10.2012 3:14 PM

Scott Disick “hates” being called Kourtney Kardashian’s “baby daddy”. The 28-year-old businessman – who has two-year-old son Mason with the reality star and the couple are currently expecting a daughter – explained as the pair are not married, he would rather people referred to him as Mason’s father. Speaking on Khloe Kardashian’s radio show ‘Mix Up with Khloe Kardashian Odom’, he said: “I’d like to be referred to as the child’s father. I hate that term baby daddy!”

Yes, you’re the father. With baby number two on the way, maybe it’s time also to be your children’s mother’s husband.


Mass Incarceration Impacts the Future of Fatherhood

03.07.2012 10:13 AM

“I want to be the father my dad was not
I want to be there for my kids and talk about what matters.  I have to show up at their games and at school.  I want their memories to have my face in them
”

These are the words of a young father as he talked about his life after the death of his father a year ago.  He calls his father’s other three children the “outside” kids, but truthfully, his father never lived with him and his siblings so technically, he is an outside kid.  He frames his entire life story in terms of not having his father present as he grew up and how his greatest learning moment in life came when he realized that he had to stop blaming his poor choices in life on the choices his father made.  Becoming a father was, in part, a wake-up call.  But the call of “the streets” and making easy money in drugs was also and is also still there.  In and out of jail, then in prison for a year, he knew he had to do something differently if he was not going to be the absent father his father was.

I asked, “Who are your role models?  How do you know how to be a good dad?”

He paused for a long time.  Staring at the floor, furrowed brow, twisting lisps to the right and left, “hmmm
maybe
Abraham.”

Thinking that this must be a neighbor, friend, or relative I asked, “And where is he?”

“The Bible,” he replied.

I nodded my head and smiled in understanding, but in my mind I was thinking, ‘WHAT?!?!  Your day to day role model for being a dad is a nomadic prophet who lived 4000 years ago, who abandoned one wife and son, pretended that his wife was not his wife at least twice, and almost killed his son for his faith.  How could any of that possibly relate to carpool and basketball games let alone the modern world?

My heart sunk as I realized that for countless young, African American men there are far more familiar faces in jail and the narrative of drug dealing and imprisonment is far to easy to replicate.  I have not yet read Michelle Alexander’s book, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, but I soon will.  Today’s NYTimes recaps her journey in writing the book as well as the responses to it.  Read more here


It sounds as though her book focuses on the race implications of mass incarceration but I would be willing to say it goes beyond race to gender.  There is an entire generation of fathers who desperately need our support.  Everybody needs a role model to emulate, and I don’t want Abraham to be the most accessible man to emulate as a father.


‘Sunday-in-the-park fun of being a father, with none of the drudgery’

03.03.2012 5:09 PM

At the lad mag Details, a new story:

Imagine all the Sunday-in-the-park fun of being a father with none of the drudgery. That’s what’s leading more and more guys to donate sperm to friends and then play the occasional parent.


‘Baby Daddy’

03.02.2012 12:11 PM

A new TV show airing this spring.

Ben who, in his 20s, becomes a surprise dad to a baby girl when she’s left on his doorstep by an ex-girlfriend. Ben decides to raise the baby with the help of his mother, his brother, his best buddy and his close female friend, who is harboring a secret crush on him.

How odd that when we have a national crisis of men in their 20s walking away from their children, a new TV show would feature a fictional father willing to raise his child whose mother walked away.