Archives: Childhood

‘Children with same-sex parents are the focus of a new Australian study’

05.15.2012 10:15 AM

The Australian Study of Child Health in Same-Sex Families aims to investigate the physical, mental and social wellbeing of 750 children belonging to about 500 parents. It will involve surveys and interviews to score the children on a large range of measures.

Lead researcher from Melbourne University, Dr Simon Crouch, said although there were likely to be thousands of children with same-sex attracted parents in Australia, very few local studies had ever looked at whether their family circumstances affected their wellbeing and when they had, they were small. Furthermore, he said most studies of such children had been done in northern European countries and the US and they tended to focus on children of lesbian mothers at the expense of those belonging to gay men, bisexuals and transgender people.

They’re asking people to volunteer for the study.


More than just Teething Troubles

05.09.2012 9:50 PM

We tend to think of romantic relationships as between two individuals. But when they fall apart, it becomes obvious that there is no such thing as two lone lovers. Families, children, friends are all implicated in the breakup.

Today on my way to the grocery store I talked on the phone with Megan, a 24 year old woman that I interviewed in Ohio and who has since become a friend. She and her fiancé, Troy, recently broke up. He told her—the day after they had just finished paying off her wedding dress—that he just wasn’t happy in the relationship anymore.

She’s since posted on Facebook a photo of her, him, and her newborn daughter (they started dating when she was eight months pregnant) at the hospital with this caption: “I’m missing this so much! I hope he comes back!”

Veronica, Megan’s one year old, hopes Troy comes back, too. Although he’s not her biological father, he was the first person to hold her after Megan’s c-section, and he spoke to her while she was in the womb. Megan tells me that Veronica, who is just starting to talk, has been saying “da-da” often and asking for him.

Veronica also has been asking for “pawpaw,” Troy’s dad. Troy’s parents tell Megan that they still want to be nana and pawpaw to Veronica—and Troy’s dad’s Facebook is still plastered with photos of his “granddaughter”—but one can imagine the complications, especially considering that Troy still lives with them. In fact, Troy’s mom is stopping by tomorrow to give Megan back the baby items that they kept for Veronica at their home.

On top of all this, Veronica is teething, and so she hasn’t been feeling well or sleeping well. Megan notes, sadly, that Veronica hasn’t been acting herself. She thinks that it’s more than just the teething—she thinks she’s been missing the man she knows as “da-da.”


Las Vegas Review-Journal: ‘A New Child Welfare Campaign’

04.16.2012 8:53 PM

Reported by columnist Glenn Cook:

…The maddening, tragic trend of children being murdered by the abusive boyfriends of their single mothers has the full attention of valley law enforcement, social workers and researchers. On Wednesday, as part of National Child Abuse Prevention Month, a coalition led by UNLV’s Nevada Institute for Children’s Research and Policy launched the “Choose Your Partner Carefully” campaign. The drive, which already is under way in other communities across the country, attempts to educate parents about qualities in a partner/caregiver that officials say can put a child at risk for abuse.

The state-funded campaign will place posters at bus stop shelters and fliers and brochures at community centers, medical offices, schools, child care providers, domestic violence shelters and government offices.

This is a great idea.

And better than another recent idea out of Wisconsin. See my earlier blog post to learn about the research on risks to children of living with their mother’s boyfriends.


‘What is it with you Americans?’

04.01.2012 10:52 AM

…was the question put to me by Elise, my friendly boss during an internship at a women’s rights organization in Manila, the Philippines a couple decades ago. “You all turn 18 and move across the country from your parents.” Elise herself, having married and then divorced a Spaniard, was happily living at her parents’ home in Manila along with her two young children who had ample caregivers in their grandmother and the abundant, cheap hired help that is standard for middle-class families in developing countries, leaving Elise free to campaign full-time for women’s rights. Meanwhile, I had flown the family coop as far as possible, from North Carolina to various parts of Asia, then eventually Seattle, then Chicago. Reared in the land of “westward ho,” a nation renowned for the geographic mobility of its citizens, I was just doing what seemed normal.

As I get older, though, I wonder why we all move around so much and I notice resistance to that trend. “Aging in place.” “Staycation.” “Boomerang children,” the latter being a derisive term for grown children who, shock and horror, live with their folks (in Italy they call it “mamoni“). Recently the New York Times published a piece by Todd G. Buchholz and Victoria Buchholz in which they noted, “The likelihood of 20-somethings moving to another state has dropped well over 40 percent since the 1980s, according to calculations based on Census Bureau data.” They labeled today’s young people “The Go-Nowhere Generation.”

But is staying put so bad? What is it with us Americans?


Did You Celebrate Hoodie Sunday?

03.27.2012 11:51 AM

My piece at HuffPost today was inspired by my thoughts on empathy from this last weekend…


A Culture of Narcissism and Its Impact on Empathic Caregiving

03.25.2012 3:25 PM

W. was an 18-year-old high school graduate the summer he volunteered 40 hours a week with our hospice program.  I had forgotten about W. until he came back to the office for a visit, now a college graduate, and thanked me for offering him a summer that changed his life.  I thought of him as I read Dr. Pinsky’s (Dr. Drew) and Dr. S. Mark Young’s book The Mirror Effect: How Celebrity Narcissism is Seducing America this weekend.

When W. first came that summer I was a bit perplexed as to how to fill up 40 hours a week of volunteer work.  At first it sounds great, but imagine an 18-year-old boy shadowing you at your job for three months: the depths of just how boring your life really is becomes painfully apparent very quickly.  He hosted the weekly grief support group (he was a hit with the older ladies) and attended team and was trained to make visits to our patients residing in a nursing home.  For a while he visited Ms. F. several times a week.  She was, as our team would say, “not fully oriented to space and time.”  However, she could carry on a conversation with you, it would just entail people and things that were not necessarily visible to you.  She didn’t always trust people so W. was up for a challenge.  The nursing aides taught him how to assist her at meals so he would visit her and keep her company at lunchtime.

For a small window of time Ms. F. had a bicycle, only visible to her.  W. came one day to take her to lunch and she was very worried about leaving her bike unattended.  Someone might steal it.  W. was feeling a little impatient since lunch runs on a tight schedule so he quickly assured her that it would be just fine parked in her room.

They returned from lunch a little while later and sure enough, the bike was gone.  Ms. F. began to scream and cry, distraught that someone had taken her bike.  “Someone stole my bike!!!  Where is my bike!?!?”  W. felt terrible and at first panicked.  He had never heard Ms. F. so upset and they were starting to attract attention.  He thought, “I’m just going to leave and call Amy and have her come fix it.”  But he realized that this solution would take too long and he needed to do something.  He followed the first rule of all improvisational theater: say yes.  He went with it.

“Wait, Ms. F., I saw your bike.  I know where it is.  Let me go get it,” W. said calmly.

Ms. F. quieted and stared at amazement at W. as he walked down the hall, pretended to get a bike leaning against the wall, mount it, ride down the hall to her room, dismount and roll the bike into her room.

“Here it is!” he smiled.

W. says that the smile on her face just beamed in deep relief as she said, “thank you!”

W. admitted to me as he recounted this story, “I never thought I could feel so good returning someone’s imaginary bike.”

During that summer, W. broke his leg so he spent at least a month of his time with us on crutches with a brightly colored cast on his leg.  I was 14 months pregnant (gave birth August 19th) so we made quite the pair.  Around the first week of August we organized a group of teenagers to come to Mr. John’s house to clear brush.  Mr. John’s mother was a hospice patient, he the caregiver, and over that summer Mr. John became our patient as well.  One of his last wishes was to clear a back acre of land so that he land would be clear for his nephew to sell after his death.  This story includes teenagers with machetes and a busted a gas line, but the part I remember best was the point when Mr. John joined W. and I to shoot the breeze since none of us were fit to wield a machete.  He wobbled up to us with his walker and said, “Hey, we’d make a great joke: a pregnant lady, a cripple, and a dying man walk into a bar…”  As we drove back to the office that day, W. commented, “I had no idea dying people would be just like me.”

Towards the end of that summer, W. came into my office after a hospice team meeting, sat down across from me and plopped the team sheet down on the desk—the team sheet lists all the patients we are currently serving.  He said, “When I start college this fall, most of these people will be dead.”

I sat silently with him waiting to see where he would go with this true and heavy observation. He spoke with quiet confidence, “I gotta pull it together…”

I smiled and started laughing.

He replied in shock, “What!?”

I said, “Duh.”

Reading Dr. Drew’s recent study on celebrity narcissism and its unintended effects on society as a whole, I kept bumping up against the word EMPATHY.  He stresses that a key element to narcissistic behavior is “chronic empathic failure.” (97)  He defines empathy as:

“the ability or willingness to recognize, perceive, and relate to the emotions of another person, to experience the world from another’s point of view…empathy develops over time, reinforced constantly by positive experiences of emotional attunement with others…” (103-4)

In a world of pseudo selves on Facebook, My Space, Twitter and the opportunities of “reality” TV or YouTube to make individuals famous for being famous, he opines that “this generation may have a harder time forming relationships.  They may favor self-promotion over helping others.  And their attitudes, beliefs and constant need for attention may make them difficult, if not impossible, to be around.” (201)

This reality has huge implications, all seemingly negative, as we will soon face an age where our need for empathic and self-sacrificing elder caregivers will be unprecedented.  Today’s USA Today calls for cities and states to get ready for a time when 1 in 5 Americans will be over 60.  But a huge part of getting ready to be a nation of caregivers will entail being honest with ourselves about our common narcissistic tendencies.

As any good self-help guru, Dr. Drew does offer some suggestions of techniques to use in controlling our narcissistic tendencies and in overcoming baser impulses like envy or aggression in our responses to others.

1)      Strive to increase self-insight and embrace the concept of something greater.

2)      Practice rigorous honesty.

3)      Keep things simple and live up to commitments.

4)      Spend time with a broad range of people.

5)      Share your feelings.

6)      Learn to appreciate the feelings of others.

7)      Be of service. (240-7)

And so I come back to W.  Dr. Drew writes at length of how teenagers are naturally narcissistic due to their age and stage of brain development.  They learn to mirror the behavior and attitudes of those around them, be those of celebrities or those of real people who are genuinely engaging with the world, surrounding themselves with a wide range of people, learning to empathize, and being of service.

To be the nation of caregivers our elders will soon demand, we will need to collectively put our narcissism in check.


How to Support Grieving Children

03.15.2012 11:12 AM

The first national poll of grieving children was released this week:

“The New York Life Foundation /NAGC poll of 531 kids age 18 and under who have lost a parent or sibling was conducted in-person at bereavement centers nationwide between November 21, 2011 and January 5, 2012. It is believed to be the first public opinion poll of grieving children…

–75% of bereaved kids say they are currently sad

–41% have reacted to their loss in harmful ways — physically, emotionally or mentally

–Many worry about losing surviving parent or guardian

–Support from Individuals, Schools Often Falls Short:

–Kids value communication about loss, but feel it’s lacking: Many say “most people don’t know how to talk to you after a loved one dies”

–Half of kids give school no better than “C” grade at helping them cope

–Kids Strive to Be Resilient But Need Understanding and Support:

–Two-thirds still continue to “enjoy life,” most say the future will “hopefully still be good”

–Many find it helpful to talk to others who have experienced grief” Read more…

The report reminds me again that not only do adults tend to have a difficult time processing their grief, but children do as well, and adults struggle with knowing how to talk with or listen to children who have experienced death or loss.  One of my favorite books to use with children is by the author of the popular Arthur series, Marc Brown.  When Dinosaurs Die: A Guide to Understanding Death is a good place to start.  I also have used several different coloring books or workbooks, but there are many out there that are good.  Most of the time, they help the adult working through them with their child as much as they help the child.  Although compiled in 2004, here is a link to several pages of resources for children and teens, should you ever need them.


Should a state in its laws note the risks to children of fragmented families?

03.09.2012 12:16 PM

Wisconsin state senator Glenn Grothman has proposed SB 507 which seeks to require the state’s Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention Board “to emphasize nonmarital parenthood as a contributing factor to child abuse and neglect” in state materials and education and public awareness campaigns. (The bill is here.) The bill was the subject of public debate on Wednesday of this week and has been the subject of a lot of largely aghast news coverage in Wisconsin and around the nation. The bill is said to be stigmatizing and blaming single mothers for child abuse.

Most of the commentators seem utterly ignorant of large bodies of data showing the dramatic risks to children of living with a single parent (often because such situations bring unrelated men into the home), much of it funded by or reported by the federal government as well as by professors at major research universities.

The source for the table below is from a recent major US Department of Health and Human Services report, analyzing federal data. Study it carefully for a moment.

Or read the Pediatrics article “Child Deaths Resulting From Inflicted Injuries: Household Risk Factors and Perpetrator Characteristics,” by Patricia G. Schnitzer and Bernard G. Ewigman:
Or read “Mothers, Men, and Child Protective Services Involvement,” by Lawrence M. Berger, Christina Paxson, and Jane Waldfogel, resulting from the National Institutes of Health funded Fragile Families study based at Princeton University:
Or read a 2008 research brief we published, authored by W. Bradford Wilcox and Jeffrey Dew, “Protectors or Perpetrators? Fathers, Mothers, and Child Abuse and Neglect.”
Or read Robin Fretwell Wilson’s Cornell Law Review article, “Children at Risk: The Sexual Exploitation of Female Children after Divorce”:
These studies of fractured families differ in their estimates of the percentage of girls molested during childhood. However, regardless of whether the precise number is 50% or even half that, the rate is staggering and suggests that girls are at much greater risk after divorce than we might have imagined.
Professor Wilson continues:
Despite these studies, the idea that so many girls in fractured families report childhood sexual abuse strains credulity. Nevertheless, with more than seventy social science studies confirming the link between divorce and molestation, there is little doubt that the risk is indeed real. As difficult as it is to accept, a girl’s sexual vulnerability skyrockets after divorce, with no indication that this risk will subside.
So, FamilyScholars readers, what do you think? Should a state in its laws note the risks to children of living in fragmented families?

No Place for Kids

02.17.2012 1:52 PM

…No Place for Kids: The Case for Reducing Juvenile Incarceration, published by the Annie E. Casey Foundation, reveals the horrifying conditions of such facilities. It cites research from 2010 showing that one in eight confined youths reported being sexually abused by staff or other incarcerated young people, while 42 percent feared physical attack.

Grace Bauer is now a full-time activist dedicated to juvenile justice reform. She is the co-director of Justice for Families.

”I’m always cautious about declaring victory because in this country there are 2.1 million arrests of juveniles every year. On any given night 100,000 kids could be in a facility very similar to what Corey endured,” Grace said.


‘Helping children of jailed parents’

02.17.2012 1:48 PM

An opinion piece in today’s Philadelphia Inquirer by Kathleen Creamer and Ann Schwartzman:

On any given day, at least 100,000 children in Pennsylvania have a parent in prison or jail. With the recent release of a joint legislative commission’s report on the issue, the commonwealth has begun the important work of taking a serious look at the lives of these children…

Too often in Pennsylvania, children are unable to maintain such contact with parents. A child may have to travel a great distance to see an incarcerated parent, making visitation infrequent or impossible. Many jails and prisons require that children be separated from parents by a glass divider regardless of the nature of the parent’s crime. Even phone calls can be fraught with logistic and financial obstacles.

The committee’s report contains specific recommendations for addressing these and other challenges faced by children of incarcerated parents. They include: child-friendly visiting conditions at correctional facilities, as well as video conferencing and e-mail to supplement visits; a statewide arrest protocol to reduce the trauma children experience when they witness a parent’s arrest; increased therapeutic and community support for children of incarcerated parents and those caring for them; greater flexibility for caseworkers in determining whether termination of parental rights is appropriate for a child in foster care; and improved training for and collaboration between corrections and child-welfare officials…


Children in Prison

02.13.2012 1:42 PM

In America today, children can be born in prison, incarcerated with their mothers*, or incarcerated themselves.

Yet most headlines about our prison system seem to be about cash-strapped states trying to figure out how to privatize prisons or reduce numbers of inmates to save money.

Doesn’t this all seem…strange?

 

*update: I mistakenly used an article from an African newspaper here, see comments for discussion


Parentless Parents

02.06.2012 1:21 PM

I recently checked out a fairly new book by Allison Gilbert titled, Parentless Parents: How the Loss of our Mothers and Fathers Impacts the Way we Raise our Children.  I immediately thought of a dear friend of mine who once explained to me how after both her parents died she rues her birthday.  Each year, she is reminded that of the three people directly involved in and present on the day she came into the world, only she remains.  It was somehow comforting to her to know that there were other people in the world for whom remembering her birthday was not optional.  But now, everyone who remembers her birthday is ancillary and does so by choice not by direct association.

I picked up the book because although both my parents are living, I am married to someone whose father has died.  Over the years, I have grieved and struggled with the awareness that I don’t know what he goes through or how the death of a parent impacts all that you are and all that you will be.  The author, Gilbert, not only has experienced the death of both her parents but also has researched through quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews the experiences of parentless parents, and through both her story and the stories of others she seeks to create community as well as offer ideas for how to survive and thrive despite loss.  Read More


‘No Loving Parent’ Will Be ‘Pushed Out’

02.06.2012 1:01 PM

And grandparents count too…one parent or five? plus grandparents?

For kids from divided and multiple homes, all this separate visiting will hardly leave them any time for school.

From the UK:

Ken Clarke, the justice secretary, has published proposals to give divorced and separated fathers stronger rights to see their children, as part of an overhaul of the family justice system.

Grandparents are also expected to get greater influence, amid plans to look into how “parenting agreements” could emphasise the need for parents to consider children’s continuing relationship with other close family members.

Other reforms include a six-month time limit for care and adoption cases in the courts, although Clarke insisted that flexibility would remain to ensure a time extension for complex cases where this was in the children’s interest.

The key change in the process is the introduction of rules making clearer that it is vital youngsters enjoy “an ongoing relationship with both parents”. Ministers have signalled that they will not offer the guarantee of equal access demanded by some fathers’ rights groups but want to ensure no loving parent is “pushed out”.


WaPo: ‘In D.C. schools, early lessons in gay tolerance’

02.06.2012 11:18 AM

In the national push to prevent bullying, more elementary schools are introducing lessons about gay tolerance. Some lessons begin before the first day of kindergarten.

One fall day at Oyster-Adams Bilingual School in Northwest Washington, Scarlette Garnier and her pre-kindergarten classmates drew pictures of their families and talked about their similarities and differences.

They found that some children live with grandparents, some have a mommy and a daddy, and some, like 5-year-old Scarlette, have two mommies.Teacher Melissa Grant said she doesn’t put any weight or value on one family structure over another. At this age, she said, children are very accepting. “They just kind of find it interesting,” she said.

Much more, including a school that has ditched Mother’s Day for Family Day, so as to be fair to gay and single dads.

While they’re at it, I wonder if the schools would like to put into place counseling and sensitivity training programs for any students who might — just might — be grieving the absence of their mother or father in their daily lives? (Oh wait, something like that might make the parents bringing the kids to school feel bad. Scratch that.)


The multitude of family structures for persons raised by gay and lesbian parents: A challenge for researchers

01.25.2012 5:43 PM

Studying persons raised by gay or lesbian parents is such a challenge. There are not so many gay and lesbian persons to begin with, the sexual identity of the parents can be fluid, children raised by persons who have identified as gay or lesbian may have started life with parents who identified as heterosexual, and even in an intact gay or lesbian relationship the children will always have come, at least in part, from somewhere else: via adoption, reproductive technologies, or a previous heterosexual encounter, relationship, or marriage.

Which means finding, naming, and making sense of the experience of these young people is and will remain an enormous challenge, given that father or mother loss is inevitably a part of their story, with such losses happening through distinctive and sometimes multiple channels that may be having independent effects on children (adoption, donor conception, single parent childbearing, divorce) and oftentimes more than one of these experiences happening over time in the life of one child.

A recent paper in the Journal of Marriage and Family, “Marriage (In)equality: The Perspectives of Adolescents and Emerging Adults With Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Parents,” by Abbie E. Goldberg and Katherine A. Kuvalanka, illustrates the variety of experiences found in even a small sample of youth raised by a gay or lesbian parent:

Participants grew up in a variety of family situations. In 20 cases, participants had been born to two mothers via donor insemination and had a biological mother and a nonbiological mother. In 22 cases, participants had been born to heterosexual parents, one or both of whom later came out as LGB (in 13 cases, their mother; in eight cases, their father; in one case, both parents). Two participants were born to a single lesbian mother, one was born to a lesbian couple and a gay male couple who coparented, one was born to a bisexual mother and a gay father, one was adopted by two gay fathers at birth, one was adopted by two lesbian mothers at birth, and one was born to heterosexual parents but later adopted by a lesbian couple via the child welfare system.


How Will the Death of Disney Moms Shape our Grief?

01.24.2012 12:18 PM

Today’s Obit.com re-posts a piece by David Jays on Disney movies and death, and aptly points out how mothers are most likely missing in Disney movies.  Does Ariel have a mom? Does Belle have a mom?  Does Jasmine have a mom?  Pinnochio has no mom.  Cinderella’s mom is dead and replaced by an evil Stepmother who competes with her.  Snow White’s mom is dead and replaced by an evil Stepmother who competes with her. In Tangled, Rapunzel is kidnapped by an evil, faux mother who uses her magic hair to stay eternally young. Sleeping Beauty has a mom, but she also doesn’t really have a name (can you think of it? It’s Aurora…) and she is in a coma. And of course, Bambi’s mom dies:

“Disney’s films are undeniably weird about mothers. Dumbo’s mother is locked up, Pinocchio lacks one entirely, while the maternal instinct curdles in stories drawn from fairy tales. Snow White’s villainous stepmother is both icy beauty and cackling hag, intent on murder. Bambi, however, is full of anodyne mothers – a herd of Stepford beasts contentedly putters along with their cubs and chicks (where are all the fathers? Do they commute to hunt and gather?). But the maternal bond truly interests Disney only when under threat. The little deer’s mother is less a character than an enveloping maternal instinct – a vague presence but an awesome, aching absence.

The studio was already preparing Bambi when Flora Disney died from carbon monoxide poisoning in 1938. According to biographer Neal Garber, “it may have been the most shattering moment of Walt Disney’s life … he was inconsolable.” He refused to discuss the death, but instructed the artists creating Pinocchio to delete all references to the wife of woodcarver Geppetto, making him a bachelor. Bambi’s trauma may have been Disney’s own.”

Granted, now a days kids are inundated with all sorts of movies and TV but for my generation Disney and Charlie Brown (no parents!) were it.  The very words “limited release” and “Disney vault” still spark anxiety in me.  Makes me wonder how Disney depictions of mother and death will shape our future caregiving and grieving practices.  Will we be looking for escape a la coma, dwarfs, balls, and beasts?  Will we be alone?  I am always struck by how despite being reunited with family and future spouse, the Disney Princesses are always depicted alone, staring off into space.  No one shares their reality, not even what they are looking at!


Casino Prep Schools

01.24.2012 11:15 AM

Dr. Lloyd Sederer, Medical Director for the New York State Office of Mental Health, coins this phrase: Casino Prep Schools, as he describes the evolution of arcades to casino-like fantasy worlds.  He writes:

In casinos for kids, in addition to the games there are drinks and food everywhere you turn: high-sugar and high-fat foods, including huge glasses of sugary beverages, nachos and potato skins in which cheese and bacon swim, sour cream like it was running water, and chicken and buffalo wings as plentiful as kudzu. These foods fuel the brain and body for the high intensity, electronic world of video games (and the few retro toss-the-ball games embedded among the digital delights). These are foods that antecede (and later accompany) the nicotine and alcohol that youth will graduate to further stimulate the reward centers of the brain.

There is also the paper gaming tickets of varying values in casinos for kids. Youth and adult players buy these at a gazebo located at the very center of the well of machines so there is never far to walk to convert paper money for valueless paper that lets you play. The tickets are paper versions of gambling chips, of course. There is a store at the rear where wads of tickets can be exchanged for stuffed toys of every color in the rainbow. The machines are programmed to let some win, some of the time, just like in any casino. But make no mistake: The house always wins.

As a mother who avoids Chuck E. Cheese or other such “pizza” and arcade destinations/Dante’s 7th ring of hell like the plague, I find myself agreeing with Dr. Sederer.  Any place that requires your children to be stamped with a matching, infrared stamp as their parents so that other adults do not steal your children under the guise of total chaos, is not somewhere I want to be.  And yet, my kids would sell their right arms to go.

Makes me wonder, whatever happened to Skee Ball?


Interesting Conversations at WashPo Today

01.09.2012 9:44 AM

A couple of interesting live question and answer forums are happening at WashPost today in their Conversations section.

The first, at 11am EST, is with Page Melton Ivie, the woman and family I opined about on Monday.  The topic:

“Page Melton Ivie’s ill husband would never be the same. She fell in love with another man. How could they find happiness, yet honor a sacred vow?

Join Page Melton Ivie and Susan Baer for a live chat on Monday, January 9 at 11 a.m. Ask your question now.”

I was surprised that no one was more up in arms over my suggestion of trying out polygamy…If you don’t have time to ask a question, at least check out the photo gallery.  There is one picture where she is sandwiched between the two men, holding their hands.  The new husband looks at the camera and she looks up at her first husband.  It’s makes me pause.

I will be interested to see what they say about vows.  I, personally, don’t think that you need to be religious to believe that vows or promises are important to civil society.  How do we support or challenge people who feel that they need to break a vow, regardless of heartbreaking the story?

The next conversation at noon also looks very interesting for parents…Topic:

“What do you do when your 7 year old begins parroting offensive hip-hop lyrics? What about when their favorite hip-hop radio station regularly runs ads for the local strip joint? Ask Abdul Ali and Natalie Hopkinson. They both recently wrote articles touching on how hip-hop has presented challenges in their parenting recently, and it affects the black community.

Join Abdul and Natalie as they discuss conflicts as parents as it relates to not only hip hop, but also the lower standards in how hip hop and other black pop is broadcast.”

 


Incarceration Generation

01.04.2012 4:13 PM

Many months ago I recorded an episode of “Our America” hosted by Lisa Ling titled “Incarceration Generation,” and I finally found time to watch it yesterday.  Following the lives of two incarcerated young men in Georgia, Nick and Royal, Ling focuses on the past and future families of these two men, wondering how their families of origin shaped their path to prison and how their imprisonment shapes the lives of their current and future families.

Ling covers much statistical and economic common ground that continues to startle. She begins with depressing statistics like “African-American men make up 6% of the total American population but 1/3 of the incarcerated.”  She reminded me of the Pew Charitable Trust funded report “1 in 100: Behind Bars in America 2008.”

“Three decades of growth in America’s prison population has quietly nudged the nation across a sobering threshold: for the first time, more than one in every 100 adults is now confined in an American jail or prison. According to figures gathered and analyzed by the Pew Public Safety Performance Project, the number of people behind bars in the United States continued to climb in 2007, saddling cash-strapped states with soaring costs they can ill afford and failing to have a clear impact either on recidivism or overall crime.

For some groups, the incarceration numbers are especially startling. While one in 30 men between the ages of 20 and 34 is behind bars, for black males in that age group the figure is one in nine. Gender adds another dimension to the picture. Men still are roughly 10 times more likely to be in jail or prison, but the female population is burgeoning at a far brisker pace. For black women in their mid- to late-30s, the incarceration rate also has hit the 1-in-100 mark. Growing older, meanwhile, continues to have a dramatic chilling effect on criminal behavior. While one in every 53 people in their 20s is behind bars, the rate for those over 55 falls to one in 837.”

Each man faced difficulties economically growing up, which in part spurred their involvement in crime. But prison has devastating effects on their hope of changing their economic outlook legally after prison as well.  She follows each man as they try to figure out how to get a job when every job application asks if you’ve ever been convicted of a felony.  As Royal’s stepfather says, “Once you’ve done time on the inside, you face a life sentence on the outside…No one will have you.”

Although the stats and the economic roots and impact of prison are humbling and eye-opening, I was struck by how the title “Incarceration Generation” could easily have been changed to “Fathers Matter and Prison is Terrible for Fatherhood.”  Ling spends a good deal of time with Nick’s girlfriend and two young sons who anticipate his release from prison soon.  One of his sons has not yet met him.   Ling asks the girlfriend what she wants when he gets home:

“I want a 2 parent, 2 income household.  If he can’t give me that, then I’m gone.”

But she is worried about male role models.  Every male in her life (dad, brother and boyfriend) is in prison.  What chance do her young sons have?  Nick seems pretty hopeless as well: he has a 9th grade education, admits he doesn’t know how to use a computer, and with being in and out of prison for the last 8 years, has no job experience.

Royal, on the other hand, is spending his days at the public library taking computer classes and filling out resumes.  His family of origin is supportive, especially his stepfather, Carl, who as an ex-convict started a non-profit organization that supports previous prisoners.  They highlight a program he leads in a Georgia school that offers training to teen dads on parenting skills.  They film him in a full cafeteria of teen boys who are already fathers.  He asks how many of them grew up with their dads.  Two raise their hands.  “Two,” he says, “Boys can make babies, but it takes a man to raise one.  Who wants to be a man?”

Overall, the negative impact of incarceration on the individual, the family, and the community as a whole is staggering, and Ling covers just a part of Georgia and she stops at description.  As I turned off the television, I realized again that description only goes so far and that it’s up to us to highlight the prescriptions that are working and to start thinking and trying more.


Middle Childhood

12.29.2011 12:02 PM

All of you who, like me, have children in “middle childhood” might be as fascinated as I was by Natalie Angier’s piece this week in the NYT summarizing recent research on this distinctive period of life:

…Said to begin around 5 or 6, when toddlerhood has ended and even the most protractedly breast-fed children have been weaned, and to end when the teen years commence, middle childhood certainly lacks the physical flamboyance of the epochs fore and aft: no gotcha cuteness of babydom, no secondary sexual billboards of pubescence.

Yet as new findings from neuroscience, evolutionary biology, paleontology and anthropology make clear, middle childhood is anything but a bland placeholder. To the contrary, it is a time of great cognitive creativity and ambition, when the brain has pretty much reached its adult size and can focus on threading together its private intranet service — on forging, organizing, amplifying and annotating the tens of billions of synaptic connections that allow brain cells and brain domains to communicate…