Saturday, March 22, 2003
 
FROM MELBOURNE, an exhibition entitled Under the Covers - Love, Sex and Intimacy in Jewish Life, at the Jewish Museum, St Kilda:
Mark Baker, Melbourne University lecturer in Jewish history, says Judaism's "this world" view of sex contrasts sharply with Christianity's discomfort with earthly desires. "It (sex) was something that needed to be restrained and made holy through various types of behaviour. The body itself was never seen as tainted."



Friday, March 21, 2003
 
FROM THE SEATTLE TIMES: Review of Randall Kennedy's book, "Interracial Intimacies: Sex, Marriage, Identity and Adoption"


 
Oh, to be a sophisticated single in New York.
The latest fad to hit New York City's singles scene is "Dinner in the Dark."

Imagine a gourmet four-course meal with champagne and fine wine -- served and eaten entirely in darkness. Only the waiters, wearing night-vision goggles, can see what's going on.

Promoters promise the dinner is intimate and people lose their inhibitions in the pitch black, making it a great way to meet people.
...
Whether anyone would want to meet these people, who acted more like high school students during a cafeteria power blackout than like urbane urbanites, is a whole different story.
...
"It was great. You got to grope strangers, like that blond woman right there," a 36-year-old business manager named Jeff said gleefully. He also admitted to tossing pieces of bread at other diners under the protection of darkness.
...
"We were just copping feels under the table. I felt like I was in kindergarten," said Sabreena, a 33-year-old attorney, standing amid broken glass in the littered dining room after the meal.

Just what kind of kindergarten did she go to?


 
"NORMAL ONE-PARENT FAMILIES": I'm not sure, either, what she meant by this remarkable phrase. But in today's "normal" one-parent homes: the breakup involves the conscious decision to leave by at least one of the parents; there is no heroic or self-sacrificial aspect to it; and the parent who leaves is not planning to return. In the case of this military family, the decision to leave was made not by the parents but by the military; there is a heroic dimension to the leaving; and the parent who leaves hopes and plans to return. We had a lot of one-parent homes in 1940-45 in the U.S., too, but what was "normal" about them is pretty much the opposite of what is normal today.


 
"THE COMMODIFICATION OF EVERYTHING": A very interesting-looking symposium at the University of Virginia, with lots of connections to children's and family issues. If anyone is doing better work these days on U.S. culture that James Davison Hunter and his colleagues at UVA -- it seems that, among other things, they start a new publication or center every month or so -- I'm not aware of them.


 
WHEN DADDY�S ON THE FRONT LINE, part II � In the touching BBC article posted by David Blankenhorn, below, the author explains her children�s fears in the wake of their father departing for war in Iraq. She and other mothers on the base are trying to organize and support each other in order to address their children�s grief. But she notes:

�it's not been easy - a lot of groups have shied away from helping us because we're not normal one-parent families with the usual problems.

I�m not entirely sure what she means by this, but it sounds as though this author, a married mother, is finding that resources are increasingly directed toward �normal one-parent families� (what a provocative phrase!) rather than toward married, two-parent families like her own. There is a fine line between policies that address the effects of family breakdown and those that normalize broken families (and overlook married, two-parent families.) Is she experiencing the consequences of that line being drawn incorrectly?



 
FATHERLESS BHUTAN?:
Zhemgang dzongkhag has a problem. It has a small population of illegitimate children who cannot trace their fathers.





Thursday, March 20, 2003




 
FROM BRITAIN:
There were 249,227 marriages in England and Wales in 2001, the lowest since 1897, the Office for National Statistics said yesterday. With more couples choosing to live together without marrying, the trend has been downward since 1972, when the figure reached a peak of 426,241. The latest total would have been lower had it not included people marrying for the second time or more. About four in 10 marriages included at least one partner who had been married before. A fifth involved couples who had both been married. The average age of a man getting married was 34.8 years and 32.2 for a woman.



 
WHO WINS, THE BABY OR THE BOSS? This just in from Melbourne:
A pharmaceutical company will give employees returning from parental leave up to $6000 for child care in a policy that breaks new ground for Australian family-friendly workplaces. Aventis has introduced the deal in an attempt to retain its female staff, after it found that about half of the women who went on maternity leave did not return. The plan includes eight weeks' paid leave for primary caregivers and one week for secondary caregivers. The child-care payment of up to $1000 a month for six months after the primary caregiver returns to work sets Aventis apart from other companies with maternity leave schemes. Managing director Colin Hannah said Aventis did not want to lose talented women when they started their families.
"Family friendly"? I'm sure that the folks at Aventis have already started running victory laps and getting awards for this new "family friendly" program, but to me it sounds like a pretty crass, hard-headed strategy -- $6,000 cash on the barrel! -- for pursuading female employees who haven't been returning to work, to return to work right away. Whether that is "family friendly" or not depends on where you sit. Is it "family friendly" from the baby's point of view?

Think of it this way. There is a struggle between two parties over how the new mother will spend her time for the immediate forseeable future. One of the contestants is the baby. The other is the employer. The people at Avantis just played one of their aces -- actually, a fairly costly card, but one that almost certainly makes good business sense -- in their attempt to win this contest. It's also worth remembering that government policy in most countries -- certainly in the U.S. and Australia -- is clearly on the side of employers, and therefore is busy putting its own, taxpayer-funded child care benefits on the table to match and supplement those private benefits offered by employers.

If I could wave a magic wand, I'd try to make the playing field much more level, seeking as fully as possible to eliminate the social-engineering effects of these various benefits, preferably by making child care benefits available to all families on an equal basis, irrespective of parents' labor force status. That way, mothers (and fathers) could make freer choices about what is best for the baby and best for the family. And while I was at it, I'd also make everyone, under penalty of being laughed at, stop using the term "family friendly" to describe hefty cash incentives whereby the bosses encourage new mothers hire baby sitters so that they can GET BACK TO WORK.

I cut my teeth on the political left, and so it amazes me to hear "work-family" advocates heap praise on these corporate executives, as if whatever is good for big business is also good for ordinary families.

Aother report here.


 
BIAS!: The first sentence of a 1986 Journal of Marriage and the Family article on courtship patterns for divorced adults:
A survey of recent courtship literature indicates a bias in this field toward studying young, hetereosexual, never-married persons.
What a shocking prejudice.


 
Marshall Miller points out a problem with Mona Charen's column on cohabitation.


 
The Christian Science Monitor on single women adopting children.


 
In Illinois, a state lawmaker proposed a bill that would require couples to go through pre-marital education before tying the knot. It failed miserably, 103-9. Good.


Wednesday, March 19, 2003
 
GOTTA LOVE SALON (cont.): Article descriptions at Salon today:
I was a '70s teenage slut
In a remarkable memoir of her wild teen years, author Kathy Dobie reflects on the mysteries of adolescent sex and the female quest for freedom

Since you asked ... I want my husband to write a letter to my future lovers, telling them that the demise of our marriage was his fault.

In this way, Salon is similar to The Onion: wonderful headlines and article descriptions, but the articles themselves are often not worth the time it takes to read them.


 
MADISON AVENUE is discovering adoption as a way to define and reach a market segment:
While adoption is not an especially foreign concept in American life -- by some estimates there are nearly six million adopted people in the United States -- the advertising industry has done little to reflect the numbers. That is beginning to change. Images of adoptive families are becoming a familiar sight in print advertisements and television commercials for companies and brands as varied as Weight Watchers, Ikea, J. C. Penney, Tide, Merrill Lynch and John Hancock ... Generally, adoptive parents are white, upper middle class, well educated and prepared to spend on anything "remotely related to the child and the sense of family," said Dr. Judith Lee, executive director of Advocates for Adoption, an adoption agency in Manhattan. "They have waited so long to be parents, and they are so thrilled that they probably overbuy. They take more pictures; they buy more upscale baby furniture, more strollers."



 
WILLIAM DOHERTY is mentioned in a Slate article on stressed-out kids.


 
In Manchester, over half of new fathers say they would take paternity leave.




Tuesday, March 18, 2003
 
MOM, BABY, AND THE WAL-MART MANAGER: I wrote here about the recent emergence in our society of a new kind of childbirth story -- a pregnant single woman about to give birth but unable to get to the hospital, rescued by a nearby guy who ends up with his picture in the paper holding the baby. Now comes People magazine with a cover story, "Whoa, Baby!" which includes this story of baby Michael:
Toothbrush? Check. Nightgown? Check. Disposable camera? Oh no! thought Katherine Williams when her 19-year-old daughter Shenna went into labor on June 22. With Shenna in tow, Katherine drove to a Wal-Mart in Albany, Ga., to buy last-minute supplies. But baby Michael Jerrod Moffitt Jr. (named after Shenna's ex-boyfriend) couldn't wait. "It probably wasn't even two minutes," says Shenna. "He just came out hollering."
Shenna asked Adrian Wright, the Wal-Mart night manager who helped her, to be the baby's godfather. He said yes. He seems like a nice guy.


 
ANDREW SULLIVAN has a compelling article on the history of the relationship between sodomy and the law in The New Republic (available to subscribers only). Sullivan, as usual, makes an articulate and thoughtful case for same-sex marriage. And he does not want to see the institution weakened for heterosexuals, either. Excerpt:
There is something unique and miraculous about the connection between male-female sex and the creation of new life. Its connection to a marital structure in which that new life can be nurtured, protected, and elevated is also one that is obviously vital to defend. Catholic thinkers have developed the most elaborate modern doctrine on this subject. That doctrine affirms something life-giving and important: the nexus between sex, marriage, and family. As a symbol of what sexuality can be about, indeed what it is ultimately about, this linkage makes moral and theological sense. It also makes social sense. The data that children are better adjusted when they grow up in stable, nurturing, traditional homes is overwhelming. It makes all the sense in the world for a society to find a way to celebrate and protect this arrangement for, if nothing else, the benefit of the next generation.



 
FROM THE DAILY OKLAHOMAN: A story on the Oklahoma Marriage Initiative.


 
GOTTA LOVE SALON: I didn't actually read this piece, but what a description:
Trans family values
HBO Films' "Normal" is supposedly a pro-tolerance paean about a marriage that survives a sex change. So why does it make us root for divorce?



 
CHILDREN'S MORALS: The New York Times has a fascinating article today on moral development in children. The money quote is from Harvard psychology professor Jerome Kagan, who says, "After hunger, a human's most important need is to know what's virtuous."


 
"The difficulty in finding the enrichment he and his wife sought came as an epiphany to Dennis Stoica. It set him on a mission that has become a full- time avocation. Last summer, Stoica launched the Orange County Marriage Resource Center, at www.OCMarriage.org. It is a clearinghouse of marriage-related workshops, books, tapes and other information for couples in various stages of a relationship. But Stoica didn't stop there. The Web site served as the catalyst for a collaborative that meets monthly and embraces pastors, therapists, counselors and peer mentors. All share the goal of reducing divorce in Orange County. Stoica has attracted a core group of about 25 people committed to the collaborative, called Orange County Marriage Ministries."


Monday, March 17, 2003
 
A Fox affiliate in Raleigh, N.C., has pulled the network's unscripted series Married by America from its lineup. WRAZ-TV pulled the show after its second airing on March 5. The station says the series, in which viewers help match up single men and women who then get engaged before they ever meet, "demeans and exploits the institution of marriage."


 
REMEMBER THIS ISSUE FROM THE EARLY 90s? Interesting article on Elizabeth Loftus and the controversies connected to "repressed memories" of child abuse.



 
MONA CHAREN on the recent Census data.


 
MORE COVERAGE OF MARRIAGE/HAPPINESS STUDY:
Marriage can leave you happier, sadder or unchanged. But you'd better hope it's the first category, because it's likely to be permanent. A 15-year study by US researchers shows that marriage has the power to affect quality of life for years. This contrasts with the popular psychological theory of adaptation - that people's well-being is independent of circumstances, even drastic ones like spinal injury or a lottery win. According to an international team lead by Michigan State University's Richard Lucas, the married population, on average, is no happier in the years after marriage than in the years before marriage. But the "average" hides great changes up and down. "It is not the case that, after marriage, all people adapt back to their starting level of satisfaction," wrote Dr Lucas. "Instead many people end up happier than they were before the event, whereas a similar amount amount end up less happy than they started." By contrast, adaptation theory holds that everyone returns to their so-called "baseline" happiness soon after major life events.
This reporting of the study's findings seems to contradict the reporting in the Reuters story I linked below, and the Reuters report sounded a bit fishy to me at the time. Guess I gotta read the study.

More coverage of the study here.


 
DOES MARRIAGE MAKE YOU HAPPIER?: There's more coverage of that new German study on marriage and happiness from the Minneapolis Star Tribune, which quotes Barbara Dafoe Whitehead and The Case for Marriage. Reuters's story quotes David Popenoe, and Australia's ABC quotes a critic of the study:
"The big mistake these researchers have made is that they've only looked at marriage, and have forgotten to measure the effect other things such as children and mortgages," [Professor Bob]Cummins told ABC Science Online.

He agreed there was a dip in life satisfaction in people aged 30 to 50, irrespective of marriage, but argues that this is likely to be due to the increase in responsibilities at that time. He disagrees that adaptation is likely to be a key factor.

"Marriage is not an event like buying a new car," he said. "It's a dynamic ongoing process that provides social connectedness which is very important to humans."

I hope that discussion and debte about this study will continue.



Sunday, March 16, 2003
 
Kay Hymowitz says that leading U.S. feminists aren't supporting Muslim women. Sara Hasan Nagy disagrees.


 
"Most newlyweds experience a brief emotional bounce after their wedding, but they eventually return to the same outlook they had on life before they tied the knot, according to a study released on Sunday. 'We found that people were no more satisfied after marriage than they were prior to marriage,' the researchers said. The study was published in the March issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, a publication of the American Psychological Association."


 
AMAZINGLY WEAK JOURNALISM: In Sunday's WaPo, Albert Crenshaw has a piece taking the Bush Administration to task for claiming to support marriage while ignoring the fact that the federal tax code penalizes married couples. Does something sound wrong to you about that argument? Listen to Crenshaw wax superior:
So, if the Bush administration really wants to encourage marriage why not fix the marriage penalty -- especially given that in other contexts, the administration argues that taxes are a major influence on people's behavior? The conventional answer is that eliminating the penalty, especially without also eliminating the "marriage bonus" that single-income couples receive, would cost the government a lot of revenue. But this is an administration that appears undaunted by budget deficits. Its tax and revenue proposals for fiscal 2004 would cost the government nearly $1.5 trillion over the next 10 years ... Maybe the answer is that it doesn't really care all that much about marriage.
Meanwhile, back on planet Earth, the Bush Administration recently proposed, and the Republican majority in the Congress is strongly supporting, a proposal to do pretty much exactly what Crenshaw is chiding them for not proposing to do! The article is filled with other errors, some of them comical. Amazing that a journalist at a national newspaper would be this uninformed about his subject. (For a similar problem on the same topic in the NYTs, see here.)


 
Salon reviews Andrew Hacker's new book, Mismatch: The Growing Gulf Between Women and Men.


 
"Interracial marriage gender gap grows": Black women and Asian men in America face a tough marriage market.


 
The Washington Post has a column on marriage and taxes.