|
Saturday, March 15, 2003
Excerpt from The Bitch in the House.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 3:21 PM |Link
"If nothing else, the conflict in the Middle East has been good for the institution of marriage," said Ronald Culpepper, a judge in Pierce County.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 3:08 PM |Link
AS GOOD AS IT GETS: Recently I wrote about the HBO series for children, "Happily Ever After," in which all the female characters are brave and good, and almost all the male characters are stupid lunkheads seriously in need of re-education, which they get. Now, with my daughters, who love the series, I've seen "Robinita," the story of a little girl who's "tough as iron" but has a "heart of gold." Robinita lives in the woods and spends her time taking from the rich and giving .. you get it. They guy who likes her -- who, somewhat uncharacteristically, really isn't such a bad guy -- sings a song about her that says: "When it comes to archery, that ninia has an eye! Although I never beat her, at least sometimes I tie." Seems pretty much to sum it up.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 11:52 AM |Link
WORKING BOTH SIDES OF THE FENCE: Danielle Steel's new book is Dating Game. The NYTs ad reads: "Getting dumped and getting over it! A novel of the horrible, wonderful, terrifying, roller-coaster ride of life-after-divorce."
Seeing the ad reminded me of Steel's 1989 children's book, Martha's New Daddy. Martha (age 5): "And what if they [Mommy and Mommy's new husband] have a baby?" Daddy: "They might. And I might get married and have more children, too. But that wouldn't make us love you less. You're our special little girl, and you always will be."
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 11:47 AM |Link
Friday, March 14, 2003
HARD TO KEEP THIS STRAIGHT: "Slape is one of three people charged with the sale of that baby from the ex-girlfriend to Slape's ex-wife."
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 10:38 PM |Link
Senator John Edwards (D-SC), who is running for president, has spelled out his family policy.
Most of his speech struck me as the usual blah, blah -- the same thing that Gore said, and that Clinton and Dukakis said -- with one exception. He seems to be trying to show at least a little creativity on the issue of maternal equity:Today, I'm proposing a refundable Family Leave Tax Credit that will put $2,500 in the pockets of working families with newborns. That's more money than most Americans take home in a month. The Family Leave Tax Credit will give millions of parents their first chance to take real time off when they have a baby. This credit offers more than a chance for leave; it will give parents the power to make important decisions about how to help their children best. Parents who work part-time or stay at home can get the credit.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 5:07 PM |Link
FEELING VERY BUSY (CONT.):The more families can afford to do, the more their time is spread thinly over an ever-enlarging array of activities. It was a Swedish academic, Staffan Burenstam Linder, who in a landmark study, The Harried Leisure Class, first drew attention to a peculiar paradox of affluence. As a society produces more and more goods, people require correspondingly more time to enjoy them fully. But there are only 24 hours in a day. You could see this paradox expressed in the lives of the women's three children. Between the television, the computer and the PlayStation, it was hard for the children to choose how to allocate their "free" time: so many toys, so little unstructured time. Since Linder's paper was published in 1970, the "leisure class" of its title has virtually disappeared. Work hours have increased, not fallen, as was widely expected 30 years ago. In some ways it's the worst of all possible worlds: more affluence, more consumer goods but less time to enjoy it all. No wonder the middle class whinge about feeling rushed.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 4:51 PM |Link
STAYING LONGER, OR RETURNING?:It seems the 20-something generation leaves home about the same age their parents and grandparents did, with the change over 50 years remarkably small. The surprise findings were presented to a conference in Melbourne this week. The conference heard a range of papers all based on a landmark data set called the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey, funded by the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. The study on leaving home canvassed people from 15 years to over 80 and found only slight variations in the story. This was despite the younger generations having stayed in education longer and found partners later. "The idea that kids are never leaving home simply has to be discarded," said Paul Flatau, a co-author of the study. "Young people have a natural urge to leave and be independent. That's part of life." The difference now may be that young people leave the parental home but return in hard times. With relationships and the labour market less stable, they treat the parental home as a refuge, he said. It seems that part of this phenomenon may be the result of young people returning home after divorces or (in the case of daughters) after unwed child bearing.
P.S. Here's an editorial (scroll down) on the topic.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 4:43 PM |Link
GET MARRIED, AISLE THREE:The Plus supermarket chain feels that it is now in a good position to woo some of the 400,000 couples who marry in Germany every year. But traditional wedding businesses, which have seen their profits dive over recent months, have hit back. "A discount wedding can't possibly work," said Sabine Stehle, of Creative Wedding Service. "A wedding is an emotional experience and you can't just pick it up at your local supermarket."
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 4:34 PM |Link
THERE FOR THE BIRTH:"We're all dads so we all had a little bit of an idea. It was a privilege when he came out. I was in the right place at the right time. He shot out into my hands and I was the first one to hold him. I see these stories regularly now. Pregnant mother about to deliver, in trouble, on the street or stuck in traffic. A good samaritan police officer or fire fighter comes to the rescue, gets her to the hospital, the baby is born, everything is fine. There is always a great photo of mother, baby and police officer(s), all smiles. The caption or voice-over always says, how great that this guy stepped in to help. A happy ending for all. Surely I'm not the only one who notices, every time I see one of these set-piece stories, that someone is literally missing from the picture.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 4:14 PM |Link
NEW YORKER CARTOON: Stern wife to nervous husband: "You're not in material breach, but you're not in full compliance, either."
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 4:08 PM |Link
SECOND TIME AROUND: "Emotional maturity means relationships in later years can be more fulfilling, say many longtime couples and couples finding love the second or third time around." But no mention in this piece of the fact that, in general, second and third marriages are significantly more likely to end in divorce than first marriages.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 2:09 PM |Link
MY FRIEND AMITAI ETZIONI, the founder of the Communitarian Network, has a new blog. He's one smart (and good) guy, including about marriage and family issues.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 2:00 PM |Link
DIVORCE BUS:Team Metro has been using the bus since June for its "Government on the Go" program, which takes passport applications and various simple permits out to the far reaches of the county. But Friday -- parked outside the Caleb Center -- was its first time as a divorce court on wheels. Within an hour, 18 marriages were dissolved.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 1:41 PM |Link
"Moments later she told a reporter, 'When I said our marriage needed a miracle, I didn't know this would be it.'"
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 1:34 PM |Link
ARE THREE BETTER THAN TWO?: In Canada, a lesbian couple raising a young boy has asked the courts to give the boy's biological mother's partner full parental rights (yes, I know that sounds confusing). That means that the boy would have three legal parents: his biological mom, his biological dad, and his biological mom's partner. I told Stanley Kurtz about this case, and he wrote a column on it. Key paragraph:Once we cross the border into legalized multiple parenthood, we have virtually arrived at the abolition of marriage and the family. The logic of gay marriage leads inexorably to the end of marriage, and the creation in its place of an infinitely flexible series of contracts. Monogamous marriage cannot function if it is just one of many social arrangements. Marriage as an institution depends for its successful functioning upon the support and encouragement that the ethos of monogamy receives from society as a whole. If anything can be called a marriage � including group marriage � then the ethos of monogamy that keeps families together will have been broken, and the social reinforcement that is the essence of marriage itself will be gone. Again, it is children who will pay the price. I find this to be the strongest argument against gay marriage. Beneath the persuasive happy talk of �love makes a family� are serious threats to marriage. In my mind, the key question is, how slippery is the slope?
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 1:02 AM |Link
"Transgender Professor Talks Marriage":Whittle also proposed the idea of The Family Contract. This would not take sex into account when considering an individuals rights involving civil marriage. He stated the family contract would allow, "a new understanding of family law and hence marriage, opening it up to new family constructs in which the family becomes a place of social obligation rather than blood and sexual ties."
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 12:17 AM |Link
WHAT IS RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD?: For rapper 50 Cent, it's buying your 6-year-old son a custom-made bulletproof vest.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 12:04 AM |Link
Thursday, March 13, 2003
WOMEN, MATING, AND MARRIAGE (CONT.):But there is also another much darker reason women in their 30s and early 40s are alone. And perhaps this is of our own making. The mating rules have collapsed. And we, women and men, have allowed it to happen. Those unwritten rules that drive romance, courting, love and an oath to commitment have disintegrated. And we've largely given up on the structures that once supported these rituals, such as engagements, marriages, vows "for better or worse, till death do us part", and so on. The problem is we haven't really replaced the old-fashioned stuff with anything better. Living with a lover is as simple as shifting a bit of furniture. Leaving can be just a matter of handing your keys back. We've made it easy to walk out, walk away and move on: each time steeling ourselves against further disappointment. In the end, the lesson is a selfish one about individual preservation and the protection of "me". All of which is fine, if we want to remain alone, or in the transit lounge of commitment.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 10:44 PM |Link
MOST STRIKING STATISTIC:Nationally, 43 percent of unmarried couples living together are raising children, nearly matching the 46 percent figure for the nation's married couples. And the trend is climbing for unmarried couples, while it is becoming less common for married couples to have children living with them. A pdf of the Census report is available here.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 10:35 PM |Link
NEW CENSUS DATA on the rising numbers of cohabiting couples. The New York Times, the Washington Post, the Associated Press, and the Christian Science Monitor all have articles on it.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 8:15 PM |Link
Wednesday, March 12, 2003
"Alabama looks at raising age for marriage from 14 to 16." Right now, fourteen-year-olds can get married in Alabama?!? We're talking eighth-graders! In eighth grade, I don't think I even knew how to talk to girls, let alone marry one. Almost all of them were taller than me.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 1:36 AM |Link
MADONNA--ROBO IN PARADISE:The Queen of Pop said of her relationship with Guy, 34: �I actually think marriage is a very important thing. I had to work hard to get a good marriage. Everyone does. �You have to make a lot of efforts and compromises. I knew Guy was the right person in five minutes but it took me several years to actually make it happen.� If you're wondering what a robo in paradise is, check out "Robos in Paradise" by Kay Hymowitz and wonder no more.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 12:40 AM |Link
Tuesday, March 11, 2003
If you're a parent and in the military, deployment brings new challenges and stress to your family. Now imagine if you're a single parent. Newsweek reports,Those familiar media images of husbands and wives bidding each other tearful farewells on docks and airfields tell only part of the story. According to the Pentagon, the number of single moms and dads in the military has nearly doubled since the last gulf war from 47,685 in 1992 to almost 90,000 today. Despite the dramatic increase, however, the Pentagon has no special programs in place for them. Military officials aren�t even sure why the numbers are up. �That�s not something we could speculate on,� says Lt. Col. Cynthia Colin, a Pentagon spokeswoman. �We recruit people, and the people in the military reflect society.�
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 12:55 PM |Link
HUGS HELP THE HEART: No, that�s not just some cheesy saying. According to a study presented at the American Psychosomatic Society, �A brief hug and 10 minutes of handholding with a romantic partner greatly reduce the harmful physical effects of stress.�
USA TODAY reports that the study was based on a sample of 285 adults with �spouses or long-term partners.� Whenever I see that �spouses or partners� formulation, I�m always curious to know how many in the sample are the latter. Is it a significant number, or do the researchers just add �partners� to be more inclusive?
Tiffany Field of the Touch Research Institute (which sounds like a joke, but is based at the University of Miami Medical School) says that this study adds to research suggesting that humans are �hard-wired� to be social animals. Also:U.S. couples aren't very "touchy-feely" in public, Field says. Her studies in U.S. and Parisian cafes show that French couples spend about three times as much time touching as Americans. People-watching at Parisian cafes. Sounds like nice work, if you can get it.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 11:39 AM |Link
DOES DIVORCE MAKE PEOPLE HAPPY?: Third Age has an article on the Institute's report, and the story is featured on MSN's "Love and Relationships" homepage.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 10:31 AM |Link
Monday, March 10, 2003
NORTH DAKOTA NEWS: Legislators in my home state are debating whether or not to repeal an anti-cohabitation law. (link via Cohabitation Nation)
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 12:47 PM |Link
MATERNITY LEAVE:Dr Duxbury has recently completed a major study on how Canadian employees balance their work and family responsibilities, which involved nearly 32,000 workers from 100 public, private and not-for-profit organisations. She is in Australia to take part in the Federation Dialogue Series, a program arranged by the Canadian High Commission and the Association for Canadian Studies in Australia and New Zealand.Canada's parental leave scheme gives new parents up to 50 weeks of leave, paid by the government at a rate of 55 per cent of average weekly earnings. Employers can top up the payments to 100 per cent of an employee's wage. Dr Duxbury said Canada was now planning a scheme in which employees may take several months' leave - paid at the same rate - to care for ageing parents.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 11:33 AM |Link
EDITORIAL: "Where fathers do fight for custody, they win up to 40 per cent of cases. This is good news for families - and divorced couples with children to raise are still families, despite their new configuration."
I see this argument all the time, and I simply can't follow the logic. Lots of divorce, more and more couples "fighting" over custody, and higher proportions of children of divorce living with their fathers but not their mothers. This is "good news for families"? To me, it sounds like lousy news. Do we imagine that the children involved view it as "good news"? That they are pleased with their "new configurations"?
People seem to think that there is something progressive about more and more one-parent homes being headed by fathers. I suspect that some of it has to do with a generalized elite suspiciousness regarding gender roles, especially those retro "traditional" ones. In addition, I think that some of it has to do with a kind of willful utopianism -- largely unsupported by social science evidence -- regarding the good things that can happen for children in the "new configurations" that result from family breakup.
I do agree that sometimes father custody after divorce is in the best interest of the child. But now that we have mostly stopped romanticizing mother-only homes, it is really a good idea to start romanticizing father-only homes?
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 10:58 AM |Link
HONOR KILLINGS (CONT.):Police are to examine the scale of "honour crimes" in the Asian community amid growing evidence that women are being subjected to violence and sometimes murdered for refusing to obey the traditions of their culture.Those working with young women across British Asian communities have charted a number of cases in which they have been subjected to violence by family members for choosing to follow an independent path.Their perceived crimes can include wanting to go to university, refusing an arranged marriage or having a boyfriend.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 10:41 AM |Link
BAD RAP: A study of 522 black girls found that those who watch a lot of gangsta rap videos were more likely to engage in destructive behaviors than those who rarely or never watch such videos. Of course there are always the "Yes, But..." apologists, who point to other causes:"Yes, there are rap videos that are particularly violent or sexual, but let's look at what is more important in whether or not these kids act out of behaviors -- their family structure and the type of parenting they get," says Cheryl Keyes, PhD, associate professor of ethnomusicology at UCLA and author of Rap Music and Street Consciousness. (emphasis added) We've reached a point where professors of ethnomusicology who defend violent, misogynistic lyrics argue that we should focus more on family structure as a "more important" influence on problem behavior. Holla!
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 10:29 AM |Link
THE FAMILY DEBATE IN CUBA: Fascinating article from the Inter Press Service:HAVANA, Mar 7 (IPS) - The Catholic Church is concerned about the growing number of female-headed households in Cuba, although others see the phenomenon as just one aspect of a trend towards more flexible models of the family.
''In Cuba a matriarchy is taking shape, and the 'crisis of fatherhood' is increasingly affecting'' our children, said the Archbishop of Havana, Cardinal Jaime Ortega, in a recent pastoral letter.
The family is suffering the ''devastating weight'' of the ''extraordinary number of divorces and couples living together out of wedlock,'' and the paternal figure ''is becoming more and more ill-defined and blurry,'' due to physical absence or a lack of authority, he wrote.
But Manuel Cuesta, the head of the Democratic Socialist Movement (CSD), said Cuban society was moving towards ''a new kind of family,'' in the framework of new forms of social organisation, and that ''this does not necessarily have to be negative, as many other nations have demonstrated.'' � ''Rather than a crisis of ethics, couples who live together without being married reflect a new conception of the family,'' said the head of the Centre for Population and Development Studies of the National Office of Statistics, Juan Carlos Alfonso Fraga.
For her part, university Professor Olga Mesa, a jurist, maintained that the high divorce rate is part of ''the archetype of the new family, free of all hypocrisy and authentically based on new conceptions of how life should be lived.'' It�s striking how similar the debate seems, though I hope in America we�ve had enough experience to discard the professor�s misguided notion that father absence is somehow the harbinger of a great new era in family life.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 12:50 AM |Link
PARENTS�DO YOUR KIDS LISTEN TO THE WHITE STRIPES?: If so, don�t worry. The White Stripes are smarter than your average MTV band. From The New York Times Magazine:You've said that your band's new album, ''Elephant,'' is about the ''death of the sweetheart.'' What does that mean? JACK WHITE: The sweetheart, the gentleman -- it's the same thing. These ideas seem to be in decline, and I hate it. You look at your average teenager with the body piercings and the tattoos. You have white kids going around talking in ghetto accents because they think that makes them hard. It's so cool to be hard. We're against that.
So are you proposing that people embrace the values of a previous era? JACK: No, I don't want to be considered old-fashioned or a Luddite or conservative. But it's sad to see young kids today -- they're sitting around listening to hip-hop or new metal, with a Sony PlayStation, a bong of marijuana. This is their life. It's a whole culture. And the parenting is so relaxed about that.
In other words, kids need discipline. That sounds counter to the rock 'n' roll ideal. JACK: It's not counter to us. It's what our band is about. � Listen to a clip of the song �Fell in Love with a Girl� or watch the video.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 12:16 AM |Link
Sunday, March 09, 2003
FROM AFGHANISTAN:It's especially true for husbands and wives. Women with little status or education have almost no recourse against perceived grievances brought by in-laws. Death remains a punishment for adultery, although it isn't known whether such sentences have been given out since the Taliban's fall. While Afghan legal officials talk about improvements in the quality of justice -- such as ensuring the right to a fair trial and appeal -- they hold that Islamic-based law will continue to form the basis of the system.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 3:13 PM |Link
Columnist Jeff Jacoby on the legal contest in Massachusetts on same-sex marriage.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 3:07 PM |Link
"BLAZED A TRAIL FOR DIVORCE": More evidence that the Aussie debate on maternal equity and maternal feminism is heating up -- an angry attack on Barbara Dafoe Whitehead's and Sylvia Ann Hewlett's recent books on women's choices, children, and marriage.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 3:02 PM |Link
From a great little essay in the New York Times on Michael Jackson and Mister Rogers:Children can't set limits for themselves, of course; they need adults to do that. Fred Rogers was of a time and a tradition in children's television (and in child rearing) in which adults were thought to be the best teachers for young children. And Mister Rogers was the kindest of teachers, and of authority figures. He is irreplaceable � not that anyone has tried very hard to replace him. Oh, there are Steve and Joe of Nickelodeon's preschool show "Blue's Clues," but they're more like big brothers than true grown-ups. Very young kids can spend an entire morning in front of the tube with otherwise worthwhile shows like "Bob the Builder," "Arthur" and "Dora the Explorer" and not see a human adult face. On shows for older kids and on primetime sitcoms, adulthood is ridiculed more often than not and dads are buffoons (d'oh!). It's kiddie anarchy out there.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 2:52 PM |Link
FROM AUSTRALIA: "Despite persistent criticism that the court is anti-male, almost 20 per cent of child-residence decisions are being settled in the father's favour -- twice the rate of earlier decades. Court figures show that as recently as the mid-1990s, only 15 per cent of residence applications were decided in favour of the father."
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 2:50 PM |Link
DEMONIZING SINGLE MOMS?: "When you look at the millions and millions of single moms," she says, "we should have something for them to hold on to. There should be a message that is encouraging to the single mom. Show them some role models." Instead, she says, there is a steady drumbeat of negativity from her ranks -- statistics and studies and dire warnings about how much more likely the children of single parents are to mess up in school, get hooked on drugs, grow up to divorce their spouses. "The message from Democrats is very encouraging to single parents," says Buchanan. "It's something very natural for them. Not conservative Republicans. You get the message, 'You already failed; it's too late.' " Interestingly, the person being profiled in this piece is Bay Buchanan, Pat Buchanan's sister and former campaign manager. And also herself a single mother.
The marriage buffs I know wrestle with this question a lot. (How could we avoid it, even if we wanted to? So often, when I give a talk on this subject, someone stands up during question time and says that she is a single mother, and that she is angry and upset that I seem to be blaming her.) Most marriage buffs I know don't want to be self-righteous. They don't want to suggest to other people that they, or their children, are doomed to failure, since of course they are not. I always try to remind myself of Solzhenitzyn's comment, that the line separating good and bad does run between you and me, but through the middle of every human heart. If Bay Buchanan, or anyone, can come up with an argument that avoids sanctimoniousness and models sincerity, sympathetic understanding, and genuine human respect, while also not ignoring or sugar-coating the difficult truths of how high rates of family fragmentation harm children and society, that would be a terrific step forward.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 2:13 PM |Link
FROM DAVE BARRY:"Have you ever wondered," she writes, "why it takes a bride months and months to plan a wedding, but a good funeral can be pulled together in two days? The elements are all the same -- church, minister, music, flowers, guests, food." Lori is absolutely right. What we need is a law prohibiting brides from planning their weddings more than, say, a week in advance. A bride caught violating this law would be subject to severe punishment, such as being forced to walk down the aisle to the tune of "I Shot the Sheriff." Wouldn't that be great? Brides -- and their loved ones -- would be spared months of insanity. Weddings would be simpler, cheaper and more relaxed. Everybody would win! Except of course the people who put out the bridal magazines. It reminds me of Judith Martin's observation that, as marriage as an institution weakens and become less distinctive, we pay more and more attention to ... the ceremony.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 2:07 PM |Link
HIS MARRIAGE VERSUS HER MARRIAGE IN THE 1960s?: "Surveys in the 1960s found married women, and single men, had the poorest physical and mental health. Today married women and men report similar happiness levels... " These sentences, in The Age, caught my eye and made me wonder. So I wrote to Linda Waite of the University of Chicago, who to my mind is the most careful and respected academic authority on just this subject: "Linda: This is from a newspaper story. Is this true, or just rehashed Jessie Bernard stuff that doesn't hold up?" Her reply: "Rehashed Jesse Bernard, and it doesn't hold up." Waite's research on this topic can be found here and here.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 1:45 PM |Link
|