|
Saturday, March 01, 2003
TEEN DRINKING:Under-age drinkers consume about 20 percent of all the alcohol imbibed in this country, according to a report published last week in The Journal of the American Medical Association ... Teenage drinking rates have fallen by some measures in recent decades, a change that may be partly attributable to the legal drinking age's being raised to 21 in all states. But as often happens when it comes to the relationship between Americans and alcohol, many of the young people who continue to drink appear to be the very ones least able to control their consumption.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 10:28 PM |Link
OBESITY (CONT.):The economists � Shin-Yi Chou, Henry Saffer and Michael Grossman � presented their findings in a working paper called "An Economic Analysis of Obesity" for the National Bureau of Economic Research. In the paper, the economists note that the number of fast-food restaurants per capita doubled in the United States from 1972 to 1997, a period in which obesity, well, ballooned. In analyzing the relationship of weight to incomes, food prices, restaurants, workforce participation and other variables, the economists concluded that the growth of fast food accounted for 68 percent of the rise in American obesity. Why all this fast food? As women devoted more time to paid work, the theory goes, they had less time for cooking, a burden that the men in their lives (who typically spend more time at their jobs) presumably had little time or interest in assuming. Fast-food restaurants � offering cheap, convenient meals dense with fat and calories � rushed in to fill the vacuum.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 10:18 PM |Link
NATIONAL MARRIAGE WEEK IN BRITAIN: Here (scroll down to "Three Cheers for Marriage") and here (from the Daily Telegraph, requires registration) and here. And (from last year, also from the Daily Telegraph) here.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 5:28 PM |Link
MATERNAL EQUITY (CONT.): Australian Prime Minister John Howard plans a renewed focus on family policy:In anticipation of his anniversary speech, at a Cabinet meeting last week Howard gave a detailed presentation to his ministers about family policies. Enamoured by the work of British sociologist Catherine Hakim, Howard's PowerPoint presentation included extracts from her essential thesis: that working mothers are divided into three groups. The first, stay-at-homes, comprise only 20 per cent; the second, who are work-centric, also make up 20 per cent; and the third and largest group, who adapt to circumstances and move in and out of the workforce depending on the children's age, make up the remaining 60 per cent. Howard's enthusiasm for Hakim's work - which is critical of largesse to work-centred mothers and emphasises the need to make life easier for stay-at-home and "adaptive" mums - has ensured her panaceas will be critical to the Government's policy development. And:The idea is that the new homemaker payment would be available to any mother for baby's first year - injecting around $6,000 as a one-off into the family budget that year. The new payment would become part of an existing tranche of family payments offered by the Government, including the baby bonus, which is paid to stay-at-home mothers; the parenting payment; two sets of family tax benefits, which are means-tested; child-care subsidies; and a maternity allowance. As well, the Government is considering a 14-week paid maternity leave proposal put forward by Sex Discrimination Commissioner Pru Goward late last year. Among other things, this story is a pretty dramatic example of the influence of one family scholar on (another!) nation's public policy.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 4:51 PM |Link
MORE, IF YOU ARE INTERESTED, ON THE BREAST-FEEDING AUSSIE MP:But mothers of the future may not be grateful for this added pressure to be a lactating superwoman less than two weeks after giving birth. Breastfeeding is difficult enough even for a woman with nothing else to do. For a woman with a full-time job outside the home, it can be a nightmare ... No one wants to go back to the days when children were seen and not heard and breastfeeding mothers had to hide in toilets. But neither should parents' rights be allowed to override common sense and economic reality. What's more, the push for feminist concessions in the workplace is in danger of reaching farcical levels which ultimately will make employers think twice before hiring women. I' sure that much more can, and will, be said about this incident.
As in this letter to the editor (scroll down): "Clearly there is no election looming in Victoria, otherwise politicians would inevitably flock to a baby for some nice footage or happy snaps, rather than evict one from their sight."
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 4:36 PM |Link
THE LOS ANGELES TIMES "asked two nannies and two mothers who have hired nannies to watch the play and then discuss its issues of motherhood, child care, and the complex relationship between boss and nanny. Settling in at an office near the Taper, the women gather around a polished wood table to explore how the play reflects their lives."
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 4:27 PM |Link
FROM THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY archives (1988), more than you might want to know about "Love Triangles," including:According to Tony Tanner, an English critic, Western literature begins with The Iliad, a tale of war precipitated by an adulterous act, and "it is the unstable triangularity of adultery, rather than the static symmetry of marriage, that is the generative form of Western literature as we know it." Indeed, adultery has remained a prominent theme in Western literature: it is a major theme, Tanner points out, in Shakespeare's last plays and in Restoration drama, and many of the great nineteenth-century novels touch on it. Among these, one thinks immediately of Madame Bovary, The Red and the Black, and Anna Karenina. In these novels the theme of adultery dramatizes issues of authority and transgression not only in individual psychology but in the social order as well. When the adulterous impulse is enacted, it violates the rules of possession in both the private and the public sphere, most often with unfortunate results. Update: Here's a current love triangle story, from Britain.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 3:46 PM |Link
Friday, February 28, 2003
HOOKING UP AT HARVARD (cont.): In a staff editorial on efforts to end the dating drought at Harvard, the Daily Princetonian takes a jab at Harvard's "timid guys." Harvard men may be tempted to shrug off the accusation as stemming from an inferiority complex among Tigers, but the editors have a point. It takes more courage to call up a girl and ask her out, out of the blue, than it does to down a few beers and hook up. After all, she's much more likely to say yes to a date after you've already hooked up, provided that you weren't a horrible kisser.
Of course, the problem is not limited to shy guys. The Princetonian admits that "our generation's lack of rules makes dating daunting everywhere."
P.S. A female friend of mine pointed to wimpy, "over-womens-libbed" men as the problem.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 5:41 PM |Link
HOOKING UP AT HARVARD: A common complaint on college campuses these days (at least among women) is that the dating scene, like, totally sucks. Leave it up to Harvard students, though, to form a task force to address the problem.
"All we have are serious long-term relationships and random debauchery," explains freshmen Sungmi Choi. "There is a real lack of actual dating." (Sound familiar?) So Choi is heading up an official student committee whose mission is to improve the dating scene. Initial ideas include discount movie tickets sold in pairs and "a speaker series on dating etiquette." Methinks Miss Manners would approve, but is saddened that the state of affairs is so sorry.
Indeed. Dating committees on campus. Government programs that encourage people to marry (both here and abroad). What the heck is going on? Why is this happening? Why can't people meet, marry, and mate the way they used to?
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 4:14 PM |Link
NEW STUDY (CONT.): On the idea that working in the paid labor force part time as compared to full time reduces one's "negotiating power" in the home, one personal observation. I have seen quite a few couples who approach their marriages largely in terms of bargaining with one another, evaluating one another's self-interested claims about what constitutes fairness, and in general always "negotiating" over who gets what, and almost of these couples are unhappy. In fact, in my little world, most of them by now are divorced.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 3:49 PM |Link
On the new study by the Council on Contemporary Families -- Just a first reaction to the general findings of the study: It may be that the study tells us more about women physicians than it does about working women in general. Physicians spend many years in training and are often highly driven people who thrive on a model of independent decision-making (i.e, although health care professionals now often operate in teams, the physician�s word is the last word). Women physicians are often married to other physicians, or to men who are equally driven in their careers. It�s tough to spend more than a decade preparing for a highly-demanding career and then transition to part-time; it�s also tough to negotiate the many, unending tasks of home-making when both spouses are accustomed to a high degree of independence and authority in their professional lives.
posted by Elizabeth Marquardt
at 2:15 PM |Link
Polygamy in Utah
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 11:53 AM |Link
New study from the Council on Contemporary Families:In a survey of nearly 100 women physicians in two-career couples with at least one child under 14, those who worked full time reported better relationships with their husbands than those working reduced hours. Marital quality may actually suffer when mothers work part time, Barnett says. ... Barbara Risman, cochair of the council, explains that when a woman goes from a full-time to a part-time schedule, she may lose whatever negotiating power she had with her husband in getting him to become a more equal partner at home. 'Now he can say, Well, I work full time and you don't.' "
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 11:01 AM |Link
FROM A FRENCH STATE HOUSING PROJECT:The domination by boys is getting worse ... "It's everywhere, all the time. Beatings, rapes, the lot. The worst is the names they call you, especially if you're dressed in a girly way which makes you a slut," says Amel, 21 ... Home to many immigrants from the Maghreb, such suburbs have seen a rise in radical Islam that has turned attitudes toward women even harsher. Pressure is mounting for Muslim women to wear veils and forced marriages that snatch girls from college and a career are now commonplace. I recognize that a lot is going on here, but reading this story of teenage boys terrorizing all those around them, I wonder, how many married fathers live in this housing project? The story also remined me of the movie, City of God.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 10:14 AM |Link
"Teenage pregnancy rates across England and Wales have dropped for the third year in a row, official figures reveal."
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 9:39 AM |Link
Thursday, February 27, 2003
SPERM IS ALL YOU NEED: Today�s NYT reports:
Britain's top family court judge declared today that a black man whose sperm had mistakenly been used to fertilize the eggs of a white woman at a fertility clinic was the legal father of the twins born nine months later.
The woman who gave birth to the twins has a husband, and it was the two of them together who went to the fertility clinic, underwent treatments, and are raising the children as their own. The clinic mixed up sperm from another man who, with his wife, was also pursuing fertility treatments. Fortunately, the judge did not order the twins removed from the parents they have always known � but you have to ask why, when they already have a father, the judge decided sperm trumped all. (Admittedly, the judge was in a tough position. As the children get older it will be apparent that someone was involved in their birth in addition to the two parents raising them, and they will have questions.)
Even more importantly, how often does this kind of thing happen at fertility clinics? The �mistakes� are obvious when a child is born whose race differs from that of the parents (which has happened several times before, including recently when a white woman gave birth to one white baby and one black baby after visiting a fertility clinic in New York), but surely these are only the most obvious mix-ups. Other commentators have noted the astonishing extent to which fertility clinics are unregulated in this country (and perhaps in Britain too?).
posted by Elizabeth Marquardt
at 12:03 PM |Link
COLLEGE COURTSHIP PRACTICES: A college student informant tells me that on her liberal arts college campus it is common for a girl and a guy to have an online �secret relationship� (her term) in which they instant message (�IM�) each other at all hours of the day and night, sharing all kinds of thoughts and feelings � but then ignore each other or barely speak when they see each other in person.
In our report on college courtship practices, we did not address online relationships, so I�m at a loss on this one. Is this practice of sharing feelings online, but not in person, widespread? What does it mean? Is it another example of the reluctance of today�s young people to share their feelings face to face? How does this in-person anonymity connect with the hook up scene, in which people have random sexual encounters and then ignore the person when they see them the next day?
posted by Elizabeth Marquardt
at 11:45 AM |Link
Mister Rogers died today. What a wonderful man he was.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 11:36 AM |Link
WHAT DIVIDES EAST AND WEST (CONT.): Here's more about the study cited by Elizabeth Marquardt below.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 10:55 AM |Link
AUSTRALIANS DEBATE whether an MP in the Victorian Parliament should be permitted to breastfeed her baby while at work, here and here and here.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 10:47 AM |Link
CANADIAN DEBATE on same-sex marriage here. And here. And here.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 10:36 AM |Link
Wednesday, February 26, 2003
WHAT DIVIDES WEST AND EAST: In an article titled �The True Clash of Civilizations� in the current issue of Foreign Policy (March/April 2003), Ronald Inglehart and Pippa Norris write:
Samuel Huntington was only half right. The cultural fault line that divides the West and the Muslim world is not about democracy but about sex. According to a new survey, Muslims and their Western counterparts want democracy, yet they are worlds apart when it comes to attitudes towards divorce, abortion, gender equality, and gay rights � which may not bode well for democracy�s future in the Middle East.
posted by Elizabeth Marquardt
at 9:31 PM |Link
DIVORCE CULTURE: The current New Yorker nails it.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 2:19 PM |Link
AFTER THE DRUGS WORE OFF, Part III: Now I think I have a better understanding of the Hip Mamas and their talk of "commune-makers." They're blinded by their nostalgia for the 1970s. They need to drop their infatuation with an idealized past and look around to what children and families need in 2003. I'm sure Stephanie Coontz would agree.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 11:20 AM |Link
FROM AUSTRALIA: "The difficulty that the Bracks Government encountered last year in trying to legislate more equal terms for gay relationships in inheritance and other matters might seem to indicate that the wider community is not yet ready for recognition of gay marriage; the reality, however, is that such relationships exist, and that many of them include children, conceived in various ways. The truth is probably that there is no consensus on the question. In a secular democracy, that in itself should constrain how governments and parliaments respond to social change of this kind."
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 10:54 AM |Link
FROM BRITAIN: "'Laws needed' for children's diets." A "fat tax" on junk food advertising?
P.S. Here's an Australian call for banning junk food ads aimed at children. And here.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 10:20 AM |Link
"The teen birth rate in California is at a historic low. Between 1991 and 2000, the number of babies born to teen mothers in the state dropped from almost 72,000 to 53,000 ... Teen births have dropped across the country since the peak in 1991, but California's rate has fallen further, faster. At 47 births per 1,000 teen girls, it is now slightly below the national average."
Which is good news, but also a reminder that the real crisis is not "teen" births, but births to unmarried mothers, which still constitute about one of every three births in the U.S. and, amazingly, about 40 percent of all first-time births.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 10:03 AM |Link
Tuesday, February 25, 2003
AFTER THE DRUGS WORE OFF, PART II: Catherine Newman, in an essay titled "I Do. Not.: Why I Won't Marry" in the new collection, The Bitch in the House, explains that one reason why she and her live-in boyfriend (with whom she has a child) will not marry is because �we don�t believe in monogamy.� Yet, she says, although �honest nonmonogamy seemed liked the ideal solution,� it turns out to have a downside.
�Beliefs, even strongly held ones, can be somewhat aloof from a world in which people actually feel things,� making it hard �to simply turn our backs on convention.� (all italics hers)
Moreover:
�...it turns out, that third person inevitably has feelings too, of all things! �That third person might even be likely, in fact, to have extra feelings, the kind that find expression only in phoning compulsively throughout the night or popping by after supper with an ice pick. Michael [her boyfriend] and I were ultimately so strained by a few rounds of non-domestic toad-in-the-hole that we gave it up� [But] we still believe in the principle of nonmonogamy, even if we don�t have the energy to do it.� (p. 68)
posted by Elizabeth Marquardt
at 7:13 PM |Link
SELLING DAUGHTERS:Afghans involved with women's issues say the selling of young girls is on the rise. After a quarter-century of war, civil chaos and most recently drought, many families have been strained to the breaking point, and the outright selling of daughters for cash is one harsh result. The practice has a cultural basis here in southern Afghanistan, where prospective husbands have long paid a "bride price" for their wives � a kind of dowry that is traditionally set by the status of the bride's family and the resources of the groom's. But what was a custom has evolved into a market in which men can buy young girls from poor families. And with the country's legal system a shambles, there is nothing to stop them.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 7:11 PM |Link
AFTER THE DRUGS WORE OFF�: An article from a 1980 issue of the Journal of Marriage and the Family reviewed �Nontraditional Family Forms: A Decade of Research� (including things like �swinging� and such). The researcher concluded:The 1970s have brought an increased awareness of the stresses associated with complex relationship systems and a healthy respect for human limits. Anthropologists have long been aware of the elaborate normative and hierarchial structures required for the successful functioning of such systems. Those who reject such structures as alien to personal growth and flexibility have found that they and their significant others must instead possess the necessary personality characteristics and negotiation skills to develop their own norms. For some individuals this has worked, but it is now clear that most, at least at this stage of our societal development, find complex relationship systems, such as multilateral marriage, and communal life, too stressful to allow for long-term participation.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 3:17 PM |Link
MATERNAL EQUITY (CONT.). This just in from Australia.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 11:22 AM |Link
CHILD-FAT (CONT.): Can TV be part of the solution?It's a kind of theater of the absurd, especially when one considers that in the battle against childhood obesity, television is Public Enemy Number One. To some it is the primary cause of sedentary behavior, cravings for all foods fatty and caloric, and the dramatic rise in childhood fatness. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one out of three kids aged 6 to 19 is overweight or obese. That's triple the proportion that were carrying too much weight in 1980. But the three visual arts professionals and moms (two from Bethesda, one from Kensington) behind the federally funded "Dynamotion" project believe that to view TV only as a villain in the childhood fat epidemic is a copout -- or at least a missed opportunity. No one doubts TV's power to influence and educate, they reason, so why shouldn't it be enlisted in the fight against obesity and inactivity, instead of being used as a scapegoat?
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 11:14 AM |Link
"Divorce planners are lining up to help couples uncouple": "Divorce planners have joined the swelling ranks of investigators, forensic accountants and lawyers that couples now employ in what some call 'the exit process.'"
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 10:44 AM |Link
NORMALIZING FAMILY FRAGMENTATION (cont.): In the movie "Old School" (currently the #1 comedy in America), lead character Luke Wilson's love interest is a single mother of a young girl. There is no mention at all of the girl's father, whether or not her mom got divorced, nothing. No need to even explain; it's totally normal. But the mom does move in with a new boyfriend before finding out he's a jerk. Which, unfortunately, may also be normal. Warning: You'll probably hate this movie unless you're an immature guy who finds the idea of Will Ferrell hittin' the beer bong and then streaking down Main Street to be hilarious. Full disclosure: I found Will Farrell hittin' the beer bong and then streaking down Main Street to be hilarious.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 10:25 AM |Link
Monday, February 24, 2003
FROM NEWSEEK'S CURRENT "MY TURN":Much of what I know about Emily I learned after her death. I learned that her parents divorced when she was an infant. She never had a relationship with her father. It pained her to know he had remarried and was living with children he could talk to, hug and play with every day. Her mother married and divorced several times. Emily became lost in blended families. Toward the end of her life, Jordan told me, she was depressed and cut her flesh when her emotional pain became too great. I had never heard about cutting. I couldn�t imagine why a person would do that.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 10:43 PM |Link
I think it's official that obesity, especially childhood obesity, is getting its fifteen minutes in the sun.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 6:17 PM |Link
"KIDS HAMPER MOM'S--BUT NOT DAD'S--NEW RELATIONSHIP":NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - While having children from a previous relationship tends to reduce a Mom's chance of a new relationship, new research suggests these children can be a bonus for Dad's. ... These findings suggest that new mates believe a man invested in his children bodes well for the future of the relationship, study author Dr. Susan D. Stewart of the University of Richmond in Virginia told Reuters Health. ... It shows that the men are "invested in parenting, and women like that," Stewart added.In terms of why the opposite might be true with women, Stewart said that men don't need special signals to inform them whether a single woman will be a good mother. "Men assume women will be good mothers, whether or not they have kids," she noted. In addition, when parents break up, children are much more likely to live with their mothers than their fathers, Stewart said, and live-in kids are more likely to be dependent on parents and drain them of their emotional energy. This situation may limit a mother's ability to meet new people, and render her less attractive to potential mates when she does. An absent father may also play a limited role in his children's lives, the researcher suggested, and filling the emotional gap left by an absent parent may be too daunting a task for prospective mates.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 5:33 PM |Link
THE BLACK GENDER GAP: In this week�s Newsweek, Ellis Cose, one of America�s best writers on race issues, has a cover story on the �black gender gap,� one of the most important factors behind high rates of father absence and nonmarriage among African Americans. Many people are familiar with the argument about the lack of �marriageable� black men in inner-city areas, but the gender gap goes across the socioeconomic spectrum. Black women earn twice as many college degrees as black men, twice as many master�s degrees, and 50 percent more PhDs. And this gap is growing.These trends are closely related to fatherlessness. As James Q. Wilson has written, �When there is a low sex ratio--that is, when there are many more women than men--marriages will be less common and more fragile, cohabitation will become more general, divorce will be more frequent, and children will be more likely to be raised in one-parent families.� And with more and more boys growing up fatherless, without that most important male role model, this gap can be self-perpetuating. We can�t expect an army of �father figures� or after-school programs to replace fathers. What will help is a multi-pronged effort to reduce father absence and raise the status of black men in America. What won�t help would be getting bogged down in arguments about culture vs. economics (It�s both, stupid!) or trying to avoid the marriage issue. A good starting point would be to revisit �Turning the Corner on Father Absence in Black America.� Ellis Cose also has some sage advice. P.S. For a great article on this subject, read this Atlantic piece by Katherine Boo. For another good piece, check out �What�s Love Got To Do With It?� by Georgetown professor Paul Offner in the March 2002 Washington Monthly. (Not available online, but email me if you�re interested in it.) I also wrote a little about the issue here.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 4:31 PM |Link
My friend Judith Wallerstein, the author of The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce, writes in about the Swedish study on children growing up in one-parent homes:The new Swedish study is important because it is the only study in the world of a whole population, divorced versus not divorced. At the same time, like so much quantatitve research, the researchers are left with numbers they cannot really explain, and as a result the only "causes" they can think to offer are socioeconomic. But no one ever became suicidal or a drug addict because their family did not own a house. These findings cry out for explanations that are not primarily economic, especiaily since Sweden has a much better social welfare system than we do, or almost anyone does.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 3:31 PM |Link
�TIME TO TELL IT LIKE IT IS�:Beyonce Knowles: Well, my father is a big part of my life, and that has always made me feel safe because I knew he was always there. Even now I don�t need a man because I have someone who loves me and supports me without fail.Star Jones: I grew up with my stepfather, who made a point of making me and my sister feel we belonged. My stepfather�s love and devotion and the wonderful way he treats my mother�that�s the kind of man I want. Foxy Brown: I know my dad, and I love him dearly, but he didn�t live with us. I think because of that I always hung on to guys too tight. I think it makes you lack confidence as a woman in your own skin without your father. Knowles, Jones, and Brown point to a few of the reasons why anyone who cares about creating strong, confident women should care about promoting involved fatherhood and healthy marriages. When a girl grows up with a loving father who treats her mother well, she won't tolerate trifling behavior from men. She certainly won't accept abusive behavior. She'll know she deserves better. And that is why I'm always frustrated when certain people accuse the fatherhood and marriage movements of being inimical to the well-being of women.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 2:34 PM |Link
I MUST BE OLD. I'd never heard of freak dancing.
P.S. Here's a (satiric?) freak dancing web site.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 1:00 PM |Link
"Marriage: What's government got to do with it?":The South Bend Tribune provides an in-depth look at marriage, welfare, and families:Her 1-year-old son cried when his dad put him down and left for Chicago. The tot called out for "da-da" all the time. Their oldest son said simply, "Mom ... I miss my dad.""My kids are like, 'Mom, where dad go?'" she said in her boyfriend's absence. "They're used to seeing him there every day."
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 10:16 AM |Link
ELLEN GOODMAN is against using welfare dollars to promote marriage.
posted by Tom Sylvester
at 10:09 AM |Link
Sunday, February 23, 2003
WHAT'S YOUR NAME? (Cont.)
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 3:43 PM |Link
Arranged marriages and "love marriages" among Indians living in the U.S.: "Love and marriage, in that order. The ethos so dominates mainstream Western culture, from Billboard charts to Hallmark racks, that other matrimonial approaches barely register. But in much of the Muslim world, in many Asian societies, among Hasidic Jews, and certainly in India -- which has sent roughly three-quarters of a million immigrants to the United States since 1980 -- it's still common for people to pair up the other way around: marriage first, set up by one's elders and wisers, and then, with time, love."
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 3:38 PM |Link
CHILD-FAT (CONT.): WaPo Review of Fat Land, by Greg Crister:This book originated as a magazine article, in which Critser pointed to class and poverty as "key determinants of obesity and weight-related disease" and claimed that the fast-food industry has deliberately targeted people of color. This idea may be politically appealing, but it dims under scrutiny. While some racial minorities have higher rates of obesity, particularly in childhood, obesity levels overall have increased steadily in all racial and socio-economic groups over the past decade. And while Critser's whole argument rests on obesity being a peculiarly American problem, it is in fact a global one.Thriving on progress, obesity has hit everywhere that Western-style prosperity has taken root. Half the adult populations of Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru, England, Finland and Russia are overweight, as are those of Bulgaria, Morocco, Mexico and Saudi Arabia. In India, excess weight and obesity are endemic in the middle class. And while American childhood obesity rates have doubled in a generation, the British rates have soared by 70 percent in just one decade, a trend that holds true for Russia, Australia and -- incredibly -- China. The reasons for this have very little to do with parenting practices or conspiracies, and a good deal to do with a clash between modern lifestyles and genes passed down from a very different age.
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 3:28 PM |Link
THE SEATTLE TIMES ON A NEW STUDY: "A father or stepfather's relationship with children may be influenced by whether he's married to the mother." May?
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 3:14 PM |Link
NYTs REVIEW OF Italy and Its Discontents: The Paradoxes of a Troubled Country: "Italy now has the lowest birth rate in the world and -- north of Rome -- one of the highest standards of living. What is most remarkable is its transition from a country of poor, agrarian communities to a wealthy, urban, industrial -- and now postindustrial -- society. As the subtitle indicates, Ginsborg portrays this transformation through a wide-ranging study of the institutions of family, civil society and the state, often presenting surprising conclusions."
posted by David Blankenhorn
at 3:07 PM |Link
|