Archives: February 2012

The M.Guy Tweet

02.28.2012 5:04 PM

Marriage Media
Week of February 20, 2011
Courtesy of Bill Coffin

1. Does Marriage Make Us Happy? Should It?, Psychology Today

Researchers tracked the happiness of over 10,000 individuals over the course of 5 years (from the late 1980s to the early 1990s) and found that those in the sample who were married (and especially married for the first time rather than remarried) were significantly happier than any other category (i.e., single, divorced, cohabiting, etc.).

2. Does Online Dating Make It Harder to Find ‘the One’?, TIME

Overall, the study found, Internet dating is a good thing, especially for singles who don’t otherwise have many opportunities to meet people. The industry has been successful, of course — and popular. . . Digital dating is now the second most common way that couples get together, after meeting through friends. But there are certain properties of online dating that actually work against love-seekers, the researchers found, making it no more effective than traditional dating for finding a happy relationship.

3.  Is Marriage Irrelevant?, Sliding vs. Deciding

The fact is that a child born to married parents is much more likely to be raised by his or her two parents than a child born to cohabiting parents. For example, a baby born to cohabiting parents is about five times more likely than a baby born to married parents to experience the dissolution of his or her parents relationship by age two. Data presented last year. . . suggested that, by age 12, a child born to cohabiting parents was roughly 2.5 times more likely to experience the dissolution of his or her parent’s relationship than a child born to married parents.

4. Couples Should Not Compete on Who Has Had Worse Day: Research, Telegraph

Common elements of the most supportive relationships were that each spouse was aware of the daily work demands on the other, they felt they could talk any time, did not try to distance themselves, did not bombard the family with minor work irritations and did not try to compete with who had had the worse day. Dr Hochwarter said: “Most important, though, was the ability for a spouse to offer support on days when he or she needs it just as much.

5. First Things First: ‘No Cheating, No Dying’, Times Free Press

“It was funny, because they were skeptical just like we were,” said Weil. “They also were curious about why we would do something like that if our marriage wasn’t in trouble, which gave me the opportunity to explain that marriage education is like prevention. Learning to be good at marriage is like learning anything else. You have to practice the skills. There’s no point in waiting until something goes wrong. It is much better to have tools to help you handle what life throws at you before the crises happen, so that they don’t destroy a healthy relationship.”

6. Do We No Longer Need Marriage?, CNN

For Americans with a college degree, divorce is down, marital quality is stable, and family stability is up since the divorce revolution of the 1970s and early 1980s, according to research I have conducted.

However, marriage is in trouble not only in poor communities but also increasingly in Middle America — communities where most people have a high school degree but not a four-year college degree. For Americans without a college degree, divorce remains high, marital quality is falling, and nonmarital childbearing is surging.

The problem with the growing marriage divide in America is that children — and men — often pay a big price.

7. Unwed Childbearing is the ‘New Normal’? Depends on Where You Stand, National Review Online

While marriage unravels in middle America, Murray laments that “politicians and media eminences are too frightened to say . . . [that] nonmarital births are problematic.” My colleague Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation likewise adds that “schools, the welfare system, the health care system, public authorities, and the media all remain scrupulously silent on the subject.”The “new normal” in middle America is a poor substitute for what once was. It contributes to poverty rather than to the stability upon which the American dream has been built.

As Murray asserts: “When it comes to marriage . . . the new upper class must start preaching what it practices.”

 

For more, see this site.


Medicare Does NOT Cover Custodial Care

02.28.2012 2:23 PM

A good, brief primer into the major healthcare expense that Medicare does not cover from yesterday’s LATimes.

“Medicare was designed to pay for acute illnesses and medical treatments. It won’t pay for someone to feed you or help you bathe or dress. Unless you have someone to care for you, you go into a nursing home, at about $70,000 a year, and pay for it yourself. Only when you spend all but your last few thousand do you qualify for Medicaid (known as Medi-Cal in California), which will then pay the nursing home bills.

The rules are incredibly complex; one consumer advocacy group has a 12-page flowchart for lawyers to use to help their clients qualify for help. For example, you can give away money to your spouse or children to become poor enough to go on Medicaid, but you have to get rid of it five years before you enter a nursing home.

About 1,384,000 people are living in U.S. nursing homes, down from 1,456,000 a decade ago. Old people are somewhat healthier now, and more are staying in the community. The average nursing home resident is a woman in her late 80s who needs help with four of the six basic activities of daily living: using the toilet, bathing, dressing, eating, getting in and out of bed, and moving around the house.”

An apt description of the current situation but unfortunately, no analysis or suggestions for how to move forward or improve the system are offered…


‘Do liberals disdain the disabled?’

02.28.2012 9:55 AM

A terrific opinion piece in the NYT this morning by Harold A. Pollack of the University of Chicago:

…Sixty years ago, the birth of an intellectually disabled child was viewed as a private tragedy. Families did the best they could, for as long as they could, or turned to forbidding public institutions for help. Now millions of men and women with intellectual disabilities live with greater dignity with their families or in human-scale group homes in their own communities. And every day, our family experiences countless acts of kindness and acceptance: harried business travelers patiently wait as we move ever so slowly through the airport security check; tough South Side Chicago kids wave back when Vincent waves at them; students at our daughters’ school react kindly to their classmates’ unusual-looking uncle.

Liberals and conservatives deserve credit for working together to promote genuine progress in these areas. It isn’t easy, because we have genuine differences regarding the size and role of government, abortion, separation of church and state. more


Jan Berenstain Dies

02.27.2012 11:18 PM

Hop on Pop, Berenstain Bears and Too Much TV, Bears on Wheels…

I loved the Berenstain Bear books growing up and have enjoyed sharing them with my kids.  Today’s piece in the Washington Post both celebrates the accomplishments of Jan and Stan (who died in 2005) and offers the common criticisms that were raised of their books–such as the Papa is always a bit of a bumbling fool (as most sitcom dads are), to which Jan Berenstain is said to have replied:

“Nobody likes making a mother the fall guy,” she said.


“Presence Creation” with Incarcerated Loved Ones

02.27.2012 12:57 PM

A recent interviewee in our Homeward Bound project reflected on the years that her deceased father was incarcerated.  Her memories of visits to him in jail consist of the vending machine, of getting to pick out her very own sandwich and waiting with him at the microwave as the sandwich heated up.  They would then sit and split the sandwich.  When he left for jail he gave her a matching calendar to his, and when he would call home they would mark off the days to when he would return together.  She remembers missing him like crazy, but feeling connected to him noonetheless.

As I read this recent interview with Megan Comfort, the author of Doing Time Together: Love and Family in the Shadow of Prison, I thought of her memories and realized that they were doing what Comfort calls “presence creation.”  She traces how families will synchronize watching a movie “together” or eating certain meals “together” with an incarcerated loved one: Read More


Yours, Mine, but Never Ours

02.26.2012 10:46 PM

A magistrate left to split the Australian pair’s assets said their “unusual” and “pernickety” relationship had existed only for weekly social outings and luxury holidays.

The pair, both in their 70s, married in 1991 but never moved in together – only spending weekends together at the wife’s home.

The Federal Magistrates’ Court heard they kept their finances separate and invoiced each other for amounts as trifling as 50 cents.

In college I babysat for a married couple who had a slate on their refridgerator door where they kept a running total of the small dollar amounts each “owed” the other. For reasons I could not articulate at the time, I was appalled.


What is Lasting…What is Lost…

02.26.2012 3:20 PM

“Time, like an ever rolling stream, soon bears us all away.  We fly, forgotten, as a dream dies at the opening day.  O God, our help in ages past, our hope for years to come.  Be Thou our guide while life shall last, and our eternal home.”

What is lasting…what is lost…

I just arrived home from a youth service trip to St. Louis which we were able to take since we get a week off from school for Mardi Gras in Louisiana.  On the 11-hour ride home in a 22-year-old, 15-passenger van with no A/C and no tape deck with the cigarette lighter powering a small portable fan in the third row of the van, we listened to more radio than I have listened to since I was a sophomore in high school.  Several members in the van love country music so I was introduced to today’s country hits.  Truth be told, I haven’t listened to country music much since I was in college in Oklahoma when Garth Brooks and Randy Travis still ruled the air waves, and to be honest, I was pleasantly surprised.  Compared to the vacuous and often sexually explicit lyrics of a Katy Perry or Rihanna, I felt oddly empowered and adored when listening to country. Read More


The M.Guy Tweet

02.25.2012 9:23 AM

Marriage Media
Week of February 13, 2011
Courtesy of Bill Coffin

1. Talk with Your Spouse Now about Retirement Plans, The Washington Post

From the start, Taylor and Mintzer ask couples to take a 10-question quiz to see if they are in sync. Much like a therapy session, rather than tell people what to do, the authors use exercises and other people’s post- and pre-retirement stories to get couples to think ahead and anticipate areas where they might disagree.

“The structure may help you avoid arguments and have more positive conversations,” they write. “The goal is to clarify what is important to each of you in developing a shared vision for the next part of your life together.”

2. Young Mothers Describe Marriage’s Fading Allure, New York Times

Sixty-three percent of all births to women under 30 in Lorain County occur outside marriage, according to Child Trends, a research center in Washington. That figure has risen by more than two-thirds over the past two decades, and now surpasses the national figure of 53 percent.

Young parents spoke of an economy that was fundamentally different from in their parents’ time, and that required more than a high school education for fathers to be stable breadwinners. They talked of how little they trusted each other to be reliable mates, and of how the government safety net encourages poor parents to stay single.

For more see, For Women Under 30, Most Births Occur Outside Marriage

3. Getting Married? Don’t Fall for These Money Myths, USA Today

What’s more mysterious than love? How about personal finance? In honor of Valentine’s Day, here’s a look at some common myths about marriage and money.

  • Myth 1: Marriage will increase my tax bill.
  • Myth 2: My future spouse and I can lower our tax bill by filing separate tax returns.
  • Myth 3: I don’t have to worry about being held liable for my spouse’s tax misdeeds.
  • Myth 4: Getting married could help (or hurt) my credit score.
  • Myth 5: As long as we keep our finances separate, I don’t have to worry about my spouse’s credit.

4. Why Do Happy Newlyweds Eventually Divorce?, Huffington Post

Couples who eventually divorced displayed more anger and contempt for their partners. When solving problems, they were more likely to disagree, and blame and invalidate the feelings of each other. In the laboratory, when asked to talk about an aspect of their lives that they would like to change, couples who divorced were more likely to express inappropriate pessimism, discourage the expression of feelings and insist that their partners resolve the situation on their own. Thus, it appears that the difference between these seeming satisfied young couples who divorce and those that don’t may be tied to negative communication and lack of support for each other that may eventually poison a satisfying relationship.

5. One Person Sharpens Another, The New York Times

The trend toward living alone and even living together without a marriage commitment is a drifting change, based on our desire for immediate comfort and happiness. But it ends up destroying the beauty of the human experience.

Sharing all of life with another person is difficult – but it matures us. Only the presence of another person can reveal our selfishness and prompt us toward learning the art of compromise and working together.

The alternative is to retreat into our own world, where we are so absorbed with personal comfort that we can’t be bothered to hear the concerns of another person or be inconvenienced to consider someone else’s needs. Is this what we really want?

6. Should Schools Teach Teens How To Be Good Spouses?, Huffington Post

Clearly there’s a movement to get people — with the help of teachers and counselors — to think before marrying or divorcing. It sounds like a good idea, but do marriage prep courses work? Yes and no, according to a 2010 Brigham Young University study, which examined about 50 such classes around the country. Yes, the classes significantly increased couples’ communication skills. No, the classes didn’t improve relationship quality or satisfaction.

As one researcher noted, “Engaged couples are so in love that they can’t be more satisfied. Their heads are bumping against the ceiling.” Maybe trying to talk sense into young lovers who are about to walk down the aisle is too late. Perhaps we should start talking about what makes for a healthy marriage in high school; at least that’s what the majority of responders in an informal survey Susan Pease Gadoua and I offered as part of our research for our book, “The New I Do,” indicated.

For a high school curriculum in the OJJDP Model Programs Guide, see here.

7. Shame & Empathy by Dr. Brené Brown, Youtube

Connection is our ability to forge meaningful, authentic relationships with other people. I believe connection is the essence of the human experience. It is what breathes life and gives meaning to our lives. If you think about connection on a continuum, anchoring us on this end is empathy. It is what moves to us deep, meaningful relationships. On the other side of the continuum connection is shame. It absolutely unravels our connection and relationships with other people. . . When we are in our best vulnerability, that moves us toward empathy.

For more, see this site.


‘Downside of rising single motherhood’

02.24.2012 12:39 PM

Cathy Young of Reason writes:

…married fathers, especially in households where both parents work, have become involved in hands-on child-rearing to an extent that would have seemed unthinkable 50 years ago. It is no longer unusual to see fathers changing diapers, bottle-feeding infants, or shopping with toddlers. Stay-at-home dads are a small but growing population.

Yet the trend toward more engaged fatherhood is being canceled out by the growing number of children with no father in the home. This redefinition of families as women and their children is a modern-day version of the old-fashioned, very non-feminist notion of family and child-rearing as a female domain in which men are only visitors. Sending men the signal that they are disposable is hardly a way to encourage them to be better fathers.

Concerns about the drop in two-parent families are often couched in sexist nostalgia for the days when men were the breadwinners and women stayed home. The 1950s-style family is certainly not the only environment in which children can thrive. But glorifying single motherhood is no better and, in the end, no less sexist.


One woman trying to find a way out of the new normal

02.23.2012 12:51 PM

From the UK:

Sabine, a model, knew instantly her years of dating toyboys had been a mistake. What she needed was a divorcee, like Steve, who had lived, loved, lost — and learnt some important lessons about how to treat a woman.

Even when Sabine, 36, discovered Steve, 41, had been divorced not once but three times, and had two children, she wasn’t deterred.

‘I didn’t consider these ex-wives and children as baggage but part of Steve’s history, one that he had gained lots of experience from, which has gone towards making him the loving, caring man he is today,’ says Sabine who, a year after that first meeting, now shares a home with Steve in South London.

‘I’d always been attracted to men younger than me — I was engaged to a man seven years my junior — but they weren’t man enough to support me through difficult times.

My parents separated when I was a baby and I never knew my father growing up. Then I lost my mum seven years ago to cancer. A couple of years later, my aunt committed suicide.

‘The young men I dated back then didn’t know how to support me through all this and I broke off my engagement after Mum died, frightened by thoughts of how my fiance would cope if I ever became ill.

‘I realise now someone like Steve who has suffered his fair share of heartache, going through divorces and not seeing as much of his children as he would like, is what I really need.’


From Australia

02.23.2012 12:37 PM

A new report on forced relinquishment:

It’s now a cornerstone of social welfare policy that children should, if at all possible, stay with their birth parents, in particular their mother. Not so in years gone by. Right up to the 1970s, having a child out of wedlock was frowned upon and young women who fell pregnant were actively encouraged to give up their babies for adoption. Authorities argued this was done with good intentions, but now a powerful Senate Committee has heard evidence that tells a very different story.

It now seems many young, single mothers were never given the option of keeping their child. Unmarried mothers automatically had their hospital records marked ready for adoption – even before giving birth. There is evidence that some were sedated. Others were denied access to their babies as they were making crucial decisions about their future. As a result, these women have suffered terrible emotional distress throughout their lives…


From Israel

02.23.2012 12:34 PM

Maybe the new normal is a global discussion:

The number of single Jewish women opting to become mothers has increased  dramatically over the past decade, according to statistics released on Tuesday  by the Central Bureau of Statistics. The data, which were published to  coincide with Family Day celebrated nationwide on Thursday, shows that some  4,900 single Jewish women in Israel gave birth in 2010, nearly double the 2,600  single women who gave birth in 2000. The increase can be linked to advances in  medical technology and the country’s policy of making fertility treatment widely  available and free.


‘A Separation’

02.22.2012 10:39 AM

I’m looking forward to seeing this Oscar nominated film:

Set in contemporary Iran, A Separation is a compelling drama about the dissolution of a marriage. Simin wants to leave Iran with her husband Nader and daughter Termeh. Simin sues for divorce when Nader refuses to leave behind his Alzheimer-suffering father. Her request having failed, Simin returns to her parents’ home, but Termeh decides to stay with Nader.

When Nader hires a young woman to assist with his father in his wife’s absence, he hopes that his life will return to a normal state. However, when he discovers that the new maid has been lying to him, he realizes that there is more on the line than just his marriage.

Director Asghar Farhadi’s Separation stars Leila Hatami, Peyman Moaadi, Shahab Hosseini, Sareh Bayat, Sarina Farhadi.


‘Family Ties, Without Tying the Knot’

02.22.2012 10:30 AM

I’m a bit late putting this up (it ran Feb 13) but the NYT Room for Debate ran several pieces in response to this question, below, including by FamilyScholars blogger and retired Georgia Supreme Court chief justice Leah Ward Sears and by legal scholar Robin Fretwell Wilson, editor of an important book, Reconceiving the Family, that arose out of a project here at the Institute:

This week, New Jersey becomes the latest state to take up a same-sex marriage bill. But the Pew Research Center tells us that fewer Americans are marrying, suggesting that younger people are looking for other ways to define “family.”

Why are lawmakers so hung up on marriage? If fewer Americans are choosing to marry, what are the legal implications for relationships that are based on something other than marriage or parenting?


‘Do we no longer need marriage?’

02.22.2012 10:23 AM

Asks Brad Wilcox at CNN:

…the problem with the retreat from marriage in poor and working-class communities is that fewer children, not to mention adults (especially men), benefit from the meaning, direction and stability afforded by an intact, family life. Conversely, American adults and children hailing from more educated communities and affluence are more likely to be doubly blessed with high levels of income and education as well as strong and stable families.

There are at least two ways to bridge the growing marriage divide. First, liberals correctly note that one reason marriage is disappearing is that men in poor and working-class communities are having greater difficulty finding stable, decent-paying jobs — particularly as manufacturing jobs head overseas. Our government should aim to strengthen vocational education and job programs in these communities.

Conservatives are also correct to point out that the cultural foundations of marriage have weakened in poor and working-class communities. For instance, since the 1970s, less-educated Americans have become more accommodating of divorce, whereas college-educated Americans have become more intolerant of divorce and are in fact, more likely to embrace what I call a marriage mind-set. more


Should the new norm concern us?

02.20.2012 1:05 PM

At the New York Times “Motherlode” blog, KJ Dell’Antonia is thinking out loud about that big headline:

Unmarried mothers, in some areas, have become the norm, no longer stigmatized by society. Regular readers of this blog will know that while births among teenagers are down in recent years, the majority of commenters here, at least, would support, not shun, a teenager of their acquaintance with a baby. That tolerance clearly extends to all unmarried mothers. Many of us pride ourselves on the modernity of this relatively new way of thinking — who would insist that only a family mirroring some 50’s-sitcom image of “nuclear” can raise a happy, healthy child?

But is our pride misplaced? Fifty-three percent of all children born to women under 30 is an awful lot of children born outside of what’s been considered, for more than a handful of years, the most stable family structure…

Can we find a way to support marriage at all levels of society without recreating the stigma for unmarried mothers and their children, and should we?


Middle Class Marriage

02.19.2012 11:37 PM

The drudgery, the beauty:

She and Jeffrey had fallen into silence, the long flight from California behind them, in which they had already conducted the conversation of a busy couple in forced companionship, reviewing the household matters they had had no time for, and managing, in the interest of the long journey still ahead of them, to avoid recriminations and criticism on a variety of touchy subjects—things undone, details of child rearing, delayed decisions about the plumbing. Chloe did not say, though she had often thought, that if only Jeffrey would take the children out on some sort of expedition on Saturday afternoons, she could use the time to do some of the things that needed doing around the house. Jeffrey did not say, as he so often did, that if she were more punctilious about certain housekeeping things then the atmosphere would be generally more harmonious and he’d feel like doing more around the house. Maybe they should go ahead with a new sprinkler system, though in principle Chloe, home in the mornings, could take care of the sprinkling. Sara would finish the school year at her present, even though not wonderful, school. A few other things settled, a few deferred again. Second thoughts—maybe instead of the sprinkler system, the priority thing was the roof.

–Diane Johnson, Persian Nights, pp. 11-12


Aging Well

02.19.2012 11:04 AM

Just finished Aging Well a fascinating book authored by Dr. George Vaillet who reflects on the findings of three groundbreaking prospective studies that assessed and interviewed individuals for 6-8 decades: 268 socially advantaged Harvard graduates born around 1920, 456 socially disadvantaged Inner City men born around 1930, and 90 middle class, intellectually gifted women born around 1910.  Every five years the individuals were interviewed at length in person, and every two years the individuals filled out comprehensive quantitative surveys and completed a physical exam.  Members of their family, such as spouses, parents, and children, were interviewed every five years as well.

The book is fascinating as a whole but their findings concerning what predicts successful aging that leads to feeling “happy/well” at 80 versus “sad/sick” at 80 really make you think:

For example, from page 13:

1)      It’s not the bad things that happen to you that doom you; it’s the good people who happen to us at any age that facilitate enjoyable old age.

2)      Healthy relationships are facilitated by a capacity for gratitude, for forgiveness, and for taking people inside.

3)      A good marriage at age 50 predicted positive aging at 80.  But surprisingly, low cholesterol levels at age 50 did not.

4)      Alcohol abuse consistently predicted unsuccessful aging, in part because alcoholism damaged future social supports.

5)      Learning to play and create after retirement and learning to gain younger friends as we lose older ones add more to life’s enjoyment than retirement income.

6)      Objective good physical health was less important to successful aging than subjective good health…It is all right to be ill as long as you do not feel sick.

Overall, people who don’t abuse alcohol and/or cigarettes, are good at reframing negative experiences, are in a stable love relationship, never stop learning whether that education be from school, books, new experiences, or their children, and can forgive, live not only longer, but better.


Grief is Terrible, but Normal

02.19.2012 10:40 AM

Of late, I have been interviewing adults who experienced the death of their mom or dad, stepmom or stepdad, about a year ago.  Interviews last about two hours, and I am amazed by how little I say.  The people who choose to be interviewed talk and I listen.  I am often surprised to learn that I am the first person they have talked to at length about the death of their parents or about how they are learning to live with the loss.  Every story of loss is painful to varying degrees but also quite normal.

This past week the editorial staff of The Lancet weighed in on the debate concerning eliminating the waiting period for diagnosing someone with depression after a death.  The DSM-5 will be released in 2013 and much discussion has occurred concerning making this change.  The Lancet believes we should not “medicalize” grief:

“Routinely legitimizing the treatment of grief with antidepressants “is not only dangerously simplistic, but also flawed,” says the unsigned lead editorial appearing in Friday’s edition of the influential international medical journal. “  Grief is not an illness; it is more usefully thought of as part of being human and a normal response to the death of a loved one.”

Grief and dealing with life-altering change, and struggling with that task, is normal.  Dr. Arthur Klienman goes on to say:

“The central problem is the lack of “conclusive scientific evidence to show what a normal length of bereavement is.” Drawing from his anthropological studies, he said that “across the world, societies differ greatly in what they regard as normal grief: some do regard a year as a marker, and yet others sanction longer periods – even a lifetime.”

Kleinman recounted his own experience of losing his wife of 46 years to Alzheimer’s disease in March 2011, describing the agitation, fatigue, weight loss and other symptoms that set in. It took 6 months before his grief lessened. Nearly a year since he became a widower, he continues to experience “sadness at times and harbor the sense that part of me is gone forever.”

“My grief, like that of millions of others, signaled the loss of something truly vital in my life,” Kleinman wrote. “The pain was part of the remembering and maybe also the remaking. It punctuated the end of a time and a form of living, and marked the transition to a new time and a different way of living.”

Although I genuinely wish there were a fix to grief, I agree that making grief an illness may take away a part of what makes us genuinely human.  When I read the opinions of The Lancet staff I am reminded that grief is not a source issue to be treated, grief is a symptom.  The source issue is that someone you love has died, and that source issue is terminal and sadly cannot be reversed.  The symptoms of that source will be great, but are not a sign of disease, they are a sign of your humanity.


“Surrogacy Is Reproductive Prostitution”

02.18.2012 12:14 PM

My Father's Daughter

“Commercial surrogacy amounts to reproductive prostitution. You make use of the bodily functions of another person to fulfil your own needs. That’s what happens in prostitution. It has nothing to do with the interests of the child.” 

Strong words.